Loading the public record
Loading the public record
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
All recent votes119th CongressHouse
This bill modifies standards under the Clean Air Act to exempt states from penalties for emissions outside of the state’s control.
The bill provides that certain nonattainment areas (i.e., those classified as severe or extreme for ozone or as serious for particulate matter) are not subject to sanctions for implementation plan deficiencies or for fees for failing to attain national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) if the state demonstrates it would have avoided deficiencies or attained its standards but for emissions outside of its control (e.g., emissions from an exceptional event like a wildfire). A state must renew its demonstration at least once every five years for exemption from the sanctions or fees to continue to apply.
The bill specifies that an area within a state may not be designated as a nonattainment area regarding any new or revised NAAQS for a pollutant if the state demonstrates it would be in attainment but for emissions emanating from outside of the country, regardless of whether the emissions resulted from human activity.
For purposes of approving a state implementation plan or meeting certain NAAQS, current law provides that a state may demonstrate to the Environmental Protection Agency that but for emissions emanating from outside of the country, it would have attained applicable NAAQS by the attainment date for certain pollutants. The bill specifies that such emissions emanating from outside the country may include emissions that result from human activity.
Written by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service, describing H.R. 6409 as reported to House on Apr 9, 2026. It is not the text of the measure; a later amendment may have changed what it does.
Apr 16, 2026Each bar: ✓ Yea from the bottom, ✕ Nay aboveApr 16, 2026
House Apr 16, 2026 · the primary vote
FENCES Act
Passed
220 Yea 208 Nay 3 not voting
Party-line vote 7 of 428 voting members broke with their own party: 6 Democrats, 1 Republican.
DemocratsIndependentsRepublicansFilled: YeaRing: NayGrey: not voting or present
431 members on this roll call, from the official House record. Party majorities need at least five voting members, so an independent never counts as breaking with a party.
Signing on is not a vote: a member can cosponsor H.R. 6409 and vote against it. 0 signed when it was filed.
Organizations that named H.R. 6409 in a lobbying disclosure. Only those that cited the bill by number appear, so this is a floor, not a full list.
56 disclosures name this measure. Retrieved from LDA.gov on 2026-10-25. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.