Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › WA-10 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, WA-10
Representative since 2021
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
4 priorities from stricklandforwashington.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Working people and small businesses are struggling with rising costs. That’s why I’ve spent my time in Congress focused on lowering costs, creating jobs, and getting our economy back on track. I’ve fought to build more housing, fix our roads and bridges, and train students for careers in nursing, health care, teaching, and the building trades.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · stricklandforwashington.com/priorities
Too few Americans have access to health care that is actually affordable. Nobody should die or face bankruptcy because they can’t afford to visit their doctor. I will continue to stand up to extreme attempts to take away health care from Americans, protect Medicare, and make health care more affordable.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · stricklandforwashington.com/priorities
We need to do more to protect our planet for our kids and future generations. In Congress, I’m working to boost renewable energy.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · stricklandforwashington.com/priorities
I’m a proud Army brat and represent tens of thousands of servicemembers, veterans, and military families who call our region home. I’ve led bipartisan legislation to help military families facing food insecurity and to make sure military families have access to affordable housing.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · stricklandforwashington.com/priorities
98% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 14 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Armed Services
House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Strickland’s 58 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00732826
99¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($1.9M of $1.9M). Cash on hand went from $586.4K on Mar 31, 2025 to $608.8K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $175,219 | $169,363 | $586,444 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $295,054 | $197,070 | $684,428 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $220,871 | $227,986 | $677,312 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $181,602 | $249,024 | $609,890 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $288,532 | $95,993 | $802,429 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $318,250 | $429,431 | $691,248 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 15, 2026 | $31,776 | $45,527 | $677,498 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $331,410 | $304,630 | $704,278 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $49,862 | $145,377 | $608,762 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
33 endorsers listed on Marilyn Strickland’s own campaign site: 3 parties, 18 unions, 10 organizations, 2 newspapers.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Advanced · 73,689 votes (47%) · 1 of 6 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,808 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $876.7K.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 412 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $849.4K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $1,892,576
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
68% of the money placed by state came from inside Washington: $592.3K of $876.7K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,565 contributions · 68% | $592,305 |
| 62 contributions · 9.3% | $81,665 |
| 36 contributions · 6.4% | $55,750 |
| 43 contributions · 4.8% | $42,500 |
| 13 contributions · 2.6% | $22,376 |
| 14 contributions · 1.6% | $13,766 |
| 13 contributions · 1.2% | $10,250 |
| 4 contributions · 1% | $9,000 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 27 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 998 contributions · 41% of ranked | $335,685 |
| Written instead of an employer · 112 contributions · 6.5% of ranked | $53,273 |
| 4 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 4 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 21 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $11,167 |
| 3 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 6 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $9,632 |
| 6 contributions · 1% of ranked | $8,282 |
A further $3,276 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($77,889) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $6,249 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $1,837,701
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,171 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
65 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $208,399 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 7 payments · 21% of all spending | $390,000 |
| 78 payments · 17% of all spending | $311,167 |
| 34 payments · 14% of all spending | $251,827 |
| 111 payments · 7.7% of all spending | $143,651 |
| 20 payments · 6.4% of all spending | $119,286 |
| 13 payments · 4.7% of all spending | $87,712 |
| 6 payments · 3.5% of all spending | $66,176 |
| 2 payments · 3.3% of all spending | $61,600 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 936 contributions · 33% of ranked | $290,990 |
| 79 contributions · 10% of ranked | $90,558 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 62 contributions · 5.1% of ranked | $44,695 |
| 46 contributions · 4.1% of ranked | $35,595 |
| 56 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $30,104 |
| 42 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $25,436 |
| 8 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 13 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $18,266 |
A further $3,276 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($77,889) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.