Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (qualified)Lobbyist/registrant PACCorporationWashington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: The Cigna Group
Political fund of The Cigna Group
The Cigna Group is an American multinational for-profit managed healthcare and insurance company based in Bloomfield, Connecticut. Cigna's insurance subsidiaries are major providers of medical, dental, disability, life and accident insurance and related products and services, the majority of which are offered through employers and other groups (e.g., governmental and non-governmental organizations, unions and associations). Cigna is incorporated in Delaware. The company ranked No. 15 in the 2023 Fortune 500 list of the largest U.S. corporations by total revenue, and the company took 68th place in the 2023 Forbes Global 2000 ranking. It has been embroiled in controversies, including engaging in automatic denials of insurance claims without reviewing them. (Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00085316 · files monthly
“To improve the health and vitality of those we serve.”
The Cigna Group, the organization this committee is the political fund of, thecignagroup.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
1 priority from the site of The Cigna Group, the organization this committee is the political fund of, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
As a company whose mission is to improve the health and vitality of those we serve, we adopt a precautionary approach to environmental sustainability efforts.
Meaning, preventive action—versus remediation—should be taken in the face of potential, serious, or irreversible harm to the environment or human health.
We aim to serve as a connector and catalyst for change to protect global access to healthy air, water, soil, and food.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · thecignagroup.com/our-impact/esg/healthy-environment/environmental-policy-statement
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 64 | $331,500 | $0 | $331,500 | 46% |
| Democratic | 89 | $307,000 | $0 | $307,000 | 43% |
| Other or unresolved | 27 | $75,000 | $0 | $75,000 | 11% |
| Shown support | 180 | $713,500 | $0 | $713,500 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 89 | $305.5K · 23% |
| Republican candidates | 63 | $321.5K · 24% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 29 | $87.5K · 6.6% |
| Democratic party committees | 4 | $25.5K · 1.9% |
| Republican party committees | 2 | $16K · 1.2% |
| Other party committees | 7 | $150K · 11% |
| Other PACs and committees | 68 | $417K · 32% |
| All recipients | 262 | $1.3M |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 17 | $57K |
| Missouri | 10 | $54.5K |
| Ohio | 11 | $48K |
| Louisiana | 5 | $40K |
| Florida | 7 | $38K |
| Pennsylvania | 8 | $30.5K |
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 20,254 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.6M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $2,218,565
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 16,982 contributions · 80% | $1,272,230 |
| 738 contributions · 5.2% | $82,346 |
| 277 contributions · 1.7% | $27,426 |
| 298 contributions · 1.7% |
Total reported disbursements $2,482,089
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Total itemized disbursements $1,323,000
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 490 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 4 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $30,000 |
$2.5M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $762.9K, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Besides giving through its PAC, The Cigna Group and Subsidiaries pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
The organization’s own reports give its total lobbying costs, including any firms it hired; each firm reports what this client paid it.
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $402.8K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “THE CIGNA GROUP AND SUBSIDIARIES (FORMERLY CIGNA CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES)”, found by searching “CIGNA”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Oct 26, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
The Cigna Group is an American multinational for-profit managed healthcare and insurance company based in Bloomfield, Connecticut. Cigna's insurance subsidiaries are major providers of medical, dental, disability, life and accident insurance and related products and services, the majority of which are offered through employers and other groups (e.g., governmental and non-governmental organizations, unions and associations). Cigna is incorporated in Delaware. The company ranked No. 15 in the 2023 Fortune 500 list of the largest U.S. corporations by total revenue, and the company took 68th place in the 2023 Forbes Global 2000 ranking. It has been embroiled in controversies, including engaging in automatic denials of insurance claims without reviewing them. Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
The Cigna Group Employee PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| Texas | 8 | $29.5K |
|---|
| New York | 8 | $27.5K |
|---|
The largest 8 of 43 states.
Bars drawn to $30K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to COLE COMBINED COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 4 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $30K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to 2025 SENATORS CLASSIC COMMITTEE · 4 payments | $11.5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION · 4 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICA'S HEALTH INSURANCE PLANS, INC. · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to BRITT · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 3 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
$1.3M across 261 recipient committees, or 53% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown. A further $10K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $26,810 |
| 192 contributions · 1.2% | $19,781 |
| 194 contributions · 1.1% | $17,083 |
| 115 contributions · 0.8% | $12,956 |
| 158 contributions · 0.8% | $12,873 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 16,263 contributions · 73% of ranked | $1,156,065 |
| 1,551 contributions · 12% of ranked | $189,929 |
| 590 contributions · 3.9% of ranked | $62,257 |
| 473 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $48,719 |
| 502 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $44,818 |
| 332 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $29,162 |
| 127 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $13,010 |
| 54 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $9,018 |
A further $944 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($492,168) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 308 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $45,165 |
| 310 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $41,429 |
| 8 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $40,000 |
| 571 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $32,534 |
| 379 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $31,510 |
| 251 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $31,394 |
| 201 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $30,352 |
| 146 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $27,161 |
Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($492,168) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| $30,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 4 payments · 0.5% of all spending | $11,500 |
| 4 payments · 0.4% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.4% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.4% of all spending | $10,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.