Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › MO-08 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, MO-08
Representative since 2013
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
10 priorities from jasonsmith.house.gov, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
The army of Washington regulators who have never stepped foot in Missouri should not have the power to tell you what you can and cannot do. In Congress, I am constantly working to roll back regulations and keep Washington off your back.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jasonsmith.house.gov/issues/keeping-washington-out-of-missouri
Healthcare is personal. I believe you should have healthcare freedom and plenty of choices when making these very personal decisions for you and your family. Bottom line – the government should not be sitting in the exam room with you and your doctor.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jasonsmith.house.gov/issues/care-for-missourians
The number one role of the US Government is to keep you and your family safe. As your voice in Congress, I am supporting policies that make America safe and strong both at home and abroad.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jasonsmith.house.gov/issues/protecting-the-homeland
You earned your paycheck, and you should be able to keep it because you know how to spend your money way better than some bureaucrat in Washington.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jasonsmith.house.gov/issues/your-money-belongs-in-your-pocket
Our Founding Fathers defined “inalienable rights” that all Americans are born with. No matter how much the world has changed since these rights were written, we must make sure that they’re not stripped away by a Washington lobbyist only concerned with representing liberal interests.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jasonsmith.house.gov/issues/defending-your-rights
Missourians know how to take care of what’s in their backyard. In Congress, I’m fighting to make sure Washington bureaucrats don’t restrict our natural resources.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jasonsmith.house.gov/issues/mark-twain-national-forest
The economic might of the Mississippi is powerful, but so are her currents. I support policies to ensure the Mississippi River floods our local economies with jobs, and barring an act of God, does not flood the streets and towns that line the Mighty Mississippi.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jasonsmith.house.gov/issues/the-mighty-mississippi
Agriculture is the number one economic driver in our Congressional District. As your Representative in Congress, I am focused on farms and fighting for the families who run them.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jasonsmith.house.gov/issues/focused-on-farms
Families are the foundation of our country. As the son of a pastor, I well-know the values that you’re raising your family with, and as your Congressman, I am here to make sure the government respects and does not interfere with those values.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jasonsmith.house.gov/issues/family-values
The men and women who put on a uniform to defend our nation deserve the absolute best. Whether it’s fully funding the equipment they need to do their jobs or ensuring they have great healthcare when they get home from a tour of duty, I am honored to vote in favor of policies that support our Veterans.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · jasonsmith.house.gov/issues/american-heroes
98% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 15 times in the 119th Congress.
Joint Committee on Taxation Vice Chairman
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Smith’s 45 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00541862
62¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($3.9M of $6.3M). Cash on hand went from $3.7M on Mar 31, 2025 to $5.4M on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $1,355,375 | $705,135 | $3,667,383 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $1,120,760 | $496,872 | $4,291,272 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $692,737 | $493,002 | $4,491,007 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $619,289 | $412,654 | $4,697,642 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $672,390 | $485,880 | $4,884,151 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $751,076 | $479,517 | $5,155,711 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 15, 2026 | $52,556 | $196,165 | $5,012,103 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $968,123 | $517,446 | $5,462,779 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $66,865 | $114,567 | $5,415,077 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
No endorsements page
Advanced · 94,468 votes (86%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 1,131 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $3.2M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 5,224 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.3M.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The largest of the sources is listed. In all, 15 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $937.9K.
Total reported receipts $6,299,171
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
28% of the money placed by state came from inside Missouri: $355.8K of $1.3M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 415 contributions · 28% | $355,819 |
| 463 contributions · 10% | $129,262 |
| 594 contributions · 10% | $129,010 |
| 136 contributions · 8.5% | $108,667 |
| 182 contributions · 5.7% | $72,725 |
| 564 contributions · 5.3% | $67,698 |
| 139 contributions · 3.2% | $40,495 |
| 256 contributions · 2.7% | $34,446 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 50 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 3,842 contributions · 16% of ranked | $167,217 |
| Written instead of an employer · 140 contributions · 6.7% of ranked | $71,764 |
| 11 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $38,500 |
| 9 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $33,250 |
| 26 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $29,541 |
| 8 contributions · 2% of ranked | $21,800 |
| 3 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $16,500 |
| 6 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $15,000 |
A further $24,145 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($292,920) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $24,787 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $3,358,017
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,734 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
65 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $668,701 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 21 payments · 43% of all spending | $1,683,018 |
| 44 payments · 9.5% of all spending | $372,567 |
| 18 payments · 7.8% of all spending | $305,200 |
| 18 payments · 3.6% of all spending | $140,634 |
| 31 payments · 3% of all spending | $118,809 |
| 77 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $109,093 |
| 7 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $61,423 |
| 19 payments · 1.5% of all spending | $58,507 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 3,853 contributions · 13% of ranked | $168,143 |
| 86 contributions · 10% of ranked | $131,493 |
| 41 contributions · 4% of ranked | $50,100 |
| 71 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $43,376 |
| 61 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $39,360 |
| 13 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $31,550 |
| 23 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $28,950 |
| 23 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $27,375 |
A further $12,500 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($292,920) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.