Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › PA-06 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, PA-06
Representative since 2019
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
16 priorities from chrissyhoulahanforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
My experiences as a veteran, an educator, an entrepreneur, and an engineer give me a unique background to continue to meet the moment in our country’s history and prepare for a better tomorrow.
- I believe in the inherent value of all people and that each of us has something to contribute.
- I believe in the Department of Defense and that diplomacy and our allies are integral to our national security.
- I believe that healthcare is a right, a living wage is necessary, climate change is urgent, and quality education enables people to live better lives.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · chrissyhoulahanforcongress.com
95% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 30 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Armed Services
House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Houlahan’s 82 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00637371
64¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($1.3M of $2.1M). Cash on hand went from $3.5M on Mar 31, 2025 to $4.1M on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $237,366 | $143,182 | $3,499,797 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $277,328 | $167,073 | $3,610,052 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $214,972 | $114,039 | $3,710,985 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $365,734 | $224,350 | $3,852,368 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $224,390 | $172,697 | $3,904,061 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Apr 29, 2026 | $162,857 | $77,850 | $3,989,068 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $280,769 | $232,077 | $4,037,759 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $282,779 | $206,240 | $4,114,299 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $40,697 | $7,268 | $4,147,728 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
24 endorsers listed on Chrissy Houlahan’s own campaign site: 8 unions, 16 organizations.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Advanced · 59,478 votes (100%) · 1 of 1 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 2,704 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $960.3K.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 414 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $668.2K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The largest of the sources is listed. In all, 1 transfer was filed this cycle, totaling $911.
Total reported receipts $2,086,891
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
51% of the money placed by state came from inside Pennsylvania: $487.6K of $960.3K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2,282 contributions · 51% | $487,613 |
| 65 contributions · 13% | $121,600 |
| 129 contributions · 10% | $98,347 |
| 35 contributions · 7.3% | $69,760 |
| 36 contributions · 4.1% | $39,250 |
| 21 contributions · 2.3% | $22,350 |
| 19 contributions · 2.2% | $20,885 |
| 9 contributions · 2.1% | $20,550 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 32 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1,792 contributions · 45% of ranked | $419,175 |
| Written instead of an employer · 150 contributions · 6.9% of ranked | $64,929 |
| 3 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 4 contributions · 1% of ranked | $9,000 |
| 4 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $8,750 |
| 3 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $8,500 |
| 4 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $8,500 |
A further $15,000 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($158,249) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $10,335 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $957,569
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 478 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
4 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $2,216 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 16 payments · 17% of all spending | $226,078 |
| 4 payments · 10% of all spending | $140,000 |
| 18 payments · 8.8% of all spending | $118,000 |
| 19 payments · 5.3% of all spending | $71,106 |
| 19 payments · 4.8% of all spending | $64,550 |
| 21 payments · 3% of all spending | $40,000 |
| 88 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $33,032 |
| 6 payments · 1.9% of all spending | $25,495 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,618 contributions · 38% of ranked | $355,698 |
| 63 contributions · 9.7% of ranked | $91,599 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 162 contributions · 5.7% of ranked | $53,742 |
| 32 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $26,650 |
| 56 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $25,420 |
| 51 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $24,175 |
| 13 contributions · 2% of ranked | $19,250 |
| 8 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $17,250 |
A further $15,000 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($158,249) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.