Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (qualified)Lobbyist/registrant PACLabor organizationUpper Marlboro, MarylandActive
Connected organization: International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers
Political fund of International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00002469 · files monthly
“We believe it is a natural right of working people to enjoy to the full extent the wealth created by their labor.
We believe that given the state of work in our current world, people must unite to obtain the full reward of their labor.”
International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, the organization this committee is the political fund of, goiam.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
6 priorities from the site of International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, the organization this committee is the political fund of, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Representatives and members from NFFE-IAM were in Washington, D.C. to urge lawmakers to pass H.R.3300, also known as the Forest Protection and Wildland Firefighter Safety Act.
If signed into law, the bill strengthens healthcare and safety of firefighters who risk their lives battling blazes.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · goiam.org
Heading as listed on goiam.org ↗ (opens goiam.org at this heading) · “MOST RECENT NEWS” on goiam.org ↗ (opens goiam.org at this heading)
Right now, disabled veterans are not receiving the full retirement compensation that they deserve for their service and sacrifice.
The Major Richard Star Act would change that.
Send a letter to your members of Congress urging them to pass the Major Richard Star Act!
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · goiam.org
Heading as listed on goiam.org ↗ (opens goiam.org at this heading)
The IAM Union is calling on all members, allies, and community supporters to mobilize now and push back against renewed efforts to privatize the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)—a public institution that for more than a century has provided reliable, affordable energy to millions and supported thousands of good union...
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · goiam.org
Heading as listed on goiam.org ↗ (opens goiam.org at this heading)
Heading as listed on goiam.org ↗ (opens goiam.org at this heading)
The Machinists Non-Partisan Political League is the political arm of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers.
It was created in 1947 to allow IAM members to gather individual contributions, coordinate political activity, and elect candidates who support IAM members and their families.
Candidates we support know that the MNPL stands for economic justice, security in the workplace and equality for every member.
They do not take us for granted.
The MNPL scrutinizes each candidate thoroughly.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · goiam.org/mnpl
The Legislative department of the IAM ensures that the members of the IAM are represented in Washington.
From legislation that destroys vital laws that protect working men and women, to ensuring that the members issues are heard – the legislative department spends countless hours speaking with congressional leaders on behalf of IAM members.
As with MNPL, the legislative department works to secure economic justice and security in the workplace.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · goiam.org/mnpl
Heading as listed on goiam.org/mnpl ↗ (opens goiam.org/mnpl at this heading)
Heading as listed on goiam.org/mnpl ↗ (opens goiam.org/mnpl at this heading)
The IAM works hard to advance the interests of working families, promote the cause of our members and defend our members’ rights.
Just as IAM solidarity at the bargaining tables helps to improve our jobs, we as the labor force need to stand united and work together to stop the continued assault on working families through legislative action.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · goiam.org/departments/headquarters/politics-and-legislation
We believe it is a natural right of working people to enjoy to the full extent the wealth created by their labor.
We believe that given the state of work in our current world, people must unite to obtain the full reward of their labor.
We believe that working people should exercise their rights cooperatively and economically for the benefit of all people.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · goiam.org/about
Heading as listed on goiam.org/about ↗ (opens goiam.org/about at this heading) · “About” on goiam.org/about ↗ (opens goiam.org/about at this heading)
Organizing Service Contract Act (SCA) workers is a priority for the IAM.
SCA is a growing segment of the private workforce with hundreds of thousands of employees who deserve improved pay, benefits, job security and respect.
And, the IAM can deliver.
Service contracts employ a wide range of professions and skill sets.
So, what’s the secret to our success?
This means that union-bargained wages and benefits replace the AWD.
So, make the smart choice!
Form a Union Where You Work.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · goiam.org/about/service-contract-workers-go-iam
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 292 | $2.4M · 77% |
| Republican candidates | 10 | $68.5K · 2.2% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 21 | $110K · 3.6% |
| Democratic party committees | 4 | $90K · 2.9% |
| Other PACs and committees | 63 | $430K · 14% |
| All recipients | 390 | $3.1M |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 53 | $475K |
| New York | 23 | $197.5K |
| Illinois | 22 | $152.5K |
| Pennsylvania | 18 | $145K |
| Florida | 18 | $112K |
| New Jersey | 11 | $95K |
| Massachusetts | 9 | $90K |
| Texas | 16 | $89.5K |
The largest 8 of 44 states.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 14,637 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.8M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $4,498,926
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2,313 contributions · 15% | $257,422 |
| 1,233 contributions · 10% | $185,130 |
| 1,630 contributions · 9.7% |
Total reported disbursements $4,565,531
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$4.6M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $597K, July 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
1978 cycleReport released Jun 2, 1981
Late M11 report, 2005$3.6K assessed
Case 1434 at the FEC ↗Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Machinists NON Partisan Political League of the International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Its FEC record names International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Machinists NON Partisan Political League of the International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
Bars drawn to $45K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| House campaign committee · Connected to JOSH RILEY VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $500 |
$500 from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $45K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $30K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · Connected to MINNESOTA SECOND DISTRICT VICTORY COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $20K |
| House campaign committee · 4 payments | $20K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to WALKINSHAW VICTORY FUND · 4 payments | $20K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to TORRES VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to TAMMY BALDWIN VICTORY COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $10K |
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to BATTLEGROUND BLUE PAC · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
$3M across 392 recipient committees, or 66% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $170,785 |
| 768 contributions · 7.6% | $134,226 |
| 839 contributions · 5.6% | $99,153 |
| 330 contributions · 4.5% | $80,163 |
| 586 contributions · 3.8% | $67,836 |
| 475 contributions · 3.1% | $55,504 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 5,372 contributions · 40% of ranked | $702,246 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1,621 contributions · 8.1% of ranked | $142,341 |
| 1,377 contributions · 7.1% of ranked | $125,546 |
| 355 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $78,931 |
| 534 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $63,856 |
| 455 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $54,945 |
| 432 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $48,627 |
| 223 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $28,838 |
A further $2,233 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,672,057) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 661 contributions · 8.1% of ranked | $141,168 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,585 contributions · 7.4% of ranked | $129,549 |
| 919 contributions · 6.8% of ranked | $119,691 |
| 1,728 contributions · 5.7% of ranked | $99,024 |
| 519 contributions · 5.5% of ranked | $96,357 |
| 413 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $54,244 |
| 199 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $54,223 |
| 416 contributions · 3% of ranked | $52,347 |
Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,672,057) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $3,063,019
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,766 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 payments · 1% of all spending | $45,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.4% of all spending | $20,000 |
| 4 payments · 0.4% of all spending | $20,000 |
| 4 payments · 0.4% of all spending | $20,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.4% of all spending | $20,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.2% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.2% of all spending | $10,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.