Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
Hybrid PAC (qualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: Minnesota Second District Victory Committee
"holding Republicans accountable and helping Democrats win seats in the House" (Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00495028 · files monthly
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 70 | $410K · 75% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 2 | $135K · 25% |
| All recipients | 72 | $545K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| District of Columbia | 1 | $130K |
| California | 8 | $40K |
| Ohio | 4 | $30K |
| Virginia | 4 | $30K |
| Arizona | 4 | $30K |
| Florida | 6 | $30K |
| Michigan | 4 | $25K |
| Iowa | 3 | $25K |
The largest 8 of 28 states.
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $188.1M from 140 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $294,426,905
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 20,885 contributions · 44% | $32,928,671 |
| 8,349 contributions · 11% |
Total reported disbursements $178,154,630
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $118,107,483 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$178.2M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $75.7M, Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
"holding Republicans accountable and helping Democrats win seats in the House" Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile.
No pages quoted
HMP is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $130K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 3 payments | $4.9M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS · 3 payments | $4.3M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to DEMOCRACY PAC II · 2 payments | $4M |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA · 3 payments | $3M |
| PAC (qualified) · 3 payments | $2.3M |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION · 3 payments | $2M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to CARPENTERS LEGISLATIVE IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS · 2 payments | $2M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION · 3 payments | $1.9M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to EARN INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS · 6 payments | $1.3M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 3 payments | $1.1M |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to BRANCH 193 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE · 5 payments | $1M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $1M |
$34.6M from 53 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (nonqualified) · 5 payments | $2.1M |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 4 payments | $1.6M |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $1.4M |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $153K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $130K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BLUE TO THE FUTURE 2024 · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to MCCANN VICTORY FUND · 2 payments |
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $8,016,625 |
| 4,185 contributions · 8.8% | $6,673,770 |
| 4,190 contributions · 8.8% | $6,667,180 |
| 568 contributions · 5% | $3,788,803 |
| 6,070 contributions · 4.9% | $3,709,726 |
| 1,919 contributions · 3% | $2,289,455 |
| 485 contributions · 2.8% | $2,134,519 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 contributions · 15% of ranked | $8,500,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 5,570 contributions · 15% of ranked | $8,387,574 |
| 4 contributions · 7.7% of ranked | $4,300,000 |
| 3 contributions · 6.2% of ranked | $3,500,000 |
| 1 contribution · 5.3% of ranked | $3,000,000 |
| 2 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $2,550,000 |
| 4 contributions · 4.4% of ranked | $2,500,000 |
| 7 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $2,135,000 |
A further $18,918,973 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($10,148,587) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 94,703 contributions · 25% of ranked | $18,722,610 |
| 50 contributions · 14% of ranked | $10,380,530 |
| 104 contributions · 7.2% of ranked | $5,447,346 |
| 55 contributions · 6.1% of ranked | $4,564,974 |
| 18 contributions · 5.7% of ranked | $4,310,570 |
| 48 contributions · 5.1% of ranked | $3,869,431 |
| 147 contributions · 4.7% of ranked | $3,501,323 |
| 6 contributions · 4.4% of ranked | $3,300,000 |
A further $192,318 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($10,148,587) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $13,236,965
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 475 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
20 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $44,654 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 27 payments · 2.2% of all spending | $3,988,883 |
| 5 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $2,080,435 |
| 4 payments · 0.9% of all spending | $1,600,380 |
| 2 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $1,440,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $1,320,718 |
| 34 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $1,233,932 |
| 187 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $584,748 |
| 30 payments · 0.1% of all spending | $209,540 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to LANDSMAN VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NEW POLITICS NEXT MISSION FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NEW POLITICS NEXT MISSION FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to DEM RISING 2026 · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BLUE DOG VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
$5.8M across 77 recipient committees, or 3.3% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.