Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › MI-10 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, MI-10
Has not served in Congress
7 priorities from bouchardforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Macomb County is the engine of our economy — the Arsenal of Democracy — and a symbol of American strength. We make great things here in Michigan, and we need to keep it that way. Our workers built the middle class, powered American industry, and helped win two world wars.
I support President Trump’s efforts to protect Michigan manufacturing, defend American jobs, and ensure that our workers — not China or Washington bureaucrats — shape the future of our economy. That means bringing manufacturing jobs back home and cutting red tape that crushes small businesses.
When we put American workers first, we build a stronger, more secure future for our families. Together, we can keep building things, creating opportunities, and making America stronger than ever.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bouchardforcongress.com/a-3-lightbox.html
Heading as listed on bouchardforcongress.com ↗ (opens bouchardforcongress.com at this heading)
Having led missions to the Southern Border during President Trump’s first term, I saw firsthand the sophistication of the cartels that smuggle deadly fentanyl into our country and poison our communities. What I witnessed wasn’t just a crisis — it was a national security emergency. Border Patrol is fighting a battle against well-funded criminal networks, and Washington must give them the tools, technology, and policies they need to win.
I stand for finishing the wall, restoring the “Remain in Mexico” policy, and ending catch-and-release once and for all. We must secure the border, stop the flow of illegal drugs, and deport criminal illegals who endanger our citizens. Security starts with controlling who comes into our country, protecting our communities, and putting American families first.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bouchardforcongress.com/a-4-lightbox.html
Heading as listed on bouchardforcongress.com ↗ (opens bouchardforcongress.com at this heading)
Our schools are supposed to teach kids the basics — reading, writing, math, and science — and prepare them for the future. But too many schools have lost focus. Test scores are falling, teachers are overwhelmed, and politics have crept into the classroom. That needs to change.
I’ll fight to get our schools back to the basics and make sure every child has the tools to succeed — whether that means learning a trade, going to college, or starting a business.
In Congress, I’ll back a Parents’ Bill of Rights, so moms and dads always have a say in what their kids are being taught. Parents should be partners in education, not kept in the dark.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bouchardforcongress.com/a-5-lightbox.html
Heading as listed on bouchardforcongress.com ↗ (opens bouchardforcongress.com at this heading)
Inflation and everyday prices are out of control.
Families spend too much of their hard-earned paychecks on essentials. We need policies that look out for families and lower costs.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bouchardforcongress.com/a-6-lightbox.html
Heading as listed on bouchardforcongress.com ↗ (opens bouchardforcongress.com at this heading)
You paid into these safety-net programs and they need to be there for you. I will always protect Medicare and Social Security. We need to root out the waste and the fraud that threatens these critical programs.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bouchardforcongress.com/a-7-lightbox.html
Heading as listed on bouchardforcongress.com ↗ (opens bouchardforcongress.com at this heading)
I want you to pick the health care that works for you and your family. It should be low cost, high quality, and transparent about what you are paying for. My opponent wants to pick your health care for you, in a one-size fits all socialist program. It would cost trillions and raise all of our taxes. I want you to pick the health care you want. The choice couldn’t be clearer.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bouchardforcongress.com/a-8-lightbox.html
Heading as listed on bouchardforcongress.com ↗ (opens bouchardforcongress.com at this heading)
1. End the current conflict with Iran. The first step to lowering gas prices is to end the current conflict with Iran, open up the Straits of Hormuz and get oil delivery flowing across the world.
2. Suspend the state and federal gas tax: Families need relief. We should temporarily suspend the state and federal gas tax to provide lower prices at the pump and lower prices for goods all around.
3. Energy independence: We need to be more energy independent. The current conflict shows that we can’t depend on other areas of the world for oil and gas.
4. Open up more distribution: Open up the Keystone Pipeline, Line 5 and other distribution systems to make oil and petroleum more accessible to refineries.
5. Open up more refineries: We need more refineries producing gas. Refineries are at capacity. We need access to more refineries to make more gas.
6. End the green new deal approach: We need to have an all of the above energy solutions. My opponent agrees with climate changes activists like Jane Fonda who want to eliminate fossil fuels. That’s dangerous, a non-starter and will make prices too high for families.
Lowering gas prices is a good start that will lower all prices. End the war, suspend the gas tax, and have more energy independence is the way.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bouchardforcongress.com/a-9-lightbox.html
Heading as listed on bouchardforcongress.com ↗ (opens bouchardforcongress.com at this heading)
FEC filings, Apr 8, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00925743
42¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 6 reports ($1.1M of $2.7M). Cash on hand went from $520K on Dec 31, 2025 to $1.6M on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $550,591 | $30,572 | $520,020 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $426,708 | $99,330 | $847,397 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $409,322 | $178,818 | $1,077,901 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 15, 2026 | $28,102 | $147,773 | $958,230 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $942,583 | $514,571 | $1,386,243 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $315,415 | $141,673 | $1,559,984 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
25 endorsers listed on Michael Bouchard Jr.’s own campaign site: 18 officials, 1 union, 5 organizations, 1 person.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Rep. (MI-1)
Rep. (OH-4)
Rep. (MT-1)
Rep. (CO-8)
Fmr. U.S. Senator
Rep. (TX-6)
Fmr. Governor
Fmr. Ambassador
Pastor
Advanced · 45,473 votes (72%) · 1 of 4 · Full results ↗
Won · 145,735 votes (47%) · 1 of 5 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 506 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.2M.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 3 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 3 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $127.6K.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 91 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $257.9K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $2,884,259
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
88% of the money placed by state came from inside Michigan: $1M of $1.2M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 357 contributions · 88% | $1,016,769 |
| 44 contributions · 4% | $46,969 |
| 3 contributions · 1.3% | $14,500 |
| 4 contributions · 1.2% | $14,478 |
| 10 contributions · 1% | $11,600 |
| 5 contributions · 0.9% | $11,000 |
| 5 contributions · 0.8% | $9,041 |
| 8 contributions · 0.8% | $8,804 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 29 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 161 contributions · 17% of ranked | $189,905 |
| Written instead of an employer · 51 contributions · 9.3% of ranked | $102,728 |
| 3 contributions · 3% of ranked | $33,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 6 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $15,200 |
| 2 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $15,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $15,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.3% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.3% of ranked | $14,000 |
A further $40,773 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($204,673) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $31,609 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $571,215
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 660 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
14 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $22,169 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 115 payments · 9.3% of all spending | $122,369 |
| 3 payments · 5.4% of all spending | $70,218 |
| 9 payments · 4.2% of all spending | $54,601 |
| 8 payments · 3.6% of all spending | $46,594 |
| 15 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $32,109 |
| 99 payments · 2% of all spending | $26,626 |
| 6 payments · 2% of all spending | $26,312 |
| 7 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $18,994 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 161 contributions · 17% of ranked | $189,905 |
| 31 contributions · 9.7% of ranked | $109,851 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 29 contributions · 8% of ranked | $90,850 |
| 27 contributions · 6% of ranked | $67,919 |
| 10 contributions · 5.2% of ranked | $58,623 |
| 13 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $39,716 |
| 9 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $30,350 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 7 contributions · 2% of ranked | $22,200 |
A further $26,773 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($204,673) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.