Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) › 2025–2026
Super PAC (independent expenditure-only)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: League of Conservation Voters Action Fund
League of Conservation Voters PAC (Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00486845 · files monthly
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
“LCV Victory Fund is the largest political environmental organization investing at every level of the ballot to elect leaders who will advance climate goals.”
LCV Victory Fund, on its own site, lcvvictoryfund.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
2 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
LCV Victory Fund runs independent campaigns to defeat federal candidates who will undermine environmental progress and elect environmental champions who will prioritize just and equitable climate solutions.
Winning in 2026 Winning in 2026 ↗ (opens lcvvictoryfund.org at this heading)
Voters fed up with soaring energy bills want cheaper, cleaner energy.
Here’s how LCV Victory Fund will help elect pro-clean energy, pro-climate candidates to deliver.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · lcvvictoryfund.org
Heading as listed on lcvvictoryfund.org ↗ (opens lcvvictoryfund.org at this heading)
We’ll flip the U.S. House to put one lever of federal power back into the hands of pro-clean energy, pro-climate Democratic leadership and block Trump’s dangerous agenda.
We’ll protect existing Democratic seats in the U.S. Senate and pick up new seats, striving to secure a majority this year, or at minimum, make progress to win control in 2028.
We’ll support our state affiliates in electing pro-clean energy and climate candidates to the governors’ offices, state legislatures, and local offices that have an outsized impact on clean energy and climate policies.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · lcvvictoryfund.org/climate-vote-2026
Heading as listed on lcvvictoryfund.org/climate-vote-2026 ↗ (opens lcvvictoryfund.org/climate-vote-2026 at this heading) · “Climate Vote 2026:” on lcvvictoryfund.org/climate-vote-2026 ↗ (opens lcvvictoryfund.org/climate-vote-2026 at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Other PACs and committees | 7 | $1.6M · 100% |
| All recipients | 7 | $1.6M |
No recipient here is matched to a candidate with a state on record.
Bars drawn to $500.8K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to DEMOCRACY PAC II · 1 payment | $500K |
$500K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 2 payments | $500.8K |
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 2,869 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $3.2M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The largest of the committees is listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
The 5 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $942.9K from 5 sources in all.
Total reported receipts $45,010,915
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 400 contributions · 34% | $1,073,078 |
| 281 contributions · 32% | $997,707 |
| 735 contributions · 15% | $483,575 |
Total reported disbursements $33,349,061
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $26,076,915 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$33.3M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $14.3M, Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending. The line stops at the latest report, through Oct 14, 2026, at the dashed rule; elections after it are marked where they fall.
No lobbying disclosures matched
League of Conservation Voters PAC Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
LCV Victory Fund is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| $500K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $250K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · Connected to MINNESOTA SECOND DISTRICT VICTORY COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $110K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $100K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $100K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to WINSENATE · 1 payment | $50K |
From the 7 largest of 8 recipient committees: $1.6M, or 4.8% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $136,945 |
| 90 contributions · 2% | $64,070 |
| 87 contributions · 2% | $62,668 |
| 30 contributions · 1.9% | $59,100 |
| 28 contributions · 1.3% | $42,125 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1,604 contributions · 29% of ranked | $910,308 |
| 1 contribution · 19% of ranked | $600,000 |
| 1 contribution · 12% of ranked | $375,000 |
| 1 contribution · 12% of ranked | $375,000 |
| 1 contribution · 9.5% of ranked | $300,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 430 contributions · 5.9% of ranked | $184,675 |
| 21 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $115,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $40,000 |
A further $2,225 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($223,068) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,452 contributions · 29% of ranked | $898,828 |
| 1 contribution · 19% of ranked | $600,000 |
| 1 contribution · 12% of ranked | $375,000 |
| 1 contribution · 12% of ranked | $375,000 |
| 1 contribution · 9.5% of ranked | $300,000 |
| 22 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $155,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.6% of ranked | $50,000 |
| 11 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $46,200 |
A further $1,875 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($223,068) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $2,808,808
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 993 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
21 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $22,091 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 payments · 1.5% of all spending | $500,799 |
| 1 payment · 1.5% of all spending | $500,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.7% of all spending | $250,000 |
| 5 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $245,250 |
| 200 payments · 0.6% of all spending | $197,860 |
| 2 payments · 0.5% of all spending | $162,067 |
| 1 payment · 0.3% of all spending | $110,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.3% of all spending | $100,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.