Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) › 2025–2026
Super PAC (independent expenditure-only)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: Winsenate
Active - Quarterly Super PAC (Independent Expenditure-Only) - Unauthorized ID: C00484642 Registration date: June 11, 2010 (Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00484642 · files quarterly
“Senate Majority PAC was founded by experienced, aggressive Democratic strategists with one mission: Protect and expand the number of Democrats in the U.S. Senate. See our political action committee’s work to increase Senate Democratic leadership.”
SMP, on its own site, senatemajority.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
2 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Supporting the Democratic Party by working to grow the number of Democrats in the U.S. Senate.
Does your state have a Senate election in 2026?
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · senatemajority.com
Senate Majority PAC was founded by experienced, aggressive Democratic strategists with one mission: Protect and expand the number of Democrats in the U.S. Senate.
See our political action committee’s work to increase Senate Democratic leadership.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · senatemajority.com/our-work
Heading as listed on senatemajority.com ↗ (opens senatemajority.com at this heading)
Senate Majority PAC was founded by experienced, aggressive Democratic strategists with one mission: To win Senate races.
In 2010, the Citizens United decision led to a network of Republican-aligned outside groups that raised and spent hundreds of millions of dollars on false negative ads against Democratic senators and Senate candidates.
In the face of this threat, Senate Majority PAC formed in 2011 to make sure that our Democratic candidates would not be forced to face such overwhelming odds against them again.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · senatemajority.com/about-us
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Other PACs and committees | 4 | $26.3M · 100% |
| All recipients | 4 | $26.3M |
No recipient here is matched to a candidate with a state on record.
Bars drawn to $17.5M, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to DEMOCRACY PAC II · 2 payments | $9M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS · 3 payments | $2.5M |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to PLUMBERS & STEAMFITTERS LOCAL 22 PAC INC · 1 payment | $2M |
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 26,872 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $59.1M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 3 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $1.1M from 3 sources in all.
Total reported receipts $354,393,595
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4,699 contributions · 25% | $14,825,550 |
| 1,011 contributions · 18% | $10,696,101 |
Total reported disbursements $330,841,403
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$330.8M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $165.2M, Jul 1 – Sep 30, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Active - Quarterly Super PAC (Independent Expenditure-Only) - Unauthorized ID: C00484642 Registration date: June 11, 2010 Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
SMP is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| $1.8M |
| PAC (qualified) · 3 payments | $1.8M |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA · 2 payments | $1.5M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to EARN INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS · 6 payments | $1.3M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to SMP · 2 payments | $1.1M |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS · 5 payments | $1.1M |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATION · 2 payments | $1.1M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to CARPENTERS LEGISLATIVE IMPROVEMENT COMMITTEE UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS · 1 payment | $1M |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to BRANCH 193 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LETTER CARRIERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE · 4 payments | $1M |
$32.1M from 33 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to SMP · 4 payments | $65M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 4 payments | $17.5M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to SMP · 3 payments | $10M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to FF PAC · 1 payment | $7M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to SMP · 2 payments | $4.9M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to SMP · 1 payment | $1.5M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $1M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to EMILY'S LIST · 1 payment | $820K |
$107.7M across 8 recipient committees, or 33% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
The 11 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
| 2,227 contributions · 14% | $8,243,870 |
| 912 contributions · 13% | $7,448,643 |
| 277 contributions · 6.1% | $3,587,540 |
| 479 contributions · 5.7% | $3,378,765 |
| 1,142 contributions · 4.6% | $2,748,555 |
| 390 contributions · 2.2% | $1,328,047 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1,515 contributions · 20% of ranked | $6,149,225 |
| 3 contributions · 9.6% of ranked | $3,000,000 |
| 2 contributions · 6.4% of ranked | $2,000,000 |
| 2 contributions · 6.4% of ranked | $2,000,000 |
| 1 contribution · 6.4% of ranked | $2,000,000 |
| 2 contributions · 6.4% of ranked | $2,000,000 |
| 9 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $1,150,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $1,000,000 |
A further $27,589,148 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Declined, N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($10,029,086) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 20,656 contributions · 45% of ranked | $26,439,614 |
| 43 contributions · 7.3% of ranked | $4,268,150 |
| 7 contributions · 7.1% of ranked | $4,201,200 |
| 26 contributions · 6.4% of ranked | $3,750,085 |
| 25 contributions · 4.6% of ranked | $2,725,682 |
| 4 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $2,011,000 |
| 22 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $2,002,205 |
| 2 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $2,000,000 |
A further $144,923 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($10,029,086) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $140,335,106
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,604 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
44 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $639,187 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4 payments · 20% of all spending | $65,020,000 |
| 4 payments · 5.3% of all spending | $17,500,000 |
| 36 payments · 3.9% of all spending | $13,022,037 |
| 3 payments · 3% of all spending | $10,000,000 |
| 1 payment · 2.1% of all spending | $7,000,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.5% of all spending | $4,900,000 |
| 18 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $3,726,312 |
| 18 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $2,169,624 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.