Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (qualified)Lobbyist/registrant PACLabor organizationWashington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
Political fund of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00027342 · files monthly
“In 1891, ten electrical workers met in St. Louis, Missouri, to form the first national union for the advancement and safety of those practicing a challenging and dangerous craft. From their efforts came a legacy of pride, skill and dedication: the foundation of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers. With hope and determination, they created an effective and respected union that has contributed to the well-being of men and women in all aspects of the industry for more than a century”
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the organization this committee is the political fund of, ibew.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
1 priority from the site of International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the organization this committee is the political fund of, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Diversity and inclusion aren’t just buzz words in the IBEW.
They’re an opportunity to grow our ranks, extend the opportunities of membership, and to create a workforce for the future that reflects the communities where we live and work.
A union that embraces people from all backgrounds and walks of life is a union that is poised to grow and expand opportunity for all its members.
It’s a union that is IBEW Strong.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · ibew.org/about-ibew/affinity-groups
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 269 | $1.7M · 38% |
| Republican candidates | 13 | $58.4K · 1.3% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 17 | $77.5K · 1.7% |
| Democratic party committees | 7 | $745K · 16% |
| Other PACs and committees | 114 | $2M · 43% |
| All recipients | 420 | $4.6M |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 39 | $264.5K |
| New York | 19 | $117.3K |
| Illinois | 18 | $107.8K |
| Michigan | 12 | $100K |
| Virginia | 11 | $82.5K |
| Texas | 20 | $82.5K |
| Florida | 11 | $80K |
| Pennsylvania | 13 | $79.5K |
The largest 8 of 49 states.
The 9 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $1.2M from 9 sources in all.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 4,116 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $327.2K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $15,452,178
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 297 contributions · 10% | $33,374 |
| 154 contributions · 5.9% | $19,350 |
Total reported disbursements $16,395,420
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Total itemized disbursements $4,530,833
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 741 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 5 payments · 6.7% of all spending | $1,100,000 |
$16.4M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $2.1M, October 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Besides giving through its PAC, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
The organization’s own reports give its total lobbying costs, including any firms it hired; each firm reports what this client paid it.
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $1.4M is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS”, found by searching “INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Oct 27, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Its FEC record names International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
Bars drawn to $1.1M, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · 7 payments | $11K |
$11K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to WINSENATE · 5 payments | $1.1M |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $300K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $210K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $210K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $80K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $50K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 3 payments | $46K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to TITUS · 3 payments | $15K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 2 payments | $15K |
| House campaign committee · 3 payments | $15K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to WALKINSHAW VICTORY FUND · 4 payments | $15K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $10K |
$4.6M across 439 recipient committees, or 28% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown. A further $15K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| 188 contributions · 5.7% |
| $18,530 |
| 269 contributions · 5.6% | $18,436 |
| 243 contributions · 5.6% | $18,342 |
| 129 contributions · 5% | $16,355 |
| 195 contributions · 4.9% | $16,157 |
| 258 contributions · 4.7% | $15,305 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2,165 contributions · 60% of ranked | $194,078 |
| 321 contributions · 10% of ranked | $33,151 |
| 224 contributions · 4.1% of ranked | $13,477 |
| 222 contributions · 4.1% of ranked | $13,435 |
| 172 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $11,892 |
| 250 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $11,735 |
| Written instead of an employer · 57 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $10,655 |
| 161 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $7,687 |
A further $1,300 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($13,866,137) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2,171 contributions · 42% of ranked | $136,097 |
| 209 contributions · 23% of ranked | $75,867 |
| 815 contributions · 13% of ranked | $42,411 |
| 133 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $12,092 |
| 169 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $10,355 |
| 69 contributions · 2% of ranked | $6,538 |
| 48 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $5,485 |
| 67 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $5,353 |
A further $400 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($13,866,137) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| $300,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $210,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $210,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.5% of all spending | $80,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.3% of all spending | $50,000 |
| 3 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $46,000 |
| 3 payments · <0.1% of all spending | $15,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.