Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) › 2025–2026
Super PAC (independent expenditure-only)Lobbyist/registrant PACChicago, IllinoisActive
Connected organization: National Association of Realtors
Political fund of National Association of Realtors
American real estate agent organization based in Chicago (Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00488742 · files monthly
This committee's own pages do not say what it is for. Its largest funder, National Association of Realtors, gave 99% of its money this cycle ($18.6M), and describes its purpose:
“To empower REALTORS® as they preserve, protect and advance the right to real property for all. Learn More”
National Association of Realtors, on its own site, nar.realtor
National Association of Realtors is a tax-exempt organization that does not have to disclose its own donors.
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words. A funder’s share is of this committee’s total receipts, from its itemized FEC filings.
81 priorities from the site of National Association of Realtors, the organization this committee is the political fund of, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
NAR urges Congress and the Administration to reauthorize and reform the National Flood Insurance Program and remove barriers to a more robust private market to offer higher quality, lower cost flood insurance.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · realtorparty.realtor/wp-content/uploads/appsDocs/resource-guide/advocacy-resource-guide.pdf
Austin Perez 5 Issue Staff Expert Global Climate Risk - NAR supports action that protects property rights while emphasizing environmental stewardship and voluntary local action, based on private sector, market-based investments to encourage energy efficiency, adaptation, and mitigation.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · narfocus.com/billdatabase/clientfiles/172/26/3233.pdf
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the government-sponsored enterprises or GSEs) play a key role in the secondary mortgage market, which is crucial in providing capital for mortgage lending.
During the housing finance sector's collapse, private capital withdrew from having a significant, competing role with the GSEs.
Without the government’s support of the GSEs and FHA-insured loans, which currently constitutes a large portion of the market space, there would be almost no capital available for mortgage lending.
Read NAR's Vision for Housing Finance Reform.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nar.realtor/fannie-mae-freddie-mac-gses
Since its establishment in 1944, the VA home loan guarantee program has helped millions of veterans purchase and maintain homes.
NAR believes this program is a vital homeownership tool that provides veterans with a centralized, affordable, and accessible method of purchasing homes as a benefit for their service to our nation.
NAR actively works to help veterans access their benefits and improve the program.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nar.realtor/veterans-affairs
Heading as listed on nar.realtor/advocacy/federal-advocacy ↗ (opens nar.realtor/advocacy/federal-advocacy at this heading) · “Advocacy at the Federal, State and Local Levels” on nar.realtor/advocacy ↗ (opens nar.realtor/advocacy at this heading)
Two new studies commissioned by the National Association of REALTORS® reveal that A Capital Gains Tax Cliff Is Coming That Will Hit Middle-Class Homeowners Hard.
The studies uncover the urgent need to modernize the federal capital gains exclusion for the sale of a primary residence—an outdated policy that’s increasingly locking up the housing market and discouraging mobility.
Homeowners are facing a looming tax penalty simply for staying in their homes too long.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nar.realtor/advocacy/federal-advocacy/nar-legislative-priorities
Heading as listed on nar.realtor/advocacy/federal-advocacy/nar-legislative-priorities ↗ (opens nar.realtor/advocacy/federal-advocacy/nar-legislative-priorities at this heading) · “NAR Legislative Priorities” on nar.realtor ↗ (opens nar.realtor at this heading)
Check out NAR's policy on rent control and NAR's Rent Control Toolkit to help you encourage policymakers on new housing development.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nar.realtor/rental-housing-issues
Rent control and rent stabilization are infringements upon private property rights.
NAR opposes current and future rent control and rent stabilization laws on both residential and commercial properties.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · realtorparty.realtor/wp-content/uploads/appsDocs/resource-guide/advocacy-resource-guide.pdf
Heading as listed on nar.realtor/rental-housing-issues ↗ (opens nar.realtor/rental-housing-issues at this heading) · “State, Local, and Federal Resources” on nar.realtor/rental-housing-issues ↗ (opens nar.realtor/rental-housing-issues at this heading)
NAR opposes policies and practices that have a disproportionately adverse effect on a demographic group defined by race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status, national origin, sexual orientation, or gender identity, unless such policies are justified by a legitimate business necessity and there is no less-discriminatory alternative.
NAR believes that eliminating disparate-impact discrimination, as defined by the Supreme Court in its 2015 Inclusive Communities decision, helps protect both the legitimate business interests of real estate professionals and the fair housing rights of consumers.
NAR supports the reinstatement of HUD’s 2013 disparate impact standard, as proposed by HUD in August of 2021.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · realtorparty.realtor/wp-content/uploads/appsDocs/resource-guide/advocacy-resource-guide.pdf
Heading as listed on nar.realtor/fair-housing ↗ (opens nar.realtor/fair-housing at this heading)
NAR supports clear website accessibility standards under the ADA, and has requested, and successfully received, guidance from the Department of Justice on this issue to curb demand letters for alleged violations by businesses.
NAR has also engaged with HUD and conducted research on Fair Housing Act-related claims on website accessibility.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · realtorparty.realtor/wp-content/uploads/appsDocs/resource-guide/advocacy-resource-guide.pdf
Heading as listed on nar.realtor/fair-housing ↗ (opens nar.realtor/fair-housing at this heading)
NAR opposes any erosion of the statutory provision of the the Internal Revenue Code Section 3508, which provides clear directives about how a real estate broker may classify his/her sales agents as independent contractors.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nar.realtor/independent-contractor-status
NAR strongly supports the continued right of brokers to choose whether to treat and classify agents as employees or independent contractors for federal tax purposes; and supports actions at the state level to strengthen the rights of brokers to make these determinations and opposes efforts at the federal level to weaken those rights.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · realtorparty.realtor/wp-content/uploads/appsDocs/resource-guide/advocacy-resource-guide.pdf
NAR strongly supports the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) single-family mortgage insurance program, which has been a cornerstone of homeownership access since 1934.
FHA plays a vital role in the mortgage marketplace by providing safe, affordable financing to consumers who might not qualify for conventional loans, particularly first-time buyers and those in underserved communities.
FHA financing helps borrowers address a range of housing needs, from purchase financing to manufactured housing and home renovation.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nar.realtor/fha
Heading as listed on nar.realtor/fha ↗ (opens nar.realtor/fha at this heading)
Essential Rural Housing Programs for Homebuyers ↗ (opens nar.realtor/rural-housing-programs at this heading)
Rural families face unique challenges in accessing safe, affordable housing and financing.
Rural incomes are generally lower than in urban areas, while construction costs are higher due to smaller scale development and limited access to credit, which reduces private investment.
USDA Rural Housing Service (RHS) programs provide essential financing tools to address these market gaps, offering direct loans, loan guarantees, and repair assistance to help rural families access decent, affordable housing.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nar.realtor/rural-housing-programs
NAR supports meaningful enforcement of the Fair Housing Act’s requirement that jurisdictions receiving federal assistance should assess the impact of that spending on local patterns of segregation and disinvestment.
NAR opposed the repeal of HUD’s 2015 AFFH rule and supports issuance of a new rule creating a simpler process for communities to assess barriers to fair housing and develop local solutions to overcome them.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · realtorparty.realtor/wp-content/uploads/appsDocs/resource-guide/advocacy-resource-guide.pdf
NAR supports legislative and regulatory proposals to remove disincentives that inhibit owner participation in the development of new rental housing or the preservation of existing safe and affordable rental housing.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · realtorparty.realtor/wp-content/uploads/appsDocs/resource-guide/advocacy-resource-guide.pdf
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Other PACs and committees | 7 | $22.1M · 100% |
| All recipients | 7 | $22.1M |
No recipient here is matched to a candidate with a state on record.
Bars drawn to $10.8M, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS · 1 payment | $2M |
$2M from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 4 payments | $10.8M |
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 4 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 19 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $48.5K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Total reported receipts $22,221,786
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 19 contributions · 100% | $48,480 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 19 contributions · 100% of ranked | $48,480 |
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Total reported disbursements $22,155,854
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Total itemized disbursements $22,155,854
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 37 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
$22.2M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $12M, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
American real estate agent organization based in Chicago Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
National Association of Realtors Congressional Fund is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| $4.3M |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · Connected to PROTECT THE HOUSE 2024 · 2 payments | $3.5M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to WINSENATE · 3 payments | $2.5M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $250K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to FRIENDS OF ANDY BARR COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $100K |
$21.4M across 6 recipient committees, or 96% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4 payments · 49% of all spending | $10,750,000 |
| 3 payments · 19% of all spending | $4,250,000 |
| 2 payments · 16% of all spending | $3,500,000 |
| 3 payments · 11% of all spending | $2,500,000 |
| 1 payment · 3.4% of all spending | $750,000 |
| 1 payment · 1.1% of all spending | $250,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.5% of all spending | $100,000 |
| 17 payments · 0.2% of all spending | $44,718 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.