Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00007922 · files monthly
“LIUNA PAC is the federal political action committee of the Laborers’ International Union of North America (LIUNA).
LIUNA PAC supports the advancement of the interests of LIUNA members, their families, the labor movement and all working people through contributions and expenditures in federal and state elections.”
Laborers' International Union of North America PAC, on its own site, liunapac.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 202 | $1,235,000 | $0 | $1,235,000 | 85% |
| Republican | 24 | $141,000 | $0 | $141,000 | 9.7% |
| Other or unresolved | 20 | $71,000 | $4,014 | $75,014 | 5.2% |
| Shown support | 246 | $1,447,000 | $4,014 | $1,451,014 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 284 | $1.6M · 19% |
| Republican candidates | 29 | $166K · 1.9% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 19 | $71K · 0.8% |
| Democratic party committees | 6 | $325K · 3.8% |
| Republican party committees | 2 | $10K · 0.1% |
| Other party committees | 4 | $450K · 5.2% |
| Other PACs and committees | 92 | $5.9M · 69% |
| All recipients | 436 | $8.6M |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 48 | $391K |
| New York | 22 | $115.5K |
| Pennsylvania | 15 | $102.5K |
| Illinois | 23 | $99K |
| Massachusetts | 12 | $92.5K |
| New Jersey | 21 |
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 9,781 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.1M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $8,429,409
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2,196 contributions · 26% | $279,623 |
| 1,884 contributions · 22% | $244,563 |
| 1,305 contributions · 15% | $165,011 |
Total reported disbursements $8,863,979
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $4,014 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$8.9M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $2.9M, Oct 1 – Oct 14, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
2000 cycleReport released Oct 26, 2004
Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
Besides giving through its PAC, Laborers' International Union of North America pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
The organization’s own reports give its total lobbying costs, including any firms it hired; each firm reports what this client paid it.
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $1.2M is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA”, found by searching “LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Oct 27, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
Laborers' International Union of North America PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Its FEC record names Laborers' International Union of North America as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Laborers' International Union of North America PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
| Ohio | 11 | $83.5K |
|---|
| Florida | 17 | $81.5K |
|---|
The largest 8 of 44 states.
Bars drawn to $3M, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA (LIUNA) PAC · 18 payments | $935.8K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $338.7K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to LABORERS' INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA · 2 payments | $130K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to LIUNA PAC · 1 payment | $39.2K |
$1.4M from 4 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · Connected to MINNESOTA SECOND DISTRICT VICTORY COMMITTEE · 3 payments | $3M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to WINSENATE · 2 payments | $1.5M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $500K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 8 payments | $300K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $235K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 6 payments | $210K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 6 payments | $205K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to KATIE HOBBS VICTORY FUND · 1 payment |
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $56,179 |
| 524 contributions · 5% | $54,384 |
| 361 contributions · 2.9% | $30,995 |
| 447 contributions · 2.8% | $30,476 |
| 203 contributions · 2.7% | $28,814 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 960 contributions · 14% of ranked | $146,697 |
| 335 contributions · 5.1% of ranked | $53,139 |
| 232 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $46,860 |
| 293 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $30,416 |
| 294 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $28,265 |
| 238 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $21,891 |
| 97 contributions · 2% of ranked | $21,028 |
| 139 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $18,639 |
A further $45,244 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($5,115,328) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 876 contributions · 13% of ranked | $142,420 |
| 413 contributions · 6.7% of ranked | $73,183 |
| 730 contributions · 6% of ranked | $65,089 |
| 402 contributions · 4.8% of ranked | $52,594 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 754 contributions · 4.1% of ranked | $44,090 |
| 515 contributions · 4% of ranked | $42,999 |
| 173 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $33,914 |
| 316 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $25,721 |
A further $1,198 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($5,115,328) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $8,553,369
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 709 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3 payments · 34% of all spending | $3,000,000 |
| 2 payments · 17% of all spending | $1,500,000 |
| 1 payment · 5.6% of all spending | $500,000 |
| 8 payments · 3.4% of all spending | $300,000 |
| 1 payment · 2.7% of all spending | $235,000 |
| 6 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $210,000 |
| 6 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $205,000 |
| 1 payment · 1.1% of all spending | $100,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| $100K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to COLE COMBINED COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $30K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $25K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to EMMER MAJORITY BUILDERS · 3 payments | $15K |
$8.6M across 379 recipient committees, or 97% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.