Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00802389 · files monthly
19 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Every contribution builds momentum for climate action, strengthens our democracy, and helps elect leaders who put people and planet first.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · givegreen.com
When climate champions win elections, they pass the policies that protect our communities, safeguard our democracy, and move us toward a just, sustainable future.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · givegreen.com
Heading as listed on givegreen.com ↗ (opens givegreen.com at this heading)
Heading as listed on givegreen.com ↗ (opens givegreen.com at this heading)
Transitioning to 100 percent clean electricity is critical to tackling the climate crisis as it presents huge economic opportunities and is extremely popular.
Clean energy use has grown rapidly as technology prices have plummeted and is now more affordable than fossil fuels.
In fact, 75 percent of new utility-scale generation added in 2022 was from renewables.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · givegreen.com/issues/clean-energy-transition
The transportation sector is the largest single source of climate pollution in the United States.
Its health-harming pollution sickens and cuts short the lives of tens of thousands each year, especially in communities of low wealth and communities of color, who are disproportionately exposed to tailpipe pollution.
While trucks and buses only account for four percent of vehicles on the road, they are responsible for more than 25 percent of all transportation emissions.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · givegreen.com/issues/clean-and-equitable-transportation
Racial and economic inequalities in our country and the systems that perpetuate these forces have concentrated toxic polluters near and within Black, Indigenous and communities of color and low-wealth communities, who consequently experience disproportionate negative health, environmental, and economic impacts.
Climate change’s impacts hit low-wealth communities and communities of color the hardest, exacerbating systemic racial and economic inequities.
Confronting and rectifying these environmental injustices is imperative as we work to tackle the climate crisis and create a cleaner, safer, and more sustainable future.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · givegreen.com/issues/environmental-climate-justice
Having access to clean, safe and affordable drinking water regardless of race, income or zip code is a human right.
However, far too many people still worry if their tap water is contaminated with lead, arsenic, PFAS and forever chemicals, and other hazardous substances that put the lives and health of them and their families at risk.
The Clean Water Act is one of the country’s most successful environmental laws, improving our water quality while the country has enjoyed enormous population and economic growth.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · givegreen.com/issues/clean-water
We must achieve meaningful and equitable reductions in the pollution that is fueling the climate crisis.
Recent scientific analysis has indicated that current global fossil fuel reserves — those already leased or owned by fossil fuel companies — contain significantly more carbon than can be burned and emitted into the atmosphere if we hope to keep the planet’s warming below 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.
This includes accelerating the transition to responsibly-sited clean and renewable energy sources, rapidly phasing down fossil fuel extraction and use, ending oil and gas drilling on our public lands and waters, and stopping the expansion of fossil fuel infrastructure, especially methane gas export infrastructure.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · givegreen.com/issues/no-new-fossil-infrastructure
Transitioning to 100 percent clean electricity is critical to tackling the climate crisis.
It presents a huge economic opportunity, and it is extremely popular, with the majority of people supporting government investment in this critical transition.
Rapid deployment of clean renewable energy sources – like wind, solar, and geothermal – must be paired with policies to improve energy efficiency, energy storage, electricity transmission, and on our grids.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · givegreen.com/issues/clean-energy-grid-upgrades
Study after study continues to confirm longstanding common sense and science —burning fossil fuels and other polluting industries produce air pollution that causes health problems like asthma, heart attacks, cancer, developmental delays, and even premature death.
Communities of low wealth and communities of color are disproportionately exposed to those health harming pollutants and suffer from the associated negative health effects.
It is critical that as our understanding of the health impacts and the environmental injustice associated with these pollutants advances, the federal government and legislative actions correspondingly protect the communities, groups, and life stages most exposed or harmed by the pollutants.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · givegreen.com/issues/clean-air-public-health
The climate crisis has already begun impacting America’s farmers and ranchers – threatening their future, the health of rural communities, and our food security.
Fortunately, there are established agricultural programs that benefit farmers and help us fight the climate crisis at the same time.
USDA’s voluntary and incentive-based conservation programs provide financial and technical assistance to farmers and ranchers to adopt hundreds of land stewardship practices, including climate-smart practices that can reduce methane and nitrous oxide emissions and build soil carbon.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · givegreen.com/issues/climate-smart-agriculture
The decline of nature is a direct threat to the nation’s wildlife, clean air and water, the ability to fight climate change, and a healthy economy.
Among the best ways of solving this nature crisis — and ensuring that all people in this country have equitable access to nature — is to conserve more land and water in a natural state.
We must protect 30% of America’s lands and waters by 2030 – our part in a global, science-backed effort to protect 30% of Earth’s land and ocean by 2030, dubbed 30×30.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · givegreen.com/issues/public-lands-oceans
The Endangered Species Act (ESA) is facing unprecedented attacks that threaten some of our nation’s most important species.
At the same time, the climate crisis and irresponsible development are leading to catastrophic losses of plant and animal species across the world.
Some biologists estimate that 35% of animals and plants could become extinct in the wild by 2050 due to climate change alone.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · givegreen.com/issues/endangered-species
We can’t have a healthy environment without a healthy democracy, and we can’t have a healthy democracy without protecting the right to vote.
It’s important that Congressional leaders champion pro-democracy legislation like the Freedom to Vote Act, the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, DC Statehood, and more.
We must ensure all eligible voters are able to register, vote, and have their vote counted; to fully fund and secure our critical election infrastructure; to combat voter suppression and gerrymandering; and to reduce the corrosive influence of big polluter money in politics.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · givegreen.com/issues/protecting-democracy
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS ACTION FUND · 2 payments | $500.8K |
$500.8K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
No disbursements to other committees were itemized this cycle.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
The largest of the committees is listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Total reported receipts $2,517,642
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Total reported disbursements $3,308,107
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $19,830 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$3.3M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $322.1K, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Givegreen United Action is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Super PAC (independent expenditure-only). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Givegreen United Action is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Total itemized disbursements $2,965,451
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 761 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
20 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $133,898 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 269 payments · 30% of all spending | $999,945 |
| 21 payments · 27% of all spending | $877,091 |
| 19 payments · 5.2% of all spending | $172,374 |
| 13 payments · 4.9% of all spending | $162,668 |
| 20 payments · 4.7% of all spending | $156,993 |
| 20 payments · 4% of all spending | $133,898 |
| 9 payments · 4% of all spending | $131,434 |
| 16 payments · 3.5% of all spending | $115,431 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.