Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › Ohio U.S. Senate race › 2025–2026
DemocraticU.S. SenateOhio
Has not served in Congress
5 priorities from sherrodbrown.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
It’s time to ban health insurance companies from denying the care your doctor says you need. And if they try to deny your claims, we’ll fine them. Your care should be between you and your doctor. You work too hard and pay too much for the insurance companies to prevent you from getting the treatment your doctor prescribes.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sherrodbrown.com/our-fight
Heading as listed on sherrodbrown.com/our-fight ↗ (opens sherrodbrown.com/our-fight at this heading)
Let’s make it illegal for drug companies to charge Americans more than they do in other countries, because the same pill should be the same price. Folks in Toledo shouldn’t pay more for medication than folks in Toronto. Americans are getting ripped off by the drug companies because Congress won’t hold them accountable, but I will.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sherrodbrown.com/our-fight
Heading as listed on sherrodbrown.com/our-fight ↗ (opens sherrodbrown.com/our-fight at this heading)
Jon Husted gave $2.5 billion in out-of-control tax breaks to big corporations bringing data centers to our state. They gobble up energy, devour our land, suck up our water, then they leave you with the bill – not anymore. We’re fighting to require data centers to pay the full cost of their utilities so your bills don’t go up. Ohioans shouldn’t be forced to subsidize these costs and Ohioans – not Jon Husted and his billionaire friends – should get to decide if data centers are built in their community. Ohio deserves a leader who will fight to protect our communities instead of plotting to give sweetheart tax breaks to giant corporations.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sherrodbrown.com/our-fight
Heading as listed on sherrodbrown.com/our-fight ↗ (opens sherrodbrown.com/our-fight at this heading)
While utility CEOs are raking in millions of dollars a year, your rates keep going up and up and up. Now, utilities cost more than ever and for many hardworking families, it’s impossible to keep up. We’re fighting to cap how much utility companies can raise your rates, to make sure your bills are affordable and predictable. We’ll take on the utility companies because no Ohioan should have to choose between keeping the lights on and putting food on the table.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sherrodbrown.com/our-fight
Heading as listed on sherrodbrown.com/our-fight ↗ (opens sherrodbrown.com/our-fight at this heading)
We’re going to take on the politicians who are more interested in enriching themselves than they are in serving you. Last year, members of Congress made more than $635 million in stock trades. No wonder they’re not standing up to corporations – they’re too busy lining their own pockets. And what’s worse, I bet you’re not even surprised by that. No one – NO ONE – who serves in Congress, or their spouse, should be able to trade stocks. They also shouldn’t be able to turn around when they leave office and become a lobbyist. If you can’t agree to that, you shouldn’t be in public office.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sherrodbrown.com/our-fight
Heading as listed on sherrodbrown.com/our-fight ↗ (opens sherrodbrown.com/our-fight at this heading)
FEC filings, Aug 11, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00916288
93¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 7 reports ($64M of $68.4M). Cash on hand went from $5.9M on Sep 30, 2025 to $4.5M on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $7,022,464 | $1,076,575 | $5,945,889 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $7,333,987 | $3,380,234 | $9,899,642 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $10,114,957 | $3,500,138 | $16,514,461 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Apr 15, 2026 | $1,508,560 | $994,380 | $17,028,642 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $12,586,266 | $13,385,167 | $16,229,741 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $23,120,586 | $34,488,875 | $4,861,452 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $6,722,380 | $7,131,029 | $4,452,803 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Not read yet
Advanced · 708,005 votes (89%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Sherrod Brown leads Jon Husted by 2.8 pointsAverage of the 5 latest nonpartisan polls
Latest poll · Suffolk University, Oct 26, 2026
A poll is a snapshot, not a forecast.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 134,464 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $17.8M.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 12 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 28 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $6.8M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 163 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $650.5K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $68,409,200
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
38% of the money placed by state came from inside Ohio: $6.8M of $17.8M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 59,028 contributions · 38% | $6,788,747 |
| 14,225 contributions · 12% | $2,158,196 |
| 6,640 contributions · 8.3% | $1,478,679 |
| 4,499 contributions · 5.9% | $1,055,748 |
| 2,933 contributions · 3.3% | $581,083 |
| 2,997 contributions · 2.9% | $519,383 |
| 1,503 contributions · 2.6% | $460,958 |
| 2,974 contributions · 2.3% | $412,562 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 56 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 107,073 contributions · 82% of ranked | $11,926,442 |
| Written instead of an employer · 6,607 contributions · 8.5% of ranked | $1,244,545 |
| 212 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $44,208 |
| 178 contributions · 0.2% of ranked | $34,433 |
| 6 contributions · 0.1% of ranked | $18,500 |
| 84 contributions · 0.1% of ranked | $16,119 |
| 109 contributions · 0.1% of ranked | $15,124 |
| 4 contributions · <0.1% of ranked | $14,000 |
A further $264,105 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($22,438,141) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $662,419 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $29,176,500
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 2,526 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
100 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $2,908,114 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 12 payments · 16% of all spending | $10,117,102 |
| 120 payments · 9.1% of all spending | $5,819,952 |
| 13 payments · 6.2% of all spending | $3,968,579 |
| 98 payments · 4.3% of all spending | $2,752,410 |
| 33 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $1,558,690 |
| 74 payments · 1.7% of all spending | $1,104,829 |
| 13 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $1,026,722 |
| 9 payments · 0.5% of all spending | $297,310 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 94,782 contributions · 56% of ranked | $9,288,029 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 12,354 contributions · 16% of ranked | $2,612,053 |
| 3,105 contributions · 6.3% of ranked | $1,044,500 |
| 1,325 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $303,091 |
| 801 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $220,032 |
| 1,128 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $192,576 |
| 190 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $123,089 |
| 200 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $118,410 |
A further $272,405 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($22,438,141) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.