Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › MI-08 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, MI-08
Representative since 2025
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
5 priorities from kristenmcdonaldrivet.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Washington is broken – while families are falling further and further behind, politicians and special interests are cashing in. In order to make actual progress, we need to fix the systems that are failing us. First of all, no one should be profiting from their position in elected office. Kristen worked with both parties to introduce legislation to make it illegal for members of Congress to trade stock or participate in prediction markets where they have insider information.
Next, Kristen is fighting to get big, unlimited money out of politics, leading efforts to reverse Citizens United. Kristen also knows that voters should pick their leaders, not the other way around, so she supports bills to expand Michigan’s anti-gerrymandering practices to the rest of the country. Kristen is not scared to take on special interests, and when members of either party put themselves over our communities, Kristen fights back.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · kristenmcdonaldrivet.com/priority/fixing-a-broken-system
Heading as listed on kristenmcdonaldrivet.com ↗ (opens kristenmcdonaldrivet.com at this heading)
As a mother of six kids, Kristen knows firsthand how rising prices are affecting Michigan families. That’s why she is laser-focused on providing relief and lowering costs. In the State Senate, she passed the largest tax cut for working families in Michigan’s history and ended Michigan’s burdensome retirement tax.
In Congress, Kristen led the effort to pass through the House a tax cut for families buying healthcare. She is working to force prescription drug companies to negotiate prices with Medicaid, put an end to reckless tariffs, and stop Wall Street from buying up our housing. She is also a leader of a bipartisan group of members focused on cutting red tape that is causing sky-high costs of utilities and housing.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · kristenmcdonaldrivet.com/priority/lowering-costs-2
Heading as listed on kristenmcdonaldrivet.com ↗ (opens kristenmcdonaldrivet.com at this heading)
The current state of healthcare in America is crushing working families. MAGA’s $1 trillion cut to Medicaid made things much worse, causing premiums to rise 17% for working families in Michigan. For Mid-Michigan to thrive, healthcare must be affordable and accessible for everybody.
Kristen led the effort to pass through the House a tax cut for families buying healthcare, and she is fighting to let every American have the choice to buy into Medicare. She wrote bipartisan legislation to make pricing more transparent, and she is standing up to pharmaceutical companies by working to force them to negotiate prices with Medicaid.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · kristenmcdonaldrivet.com/priority/healthcare-we-can-afford
Heading as listed on kristenmcdonaldrivet.com ↗ (opens kristenmcdonaldrivet.com at this heading)
Kristen knows that for mid-Michigan families to thrive, they need to feel and be safe. For far too long, local police and sheriffs have been underfunded, and Kristen is working to fix that. As a Bay City Commissioner, she increased funding to hire additional officers, and in the state Senate, she brought back to local departments millions to fund more officers, tools, and training.
In Congress, Kristen has secured millions in federal investments into our local departments, and she co-sponsors the bipartisan bill to fully fund local law enforcement.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · kristenmcdonaldrivet.com/priority/supporting-public-safety
Heading as listed on kristenmcdonaldrivet.com ↗ (opens kristenmcdonaldrivet.com at this heading)
Kristen doesn’t play political games and works with anyone, regardless of party, to solve the problems facing Mid-Michigan. In her first year, she introduced 19 bills, all of which have a Republican partner, and two of her bills were signed into law by President Trump.
When her own party pushed an EV mandate that would kill Michigan auto jobs, she fought back and helped stop it. She consistently works with both parties to lower costs, strengthen our border, and support local law enforcement, and that’s why she is rated the most bipartisan member of Congress from Michigan.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · kristenmcdonaldrivet.com/priority/working-with-both-parties-to-get-stuff-done
Heading as listed on kristenmcdonaldrivet.com ↗ (opens kristenmcdonaldrivet.com at this heading)
92% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 52 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Agriculture
House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Rivet’s 19 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00864207
62¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($4.3M of $6.9M). Cash on hand went from $622.2K on Mar 31, 2025 to $2.7M on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $750,165 | $144,963 | $622,232 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $800,249 | $157,742 | $1,264,739 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $860,096 | $168,248 | $1,956,588 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $894,610 | $220,965 | $2,630,232 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $1,079,852 | $275,018 | $3,435,067 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $1,155,202 | $376,293 | $4,213,977 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 15, 2026 | $104,701 | $64,579 | $4,254,099 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $1,175,670 | $2,220,360 | $3,209,409 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $102,333 | $636,873 | $2,674,869 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Not read yet
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 4,805 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $3.2M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 1,036 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.8M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 10 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 31 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $434.1K.
Total reported receipts $6,922,879
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
32% of the money placed by state came from inside Michigan: $1M of $3.2M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2,420 contributions · 32% | $1,026,000 |
| 451 contributions · 14% | $462,769 |
| 313 contributions · 14% | $444,938 |
| 350 contributions · 9.5% | $307,651 |
| 235 contributions · 4.6% | $148,453 |
| 110 contributions · 3.5% | $113,648 |
| 162 contributions · 3.1% | $98,901 |
| 78 contributions · 1.8% | $59,602 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 46 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 2,968 contributions · 52% of ranked | $1,461,397 |
| Written instead of an employer · 294 contributions · 8.7% of ranked | $244,200 |
| 23 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $18,010 |
| 9 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $18,000 |
| 11 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $17,155 |
| 7 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $17,000 |
| 13 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $16,562 |
| 8 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $15,100 |
A further $31,429 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($482,892) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $56,931 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $1,987,678
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,149 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
69 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $284,846 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 13% of all spending | $533,306 |
| 113 payments · 9% of all spending | $384,861 |
| 62 payments · 5.1% of all spending | $215,511 |
| 55 payments · 4% of all spending | $169,904 |
| 114 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $98,641 |
| 12 payments · 1.5% of all spending | $64,600 |
| 3 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $61,185 |
| 21 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $59,449 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 2,417 contributions · 34% of ranked | $1,056,634 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 541 contributions · 12% of ranked | $386,013 |
| 144 contributions · 4% of ranked | $125,436 |
| 132 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $111,063 |
| 43 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $73,725 |
| 61 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $71,850 |
| 27 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $70,178 |
| 45 contributions · 2% of ranked | $62,395 |
A further $31,429 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($482,892) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.