Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00744920 · files monthly
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
“The Campaign for a Family Friendly Economy PAC wins elections by talking to voters in battleground states around the country about where candidates stand on policies that lower costs, especially the cost of caregiving.”
Cffe PAC, on its own site, familyfriendlyeconomy.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
6 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Parents should be able to go to work secure in the knowledge that their children are well cared for, without breaking the bank.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · familyfriendlyeconomy.org
Heading as listed on familyfriendlyeconomy.org ↗ (opens familyfriendlyeconomy.org at this heading)
Seniors and people with disabilities should have access to affordable care that enables them to live full, independent lives.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · familyfriendlyeconomy.org
Heading as listed on familyfriendlyeconomy.org ↗ (opens familyfriendlyeconomy.org at this heading)
We should all be able to take paid time away from work to care for a new baby, an ill loved one or our own serious health condition.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · familyfriendlyeconomy.org
Heading as listed on familyfriendlyeconomy.org ↗ (opens familyfriendlyeconomy.org at this heading)
We should all be able to afford the health care and prescription drugs we need to live healthy, fulfilling lives.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · familyfriendlyeconomy.org
Heading as listed on familyfriendlyeconomy.org ↗ (opens familyfriendlyeconomy.org at this heading)
The Campaign for a Family Friendly Economy runs surround sound campaigns that educate people about the votes their members of Congress are taking that drive up prices.
Our goal is to empower constituents to demand elected officials support policies to lower everyday costs, including the cost of caregiving.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · familyfriendlyeconomy.org
The Campaign for a Family Friendly Economy runs surround sound campaigns that educate people about the votes their members of Congress are taking that drive up prices, especially the cost of caregiving, and empower constituents to demand elected officials support policies to lower everyday costs.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · familyfriendlyeconomy.org/accountability
Heading as listed on familyfriendlyeconomy.org ↗ (opens familyfriendlyeconomy.org at this heading)
Heading as listed on familyfriendlyeconomy.org ↗ (opens familyfriendlyeconomy.org at this heading)
The Campaign for a Family Friendly Economy is fighting for a future where all people can afford to care for themselves and their loved ones.
We build the political power to pass policies that lower costs for families, like paid family and medical leave and quality, affordable child care, elder care and health care.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · familyfriendlyeconomy.org
Heading as listed on familyfriendlyeconomy.org ↗ (opens familyfriendlyeconomy.org at this heading)
The Campaign for a Family Friendly Economy builds the political power to pass policies that lower costs for families, like paid family and medical leave and quality, affordable child care, elder care and health care.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · familyfriendlyeconomy.org
Heading as listed on familyfriendlyeconomy.org ↗ (opens familyfriendlyeconomy.org at this heading)
Affordable Pennsylvania is fighting to persuade U.S. Representatives Ryan Mackenzie, Rob Bresnahan and Scott Perry, each of whom promised to stand with working families and lower costs, to fulfill their promises and support legislation to improve the lives of families.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · familyfriendlyeconomy.org/accountability
Affordable Virginia is fighting to convince U.S. Representative Jen Kiggans to stop putting corporations ahead of families in Virginia and instead support policies that would lower costs for her constituents.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · familyfriendlyeconomy.org/accountability
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 12 | $52.5K · 73% |
| Other PACs and committees | 2 | $19K · 27% |
| All recipients | 14 | $71.5K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Iowa | 3 | $15K |
| Virginia | 2 | $10K |
| Pennsylvania | 2 | $10K |
| Michigan | 1 | $5K |
| Ohio | 1 | $5K |
| Texas | 1 | $2.5K |
| Colorado | 1 | $2.5K |
| California | 1 | $2.5K |
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $14K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to DEM RISING 2026 · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to HINES VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $24.5M from 20 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $24,643,883
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 11 contributions · 23% | $28,100 |
| 22 contributions · 21% | $25,706 |
| 9 contributions · 18% | $22,333 |
| 6 contributions · 8.5% | $10,500 |
| 3 contributions · 8.3% | $10,250 |
| 2 contributions · 8.1% | $10,000 |
| 3 contributions · 5.7% | $7,000 |
Total reported disbursements $14,853,414
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $8,531,381 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$14.9M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $9.6M, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending. The line stops at the latest report, through Oct 14, 2026, at the dashed rule; elections after it are marked where they fall.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Cffe PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (qualified). Its FEC record names Caregivers House Victory Fund as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Cffe PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $14K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
| House campaign committee · 1 payment |
| $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NEW POLITICS NEXT MISSION FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to STELSON VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NEW POLITICS NEXT MISSION FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to IMPOSSIBLE TO INEVITABLE · 1 payment | $2.5K |
$71.5K across 14 recipient committees, or 0.5% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $5,000 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 contributions · 22% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 5 contributions · 20% of ranked | $9,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 7 contributions · 14% of ranked | $6,500 |
| 1 contribution · 11% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 11% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 11% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $1,333 |
| 1 contribution · 2.2% of ranked | $1,000 |
A further $77,389 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,156) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 36 contributions · 63% of ranked | $77,389 |
| 2 contributions · 8.1% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 4 contributions · 8% of ranked | $9,833 |
| 5 contributions · 7.3% of ranked | $9,000 |
| 1 contribution · 4.1% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 4.1% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $1,500 |
| 1 contribution · 0.8% of ranked | $1,000 |
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,156) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $126,751
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 77 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 6 payments · 0.2% of all spending | $28,410 |
| 1 payment · <0.1% of all spending | $14,000 |
| 1 payment · <0.1% of all spending | $12,500 |
| 4 payments · <0.1% of all spending | $7,211 |
| 1 payment · <0.1% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 1 payment · <0.1% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 1 payment · <0.1% of all spending | $5,000 |
| 1 payment · <0.1% of all spending | $5,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.