Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › PA-08 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, PA-08
Has not served in Congress
5 priorities from paigeforpa.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Paige Cognetti is a reformer who’s proven she will challenge the system, root out waste, fraud, and abuse, and deliver results for the people of Northeastern Pennsylvania. This policy agenda is just step one.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · paigeforpa.com/anti-corruption-agenda
Corrupt politicians in both parties have been taking advantage of their constituents’ trust for too long and Congressman Rob Bresnahan is only the newest offender. Members of Congress consistently trade stocks in companies that directly intersect with their work on congressional committees. They sit in classified briefings, hear economic forecasts before the public does, and vote on legislation that can make or break entire industries. This is the definition of public corruption. I don’t own any individual stocks, and if elected, I won’t buy or trade them, period. I will fight to pass a ban on members of Congress trading stocks so that the people of Northeastern Pennsylvania and Americans everywhere don’t have to wonder if their representative is working to serve their community, or to enrich themselves.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · paigeforpa.com/anti-corruption-agenda
Big corporations have too much influence on our politics. They buy our elected leaders, shape our policy, and use our federal government as a tool to protect their interests and push the priorities of working families to the sidelines. Congressman Bresnahan, has taken over $267,000 from these corporate PACs. As a candidate for Congress, I don’t take a dime from corporate PACs. As a member of Congress, I will propose legislation to ban corporate PAC donations to federal campaigns. The meetings our Representatives take and the priorities they fight for should be dictated by what is best for their districts, not a corporate lobbyist coming with a check.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · paigeforpa.com/anti-corruption-agenda
Just last year, we had the longest government shutdown in history, lasting 43 days. Hundreds of thousands of federal workers went without paychecks and veterans’ services were delayed. Yet through it all, Congress members continued to collect their salaries without interruption. No ordinary American gets paid when they fail to do their job, and neither should Congress. I will fight to pass a No Budget, No Pay bill to withhold members’ pay until a budget is passed, ensuring that members of Congress feel the consequences of their failures like everyone else does. Northeastern Pennsylvanians work hard and punch the clock to earn their paychecks. Washington shouldn’t be any different.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · paigeforpa.com/anti-corruption-agenda
Our elected officials are supposed to work for the people they were elected to serve. But too many Washington politicians have forgotten who they work for. There are members of Congress who have gotten too comfortable and have stayed too long. I will fight to pass a constitutional amendment establishing term limits: 18 years for members of the House of Representatives, 18 years for Senators. We should also apply the 18 year standard to Supreme Court justices so that the structure no longer incentivizes Justices to serve well past their ability to do so and the Court ceases to become a place of constant gamesmanship.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · paigeforpa.com/anti-corruption-agenda
The federal government spends trillions of our tax dollars every year. The American people are owed a full accounting of every dollar spent in their name. It’s the bare minimum needed to restore trust in our federal government. In Congress, I will fight for a comprehensive, mandatory, independent audit of every federal agency. In Scranton, we made tough decisions with a red pen to turn our city’s finances around. We balanced the budget for the first time in decades and brought our city back from junk bond status to A- credit rating. We need more fiscal responsibility in Washington, and I’ll bring my red pen with me to Congress. A person that can’t account for their spending gets their credit card cut off. Congress should face the same consequences. The federal government audits agencies year after year, but there aren’t meaningful enforcement mechanisms to address findings. I will fight to make sure agencies that fail their audits are legally required to address every finding before Congress approves their next budget.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · paigeforpa.com/anti-corruption-agenda
Under current law, former members of Congress must wait just one year before lobbying their former colleagues; Senators must wait two. After that, there are virtually no restrictions. Corporations pay a premium for former members of Congress precisely because of their access to and relationships with their former colleagues. After being elected to serve their constituents, these members cash in, further stacking the deck against regular Americans in corporations’ favor. Enough is enough. I will push to permanently ban members of Congress from becoming lobbyists.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · paigeforpa.com/anti-corruption-agenda
Current rules technically bar members from being paid for this service, but sitting on a board builds the relationships, loyalties, and goodwill that translate into a lucrative payday the moment they leave office. Former members who land corporate board seats average over $350,000 a year, twice their congressional salary. In Congress, I will fight to pass legislation banning members from serving on corporate boards while in office. Congressional members are elected to serve the people. You cannot do that job while answering to a corporate boardroom.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · paigeforpa.com/anti-corruption-agenda
Prediction markets have exploded in the past year, offering the wealthy and well-connected a chance to cash in on their insider knowledge of elections, acts of war, and government decisions. As the war in Iran sent financial markets into chaos, insiders were making millions on prediction markets, placing suspiciously-timed bets on military strikes before they happened. Ordinary Americans were watching their retirement accounts take a hit while the well-connected cashed in. It needs to be banned for Members of Congress and their staff.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · paigeforpa.com/anti-corruption-agenda
- A Ban on Congressional Stock Trading. No one should be able to use their public office to enrich themselves.
- No Corporate PAC Money. As a candidate and member of Congress I will reject the influence of special interests.
- Audit the Federal Government. I’ve been cutting waste, fraud, and abuse in government for nearly a decade, but we need to do it with a scalpel, not a chainsaw.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · paigeforpa.com/priorities
Heading as listed on paigeforpa.com/priorities ↗ (opens paigeforpa.com/priorities at this heading)
- Break up the huge monopolies that hurt our small businesses and raise costs. Bring more competition into our communities by ending the Big Box monopolies that drive small businesses out of our area, give consumers fewer options, and let a few large companies control everything.
- Strengthen unions; make it easier to join and start a union.
- Respect the power of the people via local control and allocate more federal money directly to municipalities and counties.
- Champion small business by understanding how federal choices impact their ability to stay alive — without access to a healthcare marketplace, many people cannot work at the small businesses they love.
- Go after fees that shrink our pocketbooks with a million little cuts, like capping credit card swipe fees.
- Prevent healthcare industry middlemen from denying care and medications prescribed by doctors.
- Reform the insurance system so that when people pay for insurance, they can expect to be protected when something happens – from healthcare to flooding.
- Fight for paid family leave and affordable childcare.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · paigeforpa.com/priorities
Heading as listed on paigeforpa.com/priorities ↗ (opens paigeforpa.com/priorities at this heading)
- Reshore manufacturing jobs, including continuing to add more defense manufacturing in Northeastern Pennsylvania.
- Cut red tape, make permitting make sense, allow more businesses to start, grow and thrive. Move faster on infrastructure projects we need for our economic future, from safe streets to bridges to passenger rail.
- Stop broad tariffs that help the big guys and hurt families, create smart targeted tariffs to protect manufacturing here.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · paigeforpa.com/priorities
Heading as listed on paigeforpa.com/priorities ↗ (opens paigeforpa.com/priorities at this heading)
Northeastern Pennsylvanians built this country. The coal and shale under our feet have fueled the nation and powered advancement for generations. We know well the promise of innovation and investment that comes with new technology. But we also know better what it looks like when outside corporations steamroll through our cities and towns, take over our land, extract every bit of profit from our people and our resources, and then leave us high and dry. For generations, these companies have made big promises, let us down, and left us to pick up the pieces.
Now it’s data centers.
I’ve spent a lot of time listening to data center developers trying to explain why they should build here. In the rooms I’ve been in and in the projects I’ve seen, there is no project anywhere in NEPA that should move forward.
I won’t let corporate special interests and speculative developers take advantage of our community yet again. If developers want to build in NEPA, they need to follow our rules. This is our home and we’re not for sale.
- Stay away from homes, schools and public parks. No sites in a small town, on top of a school district, or in a beloved state park. Construction must happen on brownfields and sites that can’t be developed for residential use.
- Total transparency – no hiding behind NDAs. If these companies can’t be honest about who they are and why they’re here, they shouldn’t even be here at all.
- No tax breaks for wealthy corporations. At a time when hardworking Pennsylvanians are struggling to pay their bills and fill up their gas tanks, the last people who need more money in their pockets are big companies and their billionaire executives.
- Pay their own way and supply their own energy resources. Produce your own energy, don’t poison our water, and don’t jack up utility costs for local businesses and residents.
- Built with local union labor. These jobs must go to local union workers and benefit our community.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · paigeforpa.com/priorities
Heading as listed on paigeforpa.com/priorities ↗ (opens paigeforpa.com/priorities at this heading)
FEC filings, Sep 2, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00918151
97¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 7 reports ($7.3M of $7.5M). Cash on hand went from $443K on Sep 30, 2025 to $243.7K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $500,259 | $57,292 | $442,967 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $646,848 | $283,137 | $806,678 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $1,460,608 | $342,427 | $1,924,859 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Apr 29, 2026 | $494,705 | $169,387 | $2,250,177 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $1,507,168 | $350,636 | $3,406,710 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $2,486,095 | $4,942,462 | $950,343 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $406,675 | $1,113,346 | $243,672 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
20 endorsers listed on Paige Cognetti’s own campaign site: 1 official, 17 unions, 2 organizations.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
“Northeastern Pennsylvania ironworkers know what hard work looks like, and they trust Paige will work just as hard as they do in Congress,” said Chris Hoover, Ironworkers Local 404 Business Manager. “That’s why Local 404 is proud to endorse Paige’s campaign for Congress, because we know she will fight for working people in Washington just like she’s always done as mayor. We look forward to working alongside Paige to pass legislation that protects and expands the right to unionize, increases worker pay, and ensures our economy works for regular people rather than big corporations.”
Pennsylvania Association of Staff Nurses and Allied Professionals
“With healthcare costs rising and threats to Medicaid escalating, the stakes for patients, hospitals, and healthcare workers across Northeastern Pennsylvania couldn’t be higher. Frontline healthcare workers at Geisinger Community Medical Center and Wilkes-Barre General Hospital see every day how critical it is to protect access to care and invest in safe, quality healthcare,” said Maureen May, RN, PASNAP President. “Paige Cognetti understands what’s at stake. She’s been a strong partner in the fight for safe staffing, workplace violence protections, and ensuring frontline caregivers have a voice in the decisions that impact their patients and their professions. At a time when too many politicians have broken promises on protecting Medicaid, we need leadership we can trust. That’s why PASNAP is proud to endorse Paige Cognetti for Congress in Pennsylvania’s 8th District. We know she will stand with working people and be a champion for the communities we serve.”
Pennsylvania State Education Association
“I spent three decades teaching middle school kids in Northeastern Pennsylvania, and I understand how critical it is to elect leaders like Paige Cognetti, who will be a true champion for Pennsylvania’s public schools,” said PSEA President Aaron Chapin. “As mayor of Scranton and a former school board member, Paige has worked to help students succeed and to ensure educators and support professionals are respected and treated fairly. In Congress, she will stand up for our public schools, strengthen workers’ rights and unions, and work to improve the quality of life for families across Pennsylvania.”
Communications Workers of America
“Paige’s commitment to empowering workers, her support for strengthening labor rights, and her solidarity with working families over billionaires and big business has earned her our support in this race. As mayor of Scranton, she’s invested in NEPA workers and we trust she will do the same in Congress,” said Mike Davis, International Vice President CWA District 2-13. “At a time when politicians are prioritizing personal profit, their wealthy donors, and corporate stooges, Paige is the pro-worker, pro-labor leader that we need in Washington.”
Greater Wilkes-Barre Labor Council
“We are proud to endorse Paige Cognetti for Congress. We need an honest person down in Washington fighting for our workers. Someone who can hear both sides of an issue and doesn’t shy away from a challenge. Paige is that candidate,” said Joe Padavan, President of the Greater Wilkes-Barre Labor Council. “Paige has led with integrity in Scranton and we believe she’ll do a great job in Congress continuing the fight for NEPA workers. We are behind her, one hundred percent.”
Advanced · 58,374 votes (100%) · 1 of 1 · Full results ↗
Won · 151,418 votes (53%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Latest poll · The New York Times/Siena University, Oct 22, 2026 · too few nonpartisan polls for a lead
A poll is a snapshot, not a forecast.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 4,131 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $3.3M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 290 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $630.1K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 9 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 22 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $354.2K.
Total reported receipts $7,502,359
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
23% of the money placed by state came from inside Pennsylvania: $749K of $3.3M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,295 contributions · 23% | $749,019 |
| 704 contributions · 22% | $712,150 |
| 380 contributions · 14% | $442,581 |
| 441 contributions · 10% | $326,571 |
| 167 contributions · 3.9% | $126,541 |
| 169 contributions · 3.5% | $114,476 |
| 83 contributions · 2.6% | $84,315 |
| 99 contributions · 2.3% | $74,799 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 51 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 2,386 contributions · 62% of ranked | $1,785,526 |
| Written instead of an employer · 379 contributions · 12% of ranked | $336,762 |
| 4 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 4 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 4 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 3 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 7 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $10,300 |
| 9 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $9,675 |
A further $26,054 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,103,538) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $79,702 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $2,280,340
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 833 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
40 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $237,214 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 9 payments · 8.9% of all spending | $645,804 |
| 71 payments · 4.7% of all spending | $344,711 |
| 3 payments · 3.7% of all spending | $267,325 |
| 14 payments · 2.1% of all spending | $155,000 |
| 4 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $114,650 |
| 62 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $92,128 |
| 11 payments · 1% of all spending | $70,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.9% of all spending | $67,659 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 2,038 contributions · 49% of ranked | $1,531,185 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 343 contributions · 8.1% of ranked | $254,534 |
| 240 contributions · 6.2% of ranked | $195,011 |
| 120 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $80,902 |
| 56 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $49,629 |
| 32 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $41,593 |
| 23 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $40,830 |
| 40 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $38,104 |
A further $26,054 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,103,538) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.