Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
Hybrid PAC (qualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
WelcomePAC is a political action committee that recruits and supports candidates affiliated with the centrist Blue Dog Coalition of the United States Democratic Party. The group launched during the 2022 midterm election cycle and has been described by the New York Times as a "Democratic-aligned outfit that applies insurgent tactics to support center-left candidates in swing districts". The organization's co-founder has articulated its aim to "become the Justice Democrats of the political center". The organization is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a hybrid PAC and raised more than $2 million in its inaugural cycle to support Democrats and oppose Republicans in Ohio and California. According to the magazine New York, WelcomePAC is funded by billionaires Reid Hoffman, Michael Bloomberg, James Murdoch and his wife Kathryn, Rory Gates, the Walton family, and Joe Manchin and Heather Manchin's centrist Americans Together organization. (Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00786830 · files monthly
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
“WelcomePAC: WelcomePAC is a federally authorized hybrid Political Action Committee. WelcomePAC’s work is electoral – identifying and backing bold pragmatic Democrats running for Federal office. WelcomePAC expands the Democratic tent to put more House districts in play. First started in 2021, our electoral work began with the support of Centrist Democratic candidates running for House seats in California and Colorado in 2022.”
Welcomepac, on its own site, welcome.team
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
5 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Politics is dominated by the extremes.
America does not lack pragmatic, unifying leaders.
But the extremes are organized, funded by billions from ideologues, and amplified by the influencers and PACs who profit off of polarization.
Welcome to a new kind of old school politics: one that turns the volume up on the voices getting stuff done in D.C. and addresses the everyday concerns of voters.
We started in 2019, knocking on doors of independent voters in South Carolina and New Hampshire.
The New York Times called us a “centrist Insurgency”.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · welcome.team
Heading as listed on welcome.team ↗ (opens welcome.team at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 27 | $145K · 97% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 1 | $5K · 3.3% |
| All recipients | 28 | $150K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Texas | 4 | $20K |
| Iowa | 4 | $20K |
| Pennsylvania | 4 | $20K |
| Florida | 4 | $20K |
| Washington | 1 | $10K |
| Michigan | 1 | $10K |
| North Carolina | 2 | $10K |
| Wisconsin | 2 | $10K |
The largest 8 of 13 states.
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $1.3M from 11 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
The largest of the committees is listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $4,499,075
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 44 contributions · 33% | $981,750 |
| 130 contributions · 28% | $820,525 |
| 91 contributions · 18% | $523,564 |
| 20 contributions · 12% | $365,966 |
| 34 contributions · 3.4% |
Total reported disbursements $4,338,025
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $1,107,941 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$4.3M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $594.3K, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending. The line stops at the latest report, through Oct 14, 2026, at the dashed rule; elections after it are marked where they fall.
No lobbying disclosures matched
WelcomePAC is a political action committee that recruits and supports candidates affiliated with the centrist Blue Dog Coalition of the United States Democratic Party. The group launched during the 2022 midterm election cycle and has been described by the New York Times as a "Democratic-aligned outfit that applies insurgent tactics to support center-left candidates in swing districts". The organization's co-founder has articulated its aim to "become the Justice Democrats of the political center". The organization is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a hybrid PAC and raised more than $2 million in its inaugural cycle to support Democrats and oppose Republicans in Ohio and California. According to the magazine New York, WelcomePAC is funded by billionaires Reid Hoffman, Michael Bloomberg, James Murdoch and his wife Kathryn, Rory Gates, the Walton family, and Joe Manchin and Heather Manchin's centrist Americans Together organization. Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Welcomepac is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $10K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $1K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND DEMOCRACY NOW PAC · 2 payments | $1K |
$17K from 4 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| House campaign committee · Connected to MAJORITY MAKERS VICTORY FUND · 3 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to IMPOSSIBLE TO INEVITABLE · 3 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 3 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to STELSON VICTORY FUND · 3 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to DEMOCRATIC FUTURE LEADERSHIP FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BLUE DOG VICTORY FUND · 3 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NEW POLITICS NEXT MISSION FUND · 3 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 3 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BALE DALTON VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to DANDIYA FLORIDA VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to VICENTE GONZALEZ VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
$150K across 19 recipient committees, or 3.5% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $99,083 |
| 25 contributions · 2.2% | $65,050 |
| 37 contributions · 1% | $31,000 |
| 3 contributions · 0.9% | $25,525 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 contribution · 19% of ranked | $500,000 |
| 56 contributions · 19% of ranked | $482,500 |
| 12 contributions · 13% of ranked | $328,000 |
| 52 contributions · 12% of ranked | $311,500 |
| 2 contributions · 11% of ranked | $290,000 |
| 5 contributions · 5.3% of ranked | $135,000 |
| 22 contributions · 4.7% of ranked | $120,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 29 contributions · 4.3% of ranked | $109,916 |
A further $385,477 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($42,059) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 87 contributions · 25% of ranked | $742,000 |
| 1 contribution · 17% of ranked | $500,000 |
| 12 contributions · 11% of ranked | $328,000 |
| 52 contributions · 11% of ranked | $311,500 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 156 contributions · 9.9% of ranked | $292,477 |
| 2 contributions · 9.8% of ranked | $290,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $105,000 |
| 21 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $100,000 |
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($42,059) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $232,739
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 203 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 0.4% of all spending | $16,000 |
| 4 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $14,015 |
| 10 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $13,199 |
| 3 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $12,380 |
| 13 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $12,019 |
| 3 payments · 0.2% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 3 payments · 0.2% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 3 payments · 0.2% of all spending | $10,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.