Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › CA-22 race › 2025–2026
DemocraticU.S. House, CA-22California
Has not served in Congress
3 priorities from drjasmeetbains.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Everyday costs in the Central Valley are squeezing too many families. Dr. Bains will fight to lower the price of essentials — from gas, rent, and utilities to groceries, childcare, and health care — and to make sure paychecks stretch further. She supports commonsense policies to curb inflation and eliminate reckless tariffs that hurt Valley farmers and raise prices on working families.
Dr. Bains believes hard work should be rewarded with fair pay. She’ll take on Washington politicians who hand tax to billionaires and big corporations while Valley families are left paying the price.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · drjasmeetbains.com/issues/affordability
The Central Valley has fueled California’s economy for generations, but too often, gets left behind. Dr. Bains will fight to protect the jobs we have and create high-quality jobs right here at home by investing in agriculture, and infrastructure — projects that put people to work today while building the foundation for long-term economic growth.
She supports passing the PRO Act to strengthen workers’ rights and ensure every worker has a voice on the job. Dr. Bains will push for a just transition that protects energy workers as our economy adapts to clean energy, so no worker is left behind. And she’ll champion public investment in rural and underserved areas — from roads and water systems to broadband — to attract new industries and good-paying union jobs for the next generation.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · drjasmeetbains.com/issues/economic-opportunity-and-jobs
Dr. Jasmeet Bains has seen firsthand how Washington decisions affect families’ health and make the difference between being able to afford a prescription or putting food on the table.
In Congress, she’ll fight to protect Medicare and Medicaid from devastating cuts, expand access to quality, affordable health care, and ensure seniors, working families, and rural Californians can count on the care they deserve. She’ll take on special interests and the drug companies to lower the cost of prescription medications, so no patient has to choose between paying for their medicine or their mortgage. In the Assembly, she led the fight to lower and cap insulin prices.
As a practicing family physician and Chief Medical Officer for the Central Valley, Dr. Bains knows our region suffers from some of the worst health outcomes and one of the most severe provider shortages in the nation. Just like when she led the effort to build a UC medical school in Kern County, Dr. Bains will work to expand rural health access and incentives for doctors, nurses, and other health professionals to serve in underserved areas — ensuring every community, no matter its ZIP code, has access to quality and affordable care.
From serving patients in her clinic, to standing up surge hospitals on the frontlines of COVID-19, and deploying to California’s wildfires to operate field hospitals and provide emergency care to evacuees and firefighters – there is nothing more important to Dr. Bains than fighting for her community’s care. She will bring that same resolve to Washington.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · drjasmeetbains.com/issues/health-care
FEC filings, Jul 1, 2025 to Sep 30, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00912147
97¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 6 reports ($1.5M of $1.6M). Cash on hand went from $237.3K on Sep 30, 2025 to $44.4K on Sep 30, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $350,151 | $112,879 | $237,271 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $299,671 | $99,411 | $437,531 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $461,703 | $198,702 | $700,532 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026 | $191,216 | $531,963 | $359,785 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $276,042 | $550,398 | $85,428 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $1,579 | $42,651 | $44,356 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
24 endorsers listed on Jasmeet Bains’ own campaign site: 14 unions, 10 organizations.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Not yet called · 100% reporting · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,537 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.2M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 84 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $232.5K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The largest of the sources is listed. In all, 3 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $18.4K.
Total reported receipts $1,580,360
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
63% of the money placed by state came from inside California: $772.9K of $1.2M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,088 contributions · 63% | $772,908 |
| 65 contributions · 8.4% | $102,747 |
| 49 contributions · 4.8% | $58,237 |
| 45 contributions · 4.7% | $57,066 |
| 29 contributions · 3.1% | $38,479 |
| 24 contributions · 3.1% | $38,078 |
| 12 contributions · 2.1% | $25,484 |
| 10 contributions · 1.7% | $20,616 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 35 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 740 contributions · 39% of ranked | $389,335 |
| Written instead of an employer · 204 contributions · 12% of ranked | $116,347 |
| 5 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 4 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 5 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $11,388 |
| 5 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $9,250 |
| 5 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $9,150 |
| 3 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $8,000 |
A further $177,621 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($170,293) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $205,418 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $1,311,460
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 585 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
38 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $114,259 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 10 payments · 16% of all spending | $245,973 |
| 8 payments · 15% of all spending | $227,250 |
| 4 payments · 9.7% of all spending | $148,505 |
| 28 payments · 6.8% of all spending | $104,895 |
| 41 payments · 4.7% of all spending | $71,821 |
| 13 payments · 4.1% of all spending | $63,089 |
| 6 payments · 4% of all spending | $61,659 |
| 4 payments · 3.2% of all spending | $49,098 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 641 contributions · 32% of ranked | $337,543 |
| 104 contributions · 7.5% of ranked | $78,105 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 83 contributions · 4.6% of ranked | $48,130 |
| 33 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $30,710 |
| 103 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $28,204 |
| 13 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $18,550 |
| 25 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $18,019 |
| 6 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $17,750 |
A further $176,621 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($170,293) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.