Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
Hybrid PAC (qualified)Brooklyn, New YorkActive
Working Families Party hybrid PAC (Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00606962 · files monthly
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
“We organize on top of and around the two party system to advocate for consumers, counter corporate power, and elect champions for working families.
We don't do protest votes or spoiler campaigns — we build real governing power:”
Working Families Party PAC, on its own site, caworkingfamilies.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
4 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
California has one of the largest economies in the world, built on the backs of working families.
Every day, Californians are dealing with rising costs and corporations that put profits ahead of the people they’re supposed to serve.
Too often, politicians take money from those same industries and look the other way while families get squeezed.
It doesn’t have to be that way.
That's what we fight for at the Working Families Party.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · caworkingfamilies.org
Heading as listed on caworkingfamilies.org ↗ (opens caworkingfamilies.org at this heading)
Together, we can create a California where everyone can thrive.
We believe most of us want the same things.
We want to earn enough to thrive, not just survive, and leave a better future for our kids.
We want healthy food and clean water, safe neighborhoods and a safe world.
But the richest people on Earth — and the political insiders that serve them — have rigged the rules of our economy and democracy to grab up wealth and power for themselves.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · caworkingfamilies.org/about
We organize on top of and around the two party system to advocate for consumers, counter corporate power, and elect champions for working families.
We don't do protest votes or spoiler campaigns — we build real governing power:
• Identify, recruit, and support progressive candidates to offices at every level, from school boards to U.S. Congress (more than 100 so far!)
• Organize California's communities and consumers.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · caworkingfamilies.org/about
A voice for consumers over corporations, workers over bosses, and people over profit.
CA WFP represents a coalition of more than 30 grassroots organizations and labor unions, with nearly 100,000 members across every region of California.
And that's who we're accountable to — everyday consumers and community members, not corporations or billionaires.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · caworkingfamilies.org/about
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 29 | $70,824 | $4,039,486 | $4,110,310 | 79% |
| Other or unresolved | 12 | $0 | $1,073,193 | $1,073,193 | 21% |
| Shown support | 41 | $70,824 | $5,112,679 | $5,183,503 | 100% |
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 16 | $85.8K · 74% |
| Other PACs and committees | 2 | $30K · 26% |
| All recipients | 18 | $115.8K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Michigan | 3 | $20K |
| California | 4 | $19.8K |
| Pennsylvania | 3 | $15K |
| New Jersey | 1 | $10K |
| Colorado | 1 | $5K |
| New York | 1 | $5K |
| North Carolina | 1 | $5K |
| Illinois | 1 | $5K |
The largest 8 of 9 states.
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $19M from 129 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $26,805,961
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,229 contributions · 42% | $2,225,810 |
| 830 contributions · 20% | $1,067,459 |
| 504 contributions · 10% |
Total reported disbursements $21,371,087
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $6,081,842 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$21.4M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $2.8M, June 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
2022 cycleReport released Mar 5, 2025
Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Working Families Party hybrid PAC Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Working Families Party PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $25K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to DEMOCRACY PAC II · 4 payments | $6.5M |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $300K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL UNION OF HEALTHCARE WORKERS · 5 payments | $115K |
| Senate campaign committee · 4 payments | $115K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $80K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $80K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to INT'L UNION UNITED AUTOMOBILE AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA UAW · 3 payments | $75K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 2 payments | $75K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 5 payments | $63K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $50K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to THE EMPOWERMENT FUND · 1 payment | $50K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to CALIFORNIA NURSES ASSOCIATION · 2 payments | $48K |
$8M from 37 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $25K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to WILLIAM LAWRENCE VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BOB BROOKS VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to EFFIE AND MAI'S FUNDRAISING COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to CALIFORNIA HOUSE MAJORITY FUND · 2 payments | $9.8K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to BATTLEGROUND BLUE PAC · 1 payment |
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $544,471 |
| 152 contributions · 8.7% | $458,861 |
| 126 contributions · 5.5% | $291,594 |
| 121 contributions · 3.1% | $162,273 |
| 269 contributions · 1.3% | $70,764 |
| 174 contributions · 1.2% | $63,178 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 648 contributions · 39% of ranked | $1,969,985 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1,555 contributions · 28% of ranked | $1,416,553 |
| 1 contribution · 3.9% of ranked | $200,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.7% of ranked | $190,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 37 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $177,455 |
| 2 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $175,000 |
| 3 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $85,695 |
| 2 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $74,100 |
A further $88,866 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,355,663) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,545 contributions · 27% of ranked | $1,406,214 |
| 1 contribution · 7.5% of ranked | $389,733 |
| 8 contributions · 7.3% of ranked | $377,500 |
| 131 contributions · 5.7% of ranked | $292,664 |
| 57 contributions · 4.6% of ranked | $236,045 |
| 1 contribution · 4.4% of ranked | $225,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.9% of ranked | $200,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 87 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $197,558 |
A further $82,010 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,355,663) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $4,494,392
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 270 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 26 payments · 18% of all spending | $3,944,260 |
| 23 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $233,393 |
| 57 payments · 0.4% of all spending | $75,874 |
| 1 payment · 0.1% of all spending | $25,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.1% of all spending | $23,349 |
| 1 payment · 0.1% of all spending | $22,500 |
| 1 payment · <0.1% of all spending | $21,000 |
| 105 payments · <0.1% of all spending | $19,209 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to ABDUL FOR MICHIGAN VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
$115.8K across 18 recipient committees, or 0.5% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown. A further $9.8K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.