Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00945303 · files monthly
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
“SF for All proudly endorses Supervisor Connie Chan for Congress. As Budget Chair, she is a proven leader who has fought for our issues time and again. We support her because Connie delivers on affordability!”
SF for All, on its own site, sfforall.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
3 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
To shake up Washington, Connie will champion real oversight, block reckless spending, work to stop ICE raids from threatening our communities, and introduce innovative legislation on behalf of working people.
She will stand tall as an uncompromising firewall against the Trump administration’s overreach.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sfforall.com
Heading as listed on sfforall.com ↗ (opens sfforall.com at this heading)
Connie Chan will invest in manufacturing and construction to build up the working class, and she has a set of bold reforms to empower everyday workers.
From mandating pay equity and phased-in transparency to protecting household staff and protecting worker classification and DEI initiatives, we can count on Connie to be a worker-first voice in Washington.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sfforall.com
Heading as listed on sfforall.com ↗ (opens sfforall.com at this heading)
Let's send Connie to Congress to slash our monthly bills!
We are impressed that Connie will prioritize building affordable, high-quality workforce housing, crushing rising health premiums, and lowering energy costs for everyone by rapidly expanding our clean, green infrastructure.
This is the kind of agenda that can make living more affordable.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · sfforall.com
Heading as listed on sfforall.com ↗ (opens sfforall.com at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other or unresolved | 1 | $0 | $683,221 | $683,221 | 60% |
| Democratic | 2 | $0 | $457,668 | $457,668 | 40% |
| Shown support | 3 | $0 | $1,140,889 | $1,140,889 | 100% |
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Other PACs and committees | 1 | $6K · 100% |
| All recipients | 1 | $6K |
No recipient here is matched to a candidate with a state on record.
Bars drawn to $6K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to NATIONAL NURSES UNITED · 1 payment | $100K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to PLUMBERS & STEAMFITTERS LOCAL 22 PAC INC · 1 payment | $100K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to PELOSI · 1 payment | $100K |
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 3 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $103K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 10 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $2,379,845
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3 contributions · 100% | $103,000 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 contribution · 97% of ranked | $100,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.4% of ranked | $2,500 |
| 1 contribution · 0.5% of ranked | $500 |
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Total reported disbursements $1,735,301
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $967,234 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$1.7M spent from Jan 2026 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $482.7K, May 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending.
No lobbying disclosures matched
SF for All is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Super PAC (independent expenditure-only). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
SF for All is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| $50K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $25K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $25K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to PIPE TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 36 · 1 payment | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PIPE TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 16 · 1 payment | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to UA UNION PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS VOTE! PAC (UNITED ASSN OF JOURNEYMEN AND APPRENTICES OF THE PLUMBING & PIPEFITTING INDUSTRY · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to INT'L UNION OF ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS · 1 payment | $2.5K |
$427.5K from 10 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $6K |
$6K across 1 recipient committee, or 0.3% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 contribution · 97% of ranked | $100,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.4% of ranked | $2,500 |
| 1 contribution · 0.5% of ranked | $500 |
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Total itemized disbursements $768,067
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 46 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 14 payments · 12% of all spending | $215,192 |
| 1 payment · 7.3% of all spending | $125,925 |
| 7 payments · 6.4% of all spending | $110,662 |
| 6 payments · 4.9% of all spending | $85,700 |
| 1 payment · 4.6% of all spending | $80,000 |
| 2 payments · 3.4% of all spending | $59,000 |
| 4 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $49,324 |
| 1 payment · 0.7% of all spending | $12,500 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.