Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00490375 · files quarterly
Notices dated after Sep 30, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
32 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
National Nurses United is committed to building a broad movement for transformative social change and confronting the powerful interests that dominate our economic and political system.
We are proud to support congressional, state, and local candidates that share nurses’ values of caring, compassion, and community.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nationalnursesunited.org/national-legislation
Today’s health care system fails to provide quality, therapeutic care to every U.S. resident and wastes hundreds of billions of dollars a year in unnecessary administrative costs.
The recent cuts to health care programs from H.R.1 and the Covid-19 pandemic exposed the existing patchwork system of private for-profit insurers for what it is — ineffective, inefficient, and unjustifiably unaffordable for our patients and for our country.
Medicare for All would expand the popular Medicare program to provide comprehensive, high-quality health care that has been proven to serve the needs of patients.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nationalnursesunited.org/national-legislation
Violence against nurses and other health care workers in hospitals and other health care facilities is a growing epidemic across the United States.
Nurses report being punched, kicked, bitten, beaten, choked, and assaulted on the job — and some have faced stabbings and shootings.
The Covid-19 pandemic has exacerbated the hazard of workplace violence, with nurses reporting an increase of violent incidents on the job since the beginning of the pandemic.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nationalnursesunited.org/national-legislation
There are no federal mandates regulating the number of patients a registered nurse can care for at one time in U.S. hospitals.
As a result, registered nurses (RNs) are consistently required to care for more patients than is safe, compromising patient care and negatively impacting patient outcomes.
These dangerous conditions are causing thousands of RNs to leave the hospital bedside.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nationalnursesunited.org/national-legislation
A union gives workers the ability to act together to advocate for safe working conditions, to improve their wages and benefits, and to protect their workplace rights through collective bargaining.
For registered nurses, union advocacy and representation allows us to focus on what we do best: caring for our patients.
Attacks on unions and the right to unionize have hurt efforts to improve the lives of working families.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nationalnursesunited.org/national-legislation
Section 7422 of Title 38 of the U.S. Code limits the collective bargaining rights of certain Veterans Affairs (VA) clinical professionals, including registered nurses.
This section restricts the ability of registered nurses to speak out about poor working conditions and to resolve disputes with management.
As a result, the quality of patient care can deteriorate and problems in VA facilities can go unaddressed.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nationalnursesunited.org/national-legislation
Big Tech is driving the integration of artificial intelligence (A.I.) into virtually every aspect of our lives and has been allowed to operate without proper regulations to protect the public.
The Artificial Intelligence Data Center Moratorium Act would enact a pause on A.I. development by placing a moratorium on new data centers, putting nurses, patients, and working people in the driver’s seat.
The moratorium will give us time to build enforceable protections into law to keep ourselves, our work, and our democracy safe, and autonomy to decide how and if we want A.I. to impact our lives.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nationalnursesunited.org/national-legislation
The U.S. government supplies Israel with billions of dollars in arms and military aid that are used in violation of U.S. and international law to carry out the genocide of Palestinians in the West Bank.
Nurses firmly believe that every human being has the right to live a life free from terror, violence, and war.
The Block the Bombs Act prevents the Trump administration from sending major weapons to Israel.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nationalnursesunited.org/national-legislation
As frontline health care workers, nurses bear direct witness to the devastating, real-life human cost of war and violence.
Nurses stand firmly opposed to the Trump administration’s unconstitutional military escalations in Iran, Venezuela, Lebanon, and Cuba, conflicts launched without a declaration of war, congressional authorization, or regard for the lives of U.S. service members or the civilians caught in the crossfire.
And while the Trump administration is destroying the lives of working families everywhere — not funding health care or building a healthier country here — who benefits?
The corporate war machine and tech billionaires.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nationalnursesunited.org/national-legislation
The SAVE Act and its expanded successor, the SAVE America Act, would require all Americans to present documentary proof of citizenship, typically a passport or birth certificate, to register or update their voter registration for federal elections.
We strongly oppose this legislation and the damage it will inflict on our democracy and the citizens who participate in it.
Noncitizen voting is already a federal crime and is vanishingly rare.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nationalnursesunited.org/national-legislation
California Nurses Association/National Nurses Organizing Committee is committed to building a broad movement for transformative social change and confronting the powerful interests that dominate our economic and political system.
We are proud to support legislation that reflects nurses’ values of caring, compassion, and community.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nationalnursesunited.org/state-legislation
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Other PACs and committees | 4 | $430K · 100% |
| All recipients | 4 | $430K |
No recipient here is matched to a candidate with a state on record.
Bars drawn to $200K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 2 payments | $200K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $100K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $100K |
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Total reported receipts $6,619,964
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Total reported disbursements $5,614,370
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $4,493,295 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
Total itemized disbursements $430,398
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 9 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
$5.6M spent from Jan 2025 to Sep 2026. Most in one report: $3M, Apr 1 – Jun 30, 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending.
No lobbying disclosures matched
National Nurses United for Patient Protection is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Super PAC (independent expenditure-only). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Its FEC record names National Nurses United as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
National Nurses United for Patient Protection is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| $30K |
$430K across 4 recipient committees, or 7.7% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|
| 2 payments · 3.6% of all spending | $200,000 |
| 1 payment · 1.8% of all spending | $100,000 |
| 1 payment · 1.8% of all spending | $100,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.5% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 4 payments · <0.1% of all spending | $398 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.