Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00513176 · files monthly
“The Congressional Progressive Caucus PAC (CPC PAC) has a mission of electing strong, progressive leaders to Congress who share the Congressional Progressive Caucus PAC’s vision for America’s future. Below are just some of the issues CPC PAC will be focusing on in the 2026 election cycle.”
Congressional Progressive Caucus PAC, on its own site, weareprogressives.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
6 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Hardworking Americans deserve a budget that invests in them.
This means eliminating the arbitrary spending caps imposed by the Republicans in Congress that are crippling the nation’s economy.
It also means raising sufficient revenue to invest in repairing our infrastructure, improving education for students of all ages, supporting debt-free college, modernizing our energy systems, and keeping our communities safe.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · weareprogressives.org
Heading as listed on weareprogressives.org ↗ (opens weareprogressives.org at this heading)
22 million people rely on Social Security to keep them from slipping into poverty.
CPC PAC is dedicated to standing up for this critical program and the Americans it supports.
This includes keeping it out of the hands of Wall Street, fighting for protections against benefit garnishment as result of student loan debt, and expanding benefits.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · weareprogressives.org
Heading as listed on weareprogressives.org ↗ (opens weareprogressives.org at this heading)
Today in America, a full-time time minimum wage employee with a family of three earns 21 percent below the federal poverty line.
No one who works full time should live in poverty.
CPC PAC supports raising the Federal minimum wage from $7.25 to $15 an hour over the next several years.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · weareprogressives.org
Heading as listed on weareprogressives.org ↗ (opens weareprogressives.org at this heading)
The Supreme Court’s infamous ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission opened our election system to a flood of untraceable corporate money that has presented an unprecedented risk to our democracy.
CPC PAC believes that money is not speech, corporations are not people, and that democracy in our country should never be for sale.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · weareprogressives.org
Heading as listed on weareprogressives.org ↗ (opens weareprogressives.org at this heading)
Congressional Progressive Caucus PAC believes trade deals should always put American workers first and have an emphasis on environmental, consumer, and human rights protections.
As income inequality continues to climb to historic heights, now is the time to protect American jobs, not send them overseas.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · weareprogressives.org
Heading as listed on weareprogressives.org ↗ (opens weareprogressives.org at this heading)
The passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) meant expanded coverage and access to affordable, quality health care for millions of Americans.
At the same time, millions more of our fellow citizens remain uninsured.
CPC PAC is committed to building on the successes of the ACA, so that we can lower premiums and out-of-pocket costs, cover more Americans, and ensure that greedy pharmaceutical and health insurance companies can’t put their profits above your health.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · weareprogressives.org
Heading as listed on weareprogressives.org ↗ (opens weareprogressives.org at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 42 | $230,000 | $2,083,271 | $2,313,271 | 87% |
| Other or unresolved | 1 | $0 | $360,523 | $360,523 | 13% |
| Shown support | 43 | $230,000 | $2,443,793 | $2,673,793 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 56 | $305K · 46% |
| Other PACs and committees | 4 | $355K · 54% |
| All recipients | 60 | $660K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 9 | $50K |
| New Jersey | 4 | $30K |
| Pennsylvania | 5 | $25K |
| Illinois | 5 | $25K |
| New York | 5 | $25K |
| Michigan | 4 | $20K |
| Texas | 2 | $15K |
| Florida | 2 | $15K |
The largest 8 of 22 states.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 26,559 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.4M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 10 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Total reported receipts $6,716,968
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 5,057 contributions · 26% | $365,980 |
| 2,014 contributions · 8% | $110,826 |
Total reported disbursements $7,543,480
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $2,443,793 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$7.5M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.2M, May 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Congressional Progressive Caucus PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). Its FEC record names Battleground Blue PAC as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Congressional Progressive Caucus PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $340K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $200K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 3 payments | $26.4K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE (AAJ) · 7 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to INT'L ASSOCIATION OF BRIDGE, STRUCTURAL, ORNAMENTAL AND REINFORCING IRON WORKERS · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE FIGHTERS · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION · 2 payments | $10K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to TOGETHER WE RISE · 2 payments | $10K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BLUE TO THE FUTURE · 2 payments | $10K |
$996.4K from 121 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to BUILDING A PROGRESSIVE MAJORITY · 5 payments | $340K |
| House campaign committee · 3 payments | $15K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to JERSEY FREEDOM COALITION · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to CALIFORNIA HOUSE MAJORITY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BOB BROOKS VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments |
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| 2,542 contributions · 7.7% |
| $106,397 |
| 1,450 contributions · 4.1% | $57,458 |
| 885 contributions · 4.1% | $57,133 |
| 808 contributions · 3.7% | $51,430 |
| 762 contributions · 3.7% | $51,176 |
| 243 contributions · 3.6% | $49,688 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1,623 contributions · 34% of ranked | $132,043 |
| 2 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2% of ranked | $7,500 |
| 2 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $5,500 |
| 4 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $5,250 |
| 1 contribution · 1.3% of ranked | $5,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.3% of ranked | $5,000 |
A further $932,348 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($3,945,601) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 19,252 contributions · 65% of ranked | $872,013 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,182 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $48,779 |
| 553 contributions · 3% of ranked | $40,579 |
| 359 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $22,935 |
| 48 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $21,139 |
| 21 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $11,027 |
| 176 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $10,073 |
| 5 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $9,500 |
A further $10,122 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($3,945,601) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $5,041,846
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,574 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
120 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $832,007 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 58 payments · 15% of all spending | $1,165,289 |
| 171 payments · 11% of all spending | $830,653 |
| 9 payments · 4.7% of all spending | $353,289 |
| 5 payments · 4.5% of all spending | $340,000 |
| 23 payments · 4.2% of all spending | $316,061 |
| 11 payments · 3.7% of all spending | $276,139 |
| 112 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $213,814 |
| 7 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $120,256 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| $10K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to THE DEMOCRATIC BENCH FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to WILLIAM LAWRENCE VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
$667.5K across 54 recipient committees, or 8.8% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown. A further $2.2K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.