American Association for Justice lobbied on 8 issues. See lobbying
Its wordsWhat does this committee say it is for?
Why this committee exists In its own words
“AAJ promotes justice and fairness for injured persons, safeguards victims' rights—particularly the right to trial by jury—and strengthens the civil justice system through education and disclosure of information critical to public health and safety. With members worldwide, and a network of U.S. and Canadian affiliates involved in diverse areas of trial advocacy, AAJ provides lawyers with the information and professional assistance needed to serve clients successfully and protect the democratic values inherent in the civil justice system.”
American Association for Justice PAC, on its own site, justice.org
CauseCivil justice
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
14 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
14 priorities · 5 parts · 47 quoted statements
AAJ protects the constitutional right to a trial by jury and safeguards the right to pursue justice in court for harms caused by the negligence or misconduct of others.
When the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault & Sexual Harassment became law, we knew our work to end forced arbitration would continue.
There's a new bill to end forced arbitration for race discrimination.
Forced arbitration allows race discrimination and racially hostile environments to flourish unabated and without consequence to those who perpetuate it.
AAJ is working to ensure crash victims receive justice.
Individuals and families seeking justice in our nation’s courtrooms face overwhelming odds when up against large and powerful corporations.
This is why AAJ recognizes that selecting judicial nominees with experience and expertise in representing individuals is of paramount importance in order to restore fairness and transparency to the federal judiciary.
It is time for the next president to nominate attorneys who have fought to enforce the rights and protections of people, not corporations.
AAJ protects the constitutional right to trial by jury and safeguards the right to pursue justice in court for harms caused by the negligence or misconduct of others.
Have you signed an employment contract, enrolled with a new cable, cell phone, or credit card provider, taken out a loan, or downloaded an app?
You likely signed or clicked away your right to hold a corporation accountable when they break the law or violate your rights.
When you sign or click a contract containing a forced arbitration clause, and then are cheated, discriminated against, assaulted, or otherwise harmed, the company will force you into a secret, rigged forced arbitration system.
On September 17, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) changed its longstanding shareholder forced arbitration policy.
The new policy is a radical shift that puts investors at risk of massive losses, shields companies that commit fraud from public accountability, and could depress shareholder value and stock prices while undermining confidence in our capital markets.
This stark reversal from the Commission’s well-established, decades-old policy will inject chaos into U.S. markets, creating a more volatile environment for investors, shareholders, and businesses – and any company that includes a forced arbitration provision in its IPO filing will face legal challenges that will delay the offering indefinitely and result in significant risk and expense.
The number of people injured in large truck crashes has more than doubled over the last 10 years, while fatalities increased 43%.
While trucking has become more dangerous for others on the road, the federal minimum insurance requirement for trucking companies has not been raised since 1980, and does not match inflation or rising medical costs.
A fatal truck crash costs about $4.9 million in direct costs, but carriers are only required to carry insurance of $750,000.
The unjust ‘qualified immunity’ doctrine shields law enforcement officers and other government actors from lawsuits, even when these officials violate the constitutional or civil rights of the people they are sworn to protect.
Worse, over the past 50 years, this doctrine has been expanded by the courts, and many states have adopted similar doctrines.
As a result, individuals hurt or the families of those killed by police brutality often have no way to hold officers accountable.
Corporations are demanding sweeping immunity when they expose their workers or customers to COVID-19—allowing them to evade responsibility when they fail to protect our health and safety.
The final amendment to Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(A) eliminates the requirement that a prior inconsistent statement is admissible over a hearsay objection only if it was given under penalty of perjury.
It allows any prior inconsistent statement by a declarant-witness to be admissible as substantive evidence, subject to exclusion under Rule 403, making its application easier for juries when evaluating inconsistent statements.
The proposed amendments conform with the approach for prior consistent statements and eliminate the need for confusing limiting instructions when prior inconsistent statements are offered.
The following amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy 9014 and 9017, and new Rule 7043, address remote testimony in bankruptcy cases:
BR 9014 will allow a court in a contested matter to have more flexibility to permit remote witness testimony “for cause and with appropriate safeguards,” eliminating the requirement of “compelling circumstances.”
*NEW* BR 7043 will apply specifically to adversary proceedings and retains the applicability of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 43, thereby continuing to authorize remote witness testimony in adversary proceedings “for good cause in compelling circumstances and with appropriate safeguards.”
BR 9017 is amended in light of these changes to remove the general applicability of FRCP 43 to all bankruptcy cases.
The Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules proposed new Federal Rule of Evidence 707 to require courts to evaluate the reliability of machine-generated evidence under a framework modeled on Rule 702.
As drafted, the proposal would subject outputs generated by machines—including software and other technological systems—to judicial gatekeeping to ensure that the evidence reflects reliable principles and methods and a reliable application to the facts of the case.
AAJ filed a formal comment on February 16, 2026 urging the Committee to pause and redraft the proposal, arguing that the rule is overly broad and would sweep in vast categories of routinely admitted evidence, such as geolocation data, surveillance footage, electronic health records, and other commonly relied-upon digital information.
The Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules proposed amendments to Federal Rule of Evidence 609 to make the balancing test for admitting prior criminal convictions more protective of criminal defendants.
Rather than abrogating Rule 609(a)(1), the proposal retains impeachment with non-falsity convictions but emphasizes that such convictions should be admitted against a criminal defendant only when their probative value substantially outweighs the risk of unfair prejudice, reinforcing the reverse-balancing framework Congress originally adopted.
In February 2026, AAJ filed a formal comment supporting the proposed amendment and recommending minor clarifying edits to the Committee Note.
The Advisory Committee on Civil Rules proposed amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(c), along with related changes to Rule 26(a), to clarify that courts may compel remote trial testimony from witnesses located anywhere in the United States, so long as the witness is not required to travel beyond Rule 45(c)’s 100-mile limitation.
The proposal responds to the Ninth Circuit’s decision in In re Kirkland, which interpreted the rule to restrict subpoena authority based on the physical location of the courtroom, and seeks to restore nationwide subpoena power while preserving protections against undue travel burdens.
AAJ filed a formal comment on February 13, 2026 supporting the proposed amendments and agreeing that they properly correct Kirkland and modernize subpoena authority.
The Advisory Committee on Civil Rules proposed amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) to clarify and modernize voluntary dismissal practice, particularly in complex litigation involving multiple claims or parties.
The proposed amendments would resolve a circuit split by permitting plaintiffs to voluntarily dismiss “one or more claims” rather than only entire actions and streamlining stipulations of dismissal by requiring signatures only from parties currently remaining in the case.
In February 2026, AAJ filed a formal comment supporting efforts to clarify voluntary dismissal procedures while urging the Committee to preserve plaintiffs’ flexible dismissal tools and existing safeguards.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution$2.2M to 309 candidates
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
For candidates $2,200,000
Democratic 94%
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$2,691,500 in 1,088 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic candidates
271
$2.1M · 76%
Republican candidates
16
$66K · 2.4%
Other or unresolved candidates
24
$73.5K · 2.7%
Democratic party committees
7
$127K · 4.7%
Other party committees
1
$5K · 0.2%
Other PACs and committees
62
$381K · 14%
All recipients
381
$2.7M
By the candidate’s state
Contributions to candidates by the candidate’s state
State
Candidates
Amount
California
46
$336K
New York
20
$140.5K
Texas
17
$116K
Illinois
19
$111.5K
Florida
16
$108K
Virginia
11
$106K
Pennsylvania
12
$86K
New Jersey
10
$72K
The largest 8 of 46 states.
Recipients 381
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $6,649,894 reported receipts
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$5,835,06688%
Largest donors
Russell W. Budd5 contributions, latest Apr 2, 2026 · DALLAS, TX$25,000
Matthew Gaier4 contributions, latest May 5, 2026 · ATTORNEY · KRAMER DILLOF LIVINGSTON & MOORE · NEW YORK, NY$20,000
Judith A. Livingston3 contributions, latest May 11, 2026 · NEW YORK, NY$15,000
Thomas A. Moore3 contributions, latest May 11, 2026 · NEW YORK, NY$15,000
Carmine Rubino3 contributions, latest May 11, 2026 · ROCKVILLE CENTRE, NY$15,000
Jonathan H. Lomurro3 contributions, latest May 29, 2026 · FREEHOLD, NJ$14,850
Howard Hamilton Ankin2 contributions, latest Feb 10, 2026 · ATTORNEY · ANKIN LAW OFFICE, LLC · CHICAGO, IL$10,000
Matthew P. Bergman2 contributions, latest Mar 12, 2026 · ATTORNEY · SELF EMPLOYED · SEATTLE, WA$10,000
Mark J. Bernstein2 contributions, latest Jun 2, 2026 · ATTORNEY · THE SAM BERNSTEIN LAW FIRM · FARMINGTON HILLS, MI$10,000
Lisa J.D. Blue2 contributions, latest Jun 3, 2026 · ATTORNEY · LISA BLUE · DALLAS, TX$10,000
Leo V. Boyle2 contributions, latest Feb 4, 2026 · ATTORNEY · MEEHAN, BOYLE, BLACK & BOGDANOW, PC · DOVER, MA$10,000
Michael S. Burg2 contributions, latest Jun 24, 2026 · ATTORNEY · BURG SIMPSON ELDREDGE HERSH & JARDINE, · ENGLEWOOD, CO$10,000
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 22,625 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $4.9M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$779,82912%
Refunds and rebatesMoney coming back to the committee: rebates and refunds of what it spent, contributions it made that were returned, and loans it made that were repaid.$35,0000.5%
Total reported receipts $6,649,894
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $4,865,587 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $17.8K
$17.8K+
$71.4K+
$160.6K+
$285.5K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
California1,695 contributions · 9.2%
$446,115
Texas1,493 contributions · 7.8%
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $5,902,314 reported
Contributions to candidates and other committeesMoney given to federal candidates, party committees and other PACs.$2,704,50046%
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $20,000 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$2,691,50093%
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$192,0486.6%
Filed as
CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEES$192,048
Paid to
American Express$96,838
Vantiv LLC$95,210
Spending over time
$5.9M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $595.1K, August 2026.
$5.9M
Jan 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
What American Association for Justice lobbies on 2026 reports
Besides giving through its PAC, American Association for Justice pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Spent on lobbying in 2026
$4.9M
Quarterly reports read
20
Bills it named
168
Topics it lobbied on
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
Consumer Issues/Safety/Productsin 12 report entries · 33 bills named
In its own words
Draft legislation and general lobbying with regard to PFAS.
Draft asbestos ban legislation and general lobbying with regard to asbestos and talc.
General lobbying on ending the use of forced arbitration for consumers, patients, service members, and workers and on draft legislation to end the use of forced arbitration.
General lobbying with regard to forced arbitration in nursing homes and with regard to corporate accountability in nursing homes.
General lobbying with regard to the testing of talc for asbestos/Chrysotile rule.
General lobbying with regard to FIFRA preemption.
General lobbying with regard to glyphosate safety.
Agricultural Labeling Uniformity Act.
H.R.6212 - Good Samaritan Menstrual Products Act with specific regard to liability immunity.
General lobbying on right to repair wheelchairs.
H.R. 1354 Justice for All Act of 2025.
S. 346 Knife Ownership Protection Act of 2025.
H.R. 60 Knife Ownership Protection Act of 2025.
S.246 - Interstate Transport Act of 2025.
General lobbying with regard to the vaccine injury compensation program.
H.R.2300 To ensure national uniformity with respect to certain requirements relating to preterm infant formula, and for other purposes.
H.R. 4121 Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026.
S. 2324 Pesticide Injury Accountability Act of 2025.
H.R.4754 Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026 with specific regard to issues relating to the Environmental Protection Agency.
S.2431 Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2026 with specific regard to issues relating to the Environmental Protection Agency.
S.2703 Protecting Older Americans Act of 2025.
H.R.5115 Protecting Older Americans Act of 2025.
S.2811 Alan Reinstein Ban Asbestos Now Act of 2025.
H.R.5373 Alan Reinstein Ban Asbestos Now Act of 2025.
H.R.5350 FAIR Act of 2025.
S. 2799 FAIR Act of 2025.
H.R.3548 Infrastructure Expansion Act of 2025.
H.R. 5437 - Protection of Lawful Commerce in Stone Slab Products Act.
General lobbying on TSCA reauthorization.
H.R.6172 - Ending Forced Arbitration of Race Discrimination Act of 2025.
S.3243 - Ending Forced Arbitration of Race Discrimination Act of 2025.
S.3966 - TREY'S Law.
H.R.6453 - ADA 30 Days to Comply Act.
H.R.7567 - Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026 with specific regard to civil justice issues.
Draft legislation on the CLAIM Act.
H.R.7601 - No Immunity for Glyphosate Act.
Draft legislation on rideshare safety.
Draft legislation on CERCLA immunity.
Draft legislation on preemption determinations pertaining to the transportation of hazardous materials.
S.4940 - Specialized Infant Formula Protection Act.
H.R.9528 - People Over Poison Act.
S.5526 - Agricultural Act of 2026 with specific regard to FIFRA preemption.
H.R.9807 - Americans vs. Poisonous Pesticides Act.
General lobbying in regard to artificial stone slab manufacturing.
General lobbying in regard to refunds for prepaid reward cards.
Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2025 with specific regard to FIFRA preemption.
Good Samaritan Menstrual Products Act with specific regard to liability immunity.
Issues related to protecting kids online.
Issues related to AI and kids safety.
Executive Order Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence.
H.R.6291 - Children and Teens Online Privacy Protection Act.
H.R.6484 - Kids Online Safety Act.
H.R.7757 - KIDS Act.
H.R.6265 - Safer GAMING Act.
S.4407 Children's Health, Advancement, Trust, Boundaries, and Oversight in Technology (CHATBOT) Act.
Government Issuesin 6 report entries · 20 bills named
In its own words
General lobbying related to FIFRA preemption.
General lobbying with regard to nonconsensual third-party releases and stays in bankruptcy proceedings.
General lobbying with regard to diversity jurisdiction.
General lobbying with regard to federal officer removal.
General lobbying with regard to liability in voluntary information sharing programs.
General lobbying with regard to litigation financing.
General lobbying with regard to Johnson & Johnson and the Texas Two-Step.
General lobbying and on draft legislation with regard pipeline voluntary information sharing system programs.
General lobbying with regard to age discrimination bill.
General lobbying on whistleblower issues.
H.R. 1109 Litigation Transparency Fairness Act of 2025.
H.R. 1702 JUDGES Act of 2025.
H.R. 1929 JUDGES Act of 2025.
H.R. 1526 No Rogue Rulings Act.
General lobbying as to restrictions on nationwide injunctions.
General lobbying as to payment of attorney's fees.
H.R. 1732 Guard VA Benefits Act.
General lobbying on veteran benefits.
General lobbying on private equity and veterans' healthcare.
General lobbying as to judicial forum selection and case assignments.
General lobbying on accountability for violations of Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act.
Labor Issues/Antitrust/Workplacein 6 report entries · 16 bills named
In its own words
H.R.4868 - College Athlete Economic Freedom Act.
S.2470 - College Athlete Economic Freedom Act.
General lobbying with regard to ending forced arbitration in employment claims.
General lobbying and on draft legislation with regard to name, image, and likeness (NIL).
S. 2026 Court Legal Access and Student Support Act (CLASS) Act.
H.R. 3938 Court Legal Access and Student Support Act (CLASS) Act.
H.R. 2688 Protecting Student Athletes Economic Freedom Act of 2025.
H.R. 2663 Restore College Sports Act.
H.R. 4312 SCORE Act.
S.2932 Student Athlete Fairness and Enforcement Act.
H.R.6350 - College Athletics Reform Act.
H.R.5267 - American Franchise Act.
H.R.2988 - Protecting Prudent Investment of Retirement Savings Act.
H.R.5169 - Retire through Ownership Act.
H.R.4624 - Muhammad Ali American Boxing Revival Act of 2026.
S.4668 - Protect College Sports Act of 2026.
H.R.9137 - Protect College Sports Act of 2026.
H.R.8660 - Valuing Employee Stock Today Act.
Opposing liability limits or antitrust exemptions for the NCAA and member schools in the Protect College Sports Act, S. 4668
Opposing liability limits or antitrust exemptions for the NCAA and member schools
16 bills named
Taxation/Internal Revenue Codein 6 report entries · 6 bills named
In its own words
S. 467 End Double Taxation of Successful Consumer Claims Act.
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to establish a deduction for attorney fees awarded with respect to certain wildfire damages and to exclude from gross income settlement funds received with respect to such damages.
General lobbying with regard to tax reform.
S. 584 Tax Fairness for Survivors Act.
H.R. 1306 Tax Fairness for Survivors Act.
S. 1281 Tackling Predatory Litigation Funding Act.
H.R. 1732 Guard VA Benefits Act General lobbying with regard to private equity ownership of nursing homes.
General lobbying with regard to preemption of state common law.
General lobbying with regard to Camp Lejeune Justice Act.
S.907 Ensuring Justice for Camp Lejeune Victims Act of 2025.
S. 140 Wildfire Prevention Act of 2025.
Draft legislation related to compensation for Vieques residents.
H.R.1656 PLUS for Veterans Act of 2025.
S. 907 Ensuring Justice for Camp Lejeune Victims Act of 2025.
H.R. 99 Protecting Businesses From Frivolous COVID Lawsuits Act of 2025.
H.R. 3132 CHOICE for Veterans Act of 2025.
H.R.3509 Supporting Our Surviving Spouses Act.
S.3470 - Accountability for Federal Law Enforcement Act.
H.R.7290 - Qualified Immunity Accountability Act.
H.R.6091 - Bivens Act of 2025.
S.3187 - Bivens Act of 2025.
H.R.8330 - Stop Climate Shakedowns Act of 2026.
H.R.9338 - Pipeline Safety Authorization Act of 2026.
H.R.9883 - Private Detention Corporate Accountability Act of 2026.
H.R.5301 - PIPES Act of 2025.
S.3983 - End Foreign Abuse of United States Courts Act.
Protecting state laws that allow polluters to be held accountable in court and by state legislatures Opposing the Stop Climate Shakedowns Act, HR. 8330 and S. 4340 Protecting state laws that allow pesticide manufacturers to be held accountable in court Protecting state laws that allow car manufacturers to be held accountable in court
Financial Institutions/Investments/Securitiesin 5 report entries · 12 bills named
In its own words
HR 2392, STABLE Act of 2025.
S. 394, GENIUS Act of 2025.
General lobbying on the importance of minority viewpoints on the Securities and Exchange Commission.
General lobbying on shareholder forced arbitration and forum selection clauses in corporate bylaws.
General lobbying with regard to the use of forced arbitration in financial services and by big banks.
General lobbying with regard to SEC nominations.
General lobbying with regard to Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).
General lobbying with regard to cryptocurrency.
General lobbying on shareholder proposals impacting corporate accountability and undermining shareholder rights.
Draft Senate FSGG appropriations bill.
General lobbying with regard to digital commodities.
S. 424 Retirement Fairness for Charities and Educational Institutions Act of 2025.
H.R. 1013 Retirement Fairness for Charities and Educational Institutions Act of 2025.
H.R. 3633 CLARITY Act.
General lobbying on SEC and forced shareholder arbitration.
Draft legislation on digital asset market structure.
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLPLobbying firm · 3 reportsNot reported
Contributions on the LD-203 report
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $1K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC)$1K
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE”, found by searching “AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Oct 26, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AAJ PAC)
Filings covered
Through Oct 14, 2026
Data source
FEC bulk filing data
American Association for Justice PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Its FEC record names American Association for Justice as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
American Association for Justice PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
Structured organization facts
Identity match
Exact FEC committee ID in LittleSis
Match confidence
high
Source coverage
Official pages captured
69
LittleSis classifications
Organization, Political Fundraising Committee, Other Campaign Committee
Bars drawn to $55K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Christian Menefee7 receipts, latest Oct 13, 2026Christian D. Menefee for Congress · H6TX18232$18.5K
James Walkinshaw5 receipts, latest Oct 13, 2026Walkinshaw for Congress · H6VA11066$15K
Mike McGuire3 receipts, latest Jul 8, 2026Mike Mcguire for Congress · H6CA01269$12.5K
Debbie Dingell4 receipts, latest Oct 2, 2026Debbie Dingell for Congress · H4MI12079$10K
Thomas Suozzi4 receipts, latest May 22, 2026Suozzi for Congress · H6NY03247$10K
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
The Markey CommitteeSenate campaign committee · Connected to MARKEY VICTORY FUND · 4 payments
$10K
$2.7M across 385 recipient committees, or 46% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
$379,986
Florida1,099 contributions · 7.1%
$344,612
New York704 contributions · 5.1%
$250,437
Illinois725 contributions · 5.1%
$246,345
Pennsylvania919 contributions · 4%
$194,706
Virginia869 contributions · 3.8%
$185,041
Maryland1,169 contributions · 3.7%
$180,529
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 423 contributions · 3.3% of ranked
$87,081
Stark & Stark188 contributions · 1.7% of ranked
$45,611
Kramer Dillof Livingston & Moore9 contributions · 1.7% of ranked
$45,000
Koskoff Koskoff & Bieder PC125 contributions · 1.6% of ranked
$42,057
Waters Kraus Paul & Siegel135 contributions · 1.6% of ranked
$41,898
Motley Rice LLC93 contributions · 1.4% of ranked
$38,546
Clifford LAW Offices PC42 contributions · 1.4% of ranked
$38,355
Kreindler & Kreindler LLP103 contributions · 1.3% of ranked
$34,058
A further $40,768 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($779,829) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
Attorney22,563 contributions · 100% of ranked
$4,824,894
A further $40,768 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($779,829) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$11,8150.4%
Filed as
BANK MAINTENANCE FEES$11,815
Paid to
PNC Bank, N.A.$10,525
Cibc Bank$1,291
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$9,1150.3%
Filed as
INTEREST PAYMENT ON LOAN$9,115
Paid to
Cibc Bank$9,115
Total itemized disbursements $2,904,477
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,166 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
American Express22 payments · 1.6% of all spending
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
H.R. 2444 Promoting Resilient Supply Chains Act of 2025.
S. 1099 Nationwide Injunction Abuse Prevention Act of 2025.
H.R. 1789 PEPPER Act.
H.R. 1 One Big Beautiful Bill Act with specific regard to civil justice issues, including the AI moratorium.
Draft legislation on executive expenditures.
H.R. 2675 Protecting Our Courts from Foreign Manipulation Act of 2025.
H.R. 3454 Protecting Our Constitution and Communities Act.
S. 1206 Judicial Relief and Clarification Act of 2025.
S. 1099 The Nationwide Injunction Abuse Prevention Act of 2025.
S. 1090 Restraining Judicial Insurrectionist Act of 2025.
S. 524 Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2025.
H.R.3838 Streamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026 with specific regard to liability immunity.
H.R.6938 - Commerce, Justice, Science;
Energy and Water Development; and Interior and Environment Appropriations Act, 2026.
H.R.7934 - Settlement Agreement Information Database Act of 2026.
H.R.7148 - Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026.
H.R.7015 - Protecting TPLF From Abuse Act.
Draft legislation on service member sexual assault.
Draft legislation on the GUARD Act.
H.R.8800 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2027 with specific regard to civil justice issues.
General lobbying with regard to reforms to the Department of Justice's Judgment Fund.
General lobbying with regard to judicial nominations, including with specific regard to the nomination of Anna St. John to the Eastern District of Louisiana.
General lobbying on draft legislation with regard to pipeline voluntary information sharing system programs.
General issues related to judicial nominations. Issues related to any upcoming CR and possible government shutdown.
General issues related to judicial nominations. Issues related to latest CR and Government shutdown.
Protecting state laws that allow polluters to be held accountable in court and by state legislatures Protecting state laws that allow pesticide manufacturers to be held accountable in court Protecting state laws that allow car manufacturers to be held accountable in court