This committee’s site publishes no list of positions we could read, and we found no statement of why it exists. We do not write one for it.
Who it gives toWhich candidates and committees get its money?
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Party support distribution
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
No candidate-directed contributions or explicitly supportive independent expenditures were returned.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Who this PAC gave to$2,000 in 2 payments
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
By recipient
Line 23 contributions by kind and party of recipient
Recipient
Count
Amount
Democratic party committees
2
$2K · 100%
All recipients
2
$2K
By the candidate’s state
No recipient here is matched to a candidate with a state on record.
Bars drawn to $1.5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Show candidate activity and the money network
Candidate and election activity as the recipients filed it
Nothing loaded
No candidate committee activity was returned for this PAC.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Committee money network
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees funding this one
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
$2K across 2 recipient committees, or 0.2% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Money inWho funds the PAC?
Where the money came from $1,285,235 reported receipts
Itemized (over $200)Donors who have given more than $200 this cycle, so the FEC itemizes (names) them.$632,71849%
Adam Jacobs2 contributions, latest Sep 28, 2025 · NOT EMPLOYED · N/A · DEL MAR, CA$7,000
Amy Jacobs2 contributions, latest Sep 28, 2025 · RETIRED · N/A · DEL MAR, CA$7,000
Debby Jacobs2 contributions, latest Aug 24, 2025 · NOT EMPLOYED · N/A · LA JOLLA, CA$7,000
Gary Jacobs2 contributions, latest Sep 21, 2025 · INVESTOR · JACOBS INVESTMENT COMPANY LLC · DEL MAR, CA$7,000
Hal Jacobs2 contributions, latest Sep 8, 2025 · OWNER · RANCHO VALENCIA · LA JOLLA, CA$7,000
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 4,421 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $630.5K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Unitemized ($200 or less)Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle, so the FEC does not itemize (name) them.$565,86544%
PACs and other committeesPolitical action committees and other candidates' committees.$76,0005.9%
Committees that gave
Votevets1 receipt, latest Dec 4, 2025 · Hybrid pac (qualified)$5,000
Not itemized by sourceReported receipts that none of the summary's lines accounts for.$10,6020.8%
Other receiptsInterest, dividends and other income the committee files on a line of its own.$51<0.1%
Total reported receipts $1,285,235
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs
Where the donors live $630,486 placed by state
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
under $19.6K
$19.6K+
$78.5K+
$176.6K+
$314K+
none
Top states
Top donor states
Name
Amount
California1,589 contributions · 78%
$490,671
Florida198 contributions · 2.8%
$17,499
New York219 contributions · 2.5%
SpendingWhere does the money go?
How the spending splits $1,285,924 reported
Not itemized by lineReported disbursements the committee's own summary assigns to none of the lines above. Rare once every line is read: all 40 of the largest PACs balance to the dollar without it.$1,170,52291%
Operating expendituresThe committee's own running costs.$98,2887.6%
Mora Consulting3 payments · latest Nov 26, 2025 · COMPLIANCE SERVICES$25,154
Viewpoint Media LLC6 payments · latest May 12, 2026 · DIGITAL ADVERTISING$19,250
Contribution refundsMoney returned to the people and committees that gave it.$12,1140.9%
Other disbursementsEverything the committee reports outside the lines above.$3,0000.2%
Transfers to affiliated committeesMoney moved to a committee under the same sponsor or party.$2,0000.2%
Total reported disbursements $1,285,924
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
What the payments were for $1,170,947 itemized
Fundraising and eventsThe cost of raising money: finance consultants, donor list rental and acquisition, event venues, catering, and donor processing.$356,19130%
Filed as
LIST ACQUISITION$118,937
FUNDRAISING CONSULTING SERVICES$101,590
TEXT MESSAGING & LIST ACQUISITION$67,240
FUNDRAISING COMMISSION$25,954
Spending over time
$1.3M spent from Jul 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $471.7K, Apr 1 – May 13, 2026.
$1.3M
Jul 2025Oct 2026
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
A name search for “ELECTING ETHICAL DEMOCRATS” in Lobbying Disclosure Act filings found no issues reported. FEC and the Senate share no organization identifier, so lobbying is matched by name; a sponsor that lobbies under another name is not found.
Electing Ethical Democrats is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
Structured organization facts
Identity match
Editorially reviewed organization match
Match confidence
low
Source coverage
Official pages captured
1
Last captured
Sep 29, 2026
$1,000
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
$15,618
Pennsylvania213 contributions · 1.7%
$11,001
Texas270 contributions · 1.7%
$10,681
District of Columbia13 contributions · 1.2%
$7,270
Nevada12 contributions · 1.2%
$7,253
Arkansas16 contributions · 1.1%
$7,210
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Donors’ employers as filed
Donors’ employers
Employer as filed
Amount
Self-employedWritten instead of an employer · 237 contributions · 19% of ranked
$62,484
US House Of Representatives4 contributions · 2.6% of ranked
$8,250
Bayyari Properties2 contributions · 2.2% of ranked
$7,000
Delerrok INC2 contributions · 2.2% of ranked
$7,000
Food Fight Labs2 contributions · 2.2% of ranked
$7,000
G G Greene Enterprises2 contributions · 2.2% of ranked
$7,000
Globalstar2 contributions · 2.2% of ranked
$7,000
Jacobs Investment Company LLC2 contributions · 2.2% of ranked
$7,000
A further $307,825 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($565,865) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Donors’ occupations as filed
Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed
Amount
RetiredWritten instead of an occupation · 3,460 contributions · 33% of ranked
$209,140
Not employedWritten instead of an occupation · 108 contributions · 15% of ranked
$93,357
Owner27 contributions · 4.9% of ranked
$30,814
Attorney30 contributions · 3.6% of ranked
$22,390
CEO19 contributions · 3.2% of ranked
$20,019
Consultant12 contributions · 2.4% of ranked
$15,250
Executive10 contributions · 1.6% of ranked
$10,250
Investor3 contributions · 1.4% of ranked
$9,000
A further $5,328 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($565,865) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
DIGITAL CONSULTING ,TEXT MESSAGING SERVICES, & LIST ACQUISITION
$17,705
FUNDRAISING CONSULTING SERVICES, SOFTWARE & TEXT MESSAGING SERVICES$9,840
ONLINE FUNDRAISING SOFTWARE$3,749
EVENT PLANNING SERVICES$3,000
CATERING & ROOM RENTAL$2,981
CATERING$2,806
FUNDRAISING SOFTWARE$1,430
FUNDRAISING & DATA CONSULTING SERVICES$800
Paid to
Mothership Strategies$178,357
Bluebird Technolgies LLC$67,240
Daily Consulting$48,000
Premier Fiorello Consulting$38,500
The Whitewood Group$6,305
Everyaction, Inc.$3,749
Printing, mail, and shippingPrinted literature, direct mail, postage, design, and delivery.$259,83022%
Filed as
DIRECT MAIL$252,789
IN-KIND - WEBSITE, GRAPHICS, DESIGNS AND LOGOS$3,500
PRINTING$1,288
PRINTING & SHIPPING$895
PRINTING & SHIPPING$849
IN-KIND - BEVERAGES AND PRINTING$235
POSTAGE$234
PRINTED MATERIAL$40
Paid to
Pivot Group, Inc.$254,533
Bujkovsky, Brina$3,500
Mcnew, Andrea$670
Uribe Printing$386
Shutman, Nate$235
U.S. Postal Service$234
Digital and technologyWebsites, hosting, software subscriptions, databases, email, and texting platforms.$161,09014%
Filed as
TEXT MESSAGING SERVICES$79,703
SOFTWARE$58,800
TEXTING SERVICES$16,115
SUBSCRIPTION$2,978
WEBSITE SERVICES$2,900
MASS EMAIL SOFTWARE$595
Paid to
Mothership Strategies$80,020
Everyaction, Inc.$45,269
Bluebird Technolgies LLC$14,915
Numero, Inc.$6,655
Voicedrop$2,981
Mailchimp$2,978
Consulting and strategyStrategic, political, legal, and compliance consulting, and campaign management.$157,37313%
Filed as
DIGITAL CONSULTING & TEXT MESSAGING SERVICES$50,435
COMPLIANCE SERVICES$34,634
STRATEGIC CONSULTING SERVICES$27,250
CAMPAIGN MANAGEMENT SERVICES$14,000
COMMUNICATIONS CONSULTING SERVICES$13,800
FINANCIAL CONSULTING SERVICES$5,968
STRATEGIC CONSULTING SERVICES, STORAGE UNIT & REFERENCE MATERIALS.$5,322
IN-KIND CAMPAIGN CONSULTING$3,500
LEGAL SERVICES$2,465
Paid to
Mothership Strategies$50,435
MMC Strategies LLC$29,072
Mora Consulting$20,154
Mcnew, Andrea$17,500
Premier Political Compliance$14,480
Echo Communications Advisors$13,800
Polling and researchSurveys, opposition research, voter file work, and analytics.$53,3944.6%
Filed as
POLLING SERVICES$52,394
DATA CONSULTING SERVICES$1,000
Paid to
Gbao$43,900
Chism Strategies$8,494
Gidwani, Chailuv$1,000
Taxes, fees, and bank chargesPayroll and income taxes, filing fees, bank and merchant processing charges.$45,8893.9%
Filed as
MERCHANT FEE$15,353
PAYROLL TAXES$12,593
FILING FEE$8,873
BOOKKEEPING, POSTAGE, COPIES, SUPPLIES AND SOFTWARE FEE$5,810
STORAGE UNIT FEES$1,350
MERCHANT FEES$753
IN-KIND - STORAGE UNIT FEES$540
BANK FEE$310
REGISTRATION FEE$309
Paid to
ActBlue Technical Services$16,105
Gusto, Inc.$12,593
Mora Consulting$5,000
Riverside County Registrar of Voters$4,000
SAN Diego County Registrar of Voters$3,225
California Secretary of State$1,648
Advertising and mediaBroadcast, digital, and print advertising, and the media buying behind it.$31,0822.7%
Filed as
DIGITAL ADVERTISING$19,250
MEDIA PRODUCTION SERVICES$5,000
VIDEO PRODUCTION SERVICES$3,832
IN-KIND - SOCIAL MEDIA SERVICES$3,000
Paid to
Viewpoint Media LLC$19,250
Progressive Victory LLC$5,000
Sena Kozar Strategies$3,832
Behrman, Andrew$3,000
Payroll and staffSalaries, wages, benefits, and payroll services.$30,6982.6%
Filed as
SALARY$30,498
PAYROLL SERVICES$200
Paid to
Gidwani, Chailuv$10,485
Mcnew, Andrea$9,265
Wetherbee, Jacob$5,747
Rubel, Matthew$5,001
Gusto, Inc.$200
Card paymentsPaid to a card processor with no itemisation filed beneath it, so the purchases behind it are not on the record.$28,1272.4%
Filed as
CREDIT CARD PROCESSING FEES$28,127
Paid to
ActBlue Technical Services$28,127
Office and administrativeRent, utilities, phones, supplies, equipment, security, food, and campaign merchandise.$20,8571.8%
Filed as
OPERATIONS & ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES$8,000
PHOTOGRAPHY$3,500
IN-KIND - OFFICE SPACE$3,000
IN-KIND - VALET SERVICES, FOOD AND BEVERAGES$2,800
IN-KIND - PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES$1,650
IN-KIND - FOOD AND BEVERAGE$1,000
STORAGE UNIT RENTAL$540
INSURANCE$367
Paid to
Wetherbee, Jacob$8,000
Pivot Group, Inc.$3,500
Rzeslawski, Minnie$3,000
Daily Smith, Stephanie$2,800
Rzeslawski, Ciara$1,650
Rzeslawski, Luis$1,000
OtherPayments whose filed description does not match any category above. Every one is listed so it can be read directly.$19,5701.7%
Filed as
IN-KIND - TREASURERE SERVICES$3,500
IN-KIND - CAMPAIGN ARTWORK$3,500
YARDSIGNS$3,412
IN-KIND - LAPTOPS AND CHAIRS$3,410
IN-KIND - LAPTOPS$2,500
OPERATIONS ADVISOR SERVICES$2,000
DIGITAL SERVICES$750
VOICEMAIL$498
Paid to
Mora, Renee$3,500
Moreno, Martin$3,500
IMS Intermarket Manufacturing Service, Inc.$3,412
Prieto, Celso$3,410
Rzeslawski, Luis$2,500
Wetherbee, Jacob$2,000
TravelAirfare, lodging, mileage, and ground transport.$4,6460.4%
Filed as
TRAVEL$3,100
REIMBURSEMENT - MILEAGE$1,401
REIMBURSEMENT - PARKING$145
Paid to
Marriott Marquis$1,038
Wetherbee, Jacob$827
Mcnew, Andrea$713
Alaska Airlines, Inc$572
Frontier Airlines$494
United Airlines$417
Given to othersContributions to other candidates, party committees, and PACs.$2,0000.2%
Filed as
CONTRIBUTION$2,000
Paid to
Riverside County Democratic Party$1,500
California Democratic Party$500
Not broken out by the committeeReported as a lump sum, with memo entries pointed to for the detail. Where those entries were filed and read, this page counts the payees they name instead; what is left here was never itemised.$199<0.1%
Filed as
REIMBURSEMENT -SEE BELOW$199
Paid to
Mcnew, Andrea$199
Total itemized disbursements $1,170,947
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 316 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
4 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $7,521 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
Largest vendors
Largest vendors
Name
Amount
Mothership Strategies16 payments · 24% of all spending
$308,812
Pivot Group, Inc.7 payments · 20% of all spending
$258,033
Bluebird Technolgies LLC6 payments · 6.4% of all spending
$82,155
Everyaction, Inc.8 payments · 3.8% of all spending
$49,018
Daily Consulting6 payments · 3.7% of all spending
$48,000
ActBlue Technical Services81 payments · 3.4% of all spending
$44,232
Gbao3 payments · 3.4% of all spending
$43,900
Premier Fiorello Consulting7 payments · 3% of all spending
$38,500
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.