Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (qualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: Democrats Win Fund Action
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00894881 · files monthly
1 priority from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
OUR MISSION ↗ (opens demswinfund.org at this heading)
As Congress enters an unprecedented period of time, Tony is going to deploy his expertise to help Democrats WIN in battleground races. We will help identify opportunities, fund competitive races, and help Democrats across the board get the resources to win.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · demswinfund.org
Heading as listed on demswinfund.org ↗ (opens demswinfund.org at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 119 | $263.2K · 68% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 7 | $23.5K · 6% |
| Other PACs and committees | 12 | $102.5K · 26% |
| All recipients | 138 | $389.2K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 38 | $97.5K |
| Texas | 11 | $34K |
| Arizona | 5 | $19.7K |
| New York | 10 | $18.5K |
| New Jersey | 6 | $14.5K |
| New Mexico | 3 | $13.5K |
| Florida | 7 | $10K |
| Michigan | 3 | $9K |
The largest 8 of 31 states.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 2 payments | $65K |
| House campaign committee · 5 payments | $11.7K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 3 payments | $10K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to LUJAN VICTORY FUND · 4 payments |
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 27,069 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $550.4K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $2,751,948
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 5,742 contributions · 22% | $121,792 |
| 1,747 contributions · 6.4% | $35,224 |
Total reported disbursements $2,617,043
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$2.6M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.2M, Jan 6 – Jun 25, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Democrats Win Fund is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). Its FEC record names Democrats Win Fund Action as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Democrats Win Fund is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
Bars drawn to $65K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
| $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to MEMBERS FOR COMMON GROUND · 3 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 4 payments | $8K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to PADILLA · 2 payments | $7.5K |
| House campaign committee · 3 payments | $7.5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BETTER BLUE FUND · 5 payments | $7K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to IMPOSSIBLE TO INEVITABLE · 2 payments | $6K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to CALIFORNIA HOUSE MAJORITY FUND · 3 payments | $6K |
$389.2K across 123 recipient committees, or 15% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| 1,549 contributions · 5.7% |
| $31,427 |
| 1,561 contributions · 5.1% | $28,231 |
| 1,354 contributions · 5% | $27,511 |
| 1,126 contributions · 3.5% | $19,201 |
| 668 contributions · 3.2% | $17,444 |
| 875 contributions · 3.1% | $17,298 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 23,342 contributions · 83% of ranked | $443,817 |
| Written instead of an employer · 798 contributions · 4.7% of ranked | $25,151 |
| 8 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $4,000 |
| 49 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $2,670 |
| 2 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $2,000 |
| 17 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $1,700 |
| 16 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $1,600 |
| 16 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $1,600 |
A further $17,532 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,192,087) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 22,802 contributions · 81% of ranked | $430,852 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 540 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $12,915 |
| 249 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $7,843 |
| 17 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $4,460 |
| 74 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $4,023 |
| 87 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $3,897 |
| 54 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $3,185 |
| 49 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $2,670 |
A further $17,532 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,192,087) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $2,568,401
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 512 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 63 payments · 61% of all spending | $1,592,019 |
| 38 payments · 6% of all spending | $157,603 |
| 107 payments · 4.1% of all spending | $107,280 |
| 12 payments · 3.7% of all spending | $97,496 |
| 20 payments · 3.6% of all spending | $95,387 |
| 28 payments · 3.5% of all spending | $92,354 |
| 2 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $65,000 |
| 10 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $34,032 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.