Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › TX-15 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, TX-15
Has not served in Congress
6 priorities from bobbypulidofortexas.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
In the Valley and across South Texas, the economy we care about is not a bunch of numbers and letters flashing on a board on Wall Street. It’s in our pockets, at the pump, in the grocery store when we buy fajitas, milk and eggs – and for some it’s when they have to choose between paying the rent or for their health insurance.
People down here don’t expect handouts, but they do expect and deserve a fair shot. I will stand up to the big greedy corporations that have been raising prices on Americans who are already struggling to pay for basic necessities.
I will also focus on cutting the red tape that strangles small businesses because down here the heart of our economy is driven by small local businesses, working families and entrepreneurs.
I think it’s about time we reward their hard work, invest in skills and apprenticeships, and support the creation of higher-wage jobs that keep our talent right here at home building the South Texas economy.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobbypulidofortexas.com/issues
America’s strength starts with the land and the people who work it. Our farmers and ranchers don’t want handouts, but they do need fair markets, fair and open trade, and the freedom to do what they do best.
Tariffs and trade wars are driving up costs and closing off opportunities, leaving too many of our families struggling to keep up.
I believe in strong, commonsense agricultural policy that protects our natural resources, supports rural families, and keeps safe, affordable, American-grown food on every table. Protecting farmers and ranchers is good economics, but it’s also a matter of national security.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobbypulidofortexas.com/issues
Our goal as a country should be to have a secure border – a policy that should not change based on what president or party is in charge – and we have to go after the violent criminals that are here illegally and get them out of our country.
The problem is that when it comes to the immigration debate, for a long time now, it’s been happening among a bunch of politicians in Washington who don’t want to solve the problem and don’t care about what people like us down here in South Texas think.
I believe we can secure the border without destroying families and our local economy in the process. We can more effectively attack the flow of fentanyl and other cartel driven drug supply lines into our country.
We can and should have more vetting hubs in Central America to help bring order to migration as we create a more fair and reasonable path to legalization for those who want to come here to contribute – because American businesses need a reliable workforce.
The bottom line is, we need an immigration system that’s tough but fair, and works for the Valley and South Texas as much as it works for the rest of America.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobbypulidofortexas.com/issues
The truth is that today, healthcare costs are crushing families and in rural areas all across the country hospitals are in danger of having to close their doors. We have to rethink how we provide actually affordable healthcare to more people.
For starters, I believe that, like Social Security, Medicare is a promise and a critical safety net that we have to keep and make stronger. We also need real leadership not more political rhetoric if we are ever going to succeed in bringing down costs by negotiating better returns for what we spend on healthcare and prescription drugs.
Here’s another truth – our current representative took orders from her party leaders and voted for a so-called “big beautiful bill” that put Medicaid and South Texas seniors at risk.
I will never vote against South Texas families just because my party or anyone else tells me to. I know that I will not always have all the right answers, but I’ll always have your back.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobbypulidofortexas.com/issues
I believe strong public schools are critical to the success of South Texas. That’s why I oppose voucher schemes that drain money from our classrooms and send it to private schools.
Parents should know their kids are getting a fair shot at success no matter their zip code and that starts with doing right by our teachers and the school system that supports them.
That’s why I will focus on making sure teachers get paid better for educating our sons and daughters, on reducing classroom overcrowding, and investing in skills training so every student is prepared to do the jobs of tomorrow or to create the businesses that will take our South Texas economy into the future.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobbypulidofortexas.com/issues
The Valley has been dealing with a growing water crisis. Without action, there’s no farming, no jobs, no future. We need to fight for bold investments in desalination, modern irrigation and infrastructure to secure the water we need for decades to come.
I’ll fight to hold Mexico accountable for water treaty obligations and build a regional strategy that prioritizes South Texas families and farmers. If we can’t secure our water, we can’t secure the Valley’s future.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bobbypulidofortexas.com/issues
FEC filings, Jul 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00919985
81¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 7 reports ($5.5M of $6.8M). Cash on hand went from $274.3K on Sep 30, 2025 to $1.3M on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $306,804 | $32,469 | $274,335 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $415,452 | $401,701 | $288,087 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Feb 11, 2026 | $322,488 | $327,273 | $283,302 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $575,560 | $455,869 | $402,994 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $1,340,157 | $587,214 | $1,155,936 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $3,252,907 | $3,035,131 | $1,373,712 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $605,878 | $710,136 | $1,269,454 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
No endorsements page
Advanced · 36,957 votes (68%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Latest poll · Barbara Jordan Public Policy Research and Survey Center, Oct 16, 2026 · too few nonpartisan polls for a lead
A poll is a snapshot, not a forecast.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 1,912 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $2M.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 3 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 7 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $201.1K.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 172 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $386K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $6,819,247
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
44% of the money placed by state came from inside Texas: $907.9K of $2M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,005 contributions · 44% | $907,949 |
| 313 contributions · 18% | $376,156 |
| 116 contributions · 12% | $239,760 |
| 84 contributions · 5.7% | $116,459 |
| 64 contributions · 3.1% | $63,329 |
| 58 contributions · 2.8% | $57,214 |
| 18 contributions · 1.8% | $37,260 |
| 10 contributions · 1.4% | $28,850 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 41 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 836 contributions · 38% of ranked | $684,953 |
| Written instead of an employer · 212 contributions · 22% of ranked | $400,214 |
| 4 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 4 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $12,722 |
| 5 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $11,138 |
| 3 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 3 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 5 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $9,857 |
A further $72,849 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,244,897) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $72,790 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $2,452,714
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 756 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
3 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $2,535 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 9 payments · 13% of all spending | $707,875 |
| 59 payments · 5.8% of all spending | $323,260 |
| 19 payments · 3% of all spending | $166,433 |
| 14 payments · 2% of all spending | $113,414 |
| 5 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $100,741 |
| 3 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $87,326 |
| 11 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $67,300 |
| 56 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $65,798 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 754 contributions · 29% of ranked | $563,537 |
| 5 contributions · 7.7% of ranked | $150,750 |
| 144 contributions · 7.2% of ranked | $140,139 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 78 contributions · 6% of ranked | $117,166 |
| 33 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $53,130 |
| 37 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $45,639 |
| 23 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $43,050 |
| 33 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $40,250 |
A further $69,349 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,244,897) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.