Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (qualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: LET America Vote PAC
Website slogan: "Democrats fighting for reform" (Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00573261 · files monthly
“Fixing our democracy by getting big money out of politics and protecting the right to vote. We're working to end our rigged political system by electing reform champions, passing meaningful legislative reforms, and elevating these issues in the national conversation.
For 10 years, End Citizens United has been a leading voice for meaningful campaign finance reform. We're proud to work in partnership with real democracy champions to overturn Citizens United, end unlimited and undisclosed money in politics, and protect and expand the right to vote.”
End Citizens United, on its own site, endcitizensunited.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 150 | $482K · 55% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 9 | $20K · 2.3% |
| Democratic party committees | 1 | $5K · 0.6% |
| Other party committees | 3 | $255K · 29% |
| Other PACs and committees | 21 | $111.5K · 13% |
| All recipients | 184 | $873.5K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 18 | $51.5K |
| New York | 14 | $48K |
| Pennsylvania | 8 | $42.5K |
| Ohio | 9 | $26K |
| Colorado | 6 | $23K |
| Michigan | 7 | $22K |
| Illinois | 7 | $19.5K |
| Georgia | 4 | $19K |
The largest 8 of 35 states.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 125,645 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $3M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 3 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports. Here they come to $2.3M, more than the $7.8K this committee's own reports show on the line.
Total reported receipts $23,144,510
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 20,416 contributions · 18% | $530,282 |
| 8,933 contributions · 6.9% | $203,977 |
Total reported disbursements $23,326,699
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $566,693 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$23.3M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.4M, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Website slogan: "Democrats fighting for reform" Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
End Citizens United is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $140K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to END CITIZENS UNITED · 32 payments | $4M |
| PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to END CITIZENS UNITED · 28 payments | $2.3M |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NIKEMA WILLIAMS HOUSE VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $7K |
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to BLUE TO THE FUTURE 2024 · 1 payment | $2.8K |
$6.3M from 4 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to END CITIZENS UNITED · 1 payment | $150K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 8 payments | $140K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 4 payments | $105K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to END CITIZENS UNITED · 1 payment | $75K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to CHRIS PAPPAS VICTORY FUND · 4 payments | $10K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $10K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
$1.1M across 156 recipient committees, or 4.7% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown. A further $94.5K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| 7,607 contributions · 5.6% | $167,085 |
| 6,546 contributions · 4.8% | $142,808 |
| 4,927 contributions · 4.6% | $135,687 |
| 5,370 contributions · 4.4% | $130,954 |
| 4,495 contributions · 3.3% | $98,840 |
| 4,375 contributions · 3.1% | $92,778 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 6,149 contributions · 34% of ranked | $203,343 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1,527 contributions · 9% of ranked | $53,685 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1,294 contributions · 7% of ranked | $41,521 |
| 8 contributions · 6.7% of ranked | $40,000 |
| 10 contributions · 1% of ranked | $6,050 |
| 2 contributions · 1% of ranked | $6,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1% of ranked | $6,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $5,500 |
A further $2,185,252 came from donors whose answer names no employer (Declined, N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($8,867,260) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 95,524 contributions · 74% of ranked | $1,929,308 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 3,580 contributions · 4.4% of ranked | $113,516 |
| 464 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $58,146 |
| 920 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $39,685 |
| 996 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $30,955 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 482 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $13,856 |
| 347 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $13,447 |
| 246 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $12,780 |
A further $222,571 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($8,867,260) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
Total itemized disbursements $22,530,176
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 5,130 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
267 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $5,616,417 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 82 payments · 36% of all spending | $8,450,071 |
| 60 payments · 24% of all spending | $5,678,824 |
| 33 payments · 4.4% of all spending | $1,020,250 |
| 22 payments · 4.1% of all spending | $953,640 |
| 124 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $572,468 |
| 473 payments · 1.9% of all spending | $446,677 |
| 21 payments · 1.7% of all spending | $402,798 |
| 19 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $384,352 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to BATTLEGROUND BLUE PAC · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to CHRIS DELUZIO VICTORY FUND · 4 payments | $10K |