Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › WI-01 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, WI-01
Representative since 2019
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
3 priorities from bryansteil.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Families and workers haven’t been able to afford the things they need. Steil is working to lower costs by cutting wasteful government spending, unleashing American energy, and reducing regulatory costs.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bryansteil.com
Costs are too high. Reckless spending has caused prices for everyday goods and services to skyrocket. Bryan Steil is leading efforts to cut wasteful spending and lower costs for Wisconsin workers and families.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bryansteil.com/issues
Heading as listed on bryansteil.com ↗ (opens bryansteil.com at this heading)
We must continue working to secure our border. Steil has worked to stop the open border policies that allowed the flow of illicit drugs, like deadly fentanyl, into our country. He’s collaborating with local law enforcement to ensure our communities are safe and secure.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bryansteil.com
We must secure our border. Steil is working to secure the border by supporting policies to stop the flow of illicit fentanyl and end the human trafficking crisis. Steil will always work with law enforcement to ensure our communities are safe and secure.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bryansteil.com/issues
Heading as listed on bryansteil.com ↗ (opens bryansteil.com at this heading)
Steil strongly supports Social Security and Medicare. He is committed to protecting these vital programs for older Americans and those who rely on them.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bryansteil.com
Steil has always worked to protect our seniors and the programs they rely on. Steil is committed to protecting Social Security and Medicare. He supports policies to ensure these programs are solvent for generations to come. He’s also working to lower prescription drug prices which have become unaffordable for many seniors.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · bryansteil.com/issues
Heading as listed on bryansteil.com ↗ (opens bryansteil.com at this heading)
99% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 9 times in the 119th Congress.
Joint Committee on Printing Vice Chair
House Committee on Financial Services
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Steil’s 59 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00677286
100¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($6.4M of $6.4M). Cash on hand went from $2.8M on Mar 31, 2025 to $2.2M on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $668,895 | $137,794 | $2,750,271 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $1,165,350 | $255,618 | $3,660,002 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $756,150 | $182,440 | $4,233,713 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $852,751 | $184,015 | $4,902,449 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $933,219 | $271,540 | $5,564,127 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $925,924 | $312,637 | $6,177,414 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 22, 2026 | $165,488 | $15,804 | $6,327,099 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $783,582 | $2,907,508 | $4,203,173 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $142,194 | $2,101,763 | $2,243,605 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 6 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 63 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $2.2M.
No endorsements page
Advanced · 0 votes (0%) · 1 of 1 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 802 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.9M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 3,510 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.2M.
Total reported receipts $6,393,553
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
37% of the money placed by state came from inside Wisconsin: $453.6K of $1.2M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,488 contributions · 37% | $453,594 |
| 337 contributions · 12% | $148,734 |
| 58 contributions · 8.9% | $108,757 |
| 131 contributions · 5.2% | $63,610 |
| 334 contributions · 5.1% | $62,890 |
| 316 contributions · 4.8% | $58,527 |
| 51 contributions · 4.6% | $56,535 |
| 74 contributions · 3.8% | $46,795 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 42 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 2,204 contributions · 27% of ranked | $301,736 |
| Written instead of an employer · 134 contributions · 7.5% of ranked | $82,977 |
| 10 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $31,500 |
| 11 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $27,705 |
| 10 contributions · 2% of ranked | $22,369 |
| 7 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $21,000 |
| 9 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $19,393 |
| 5 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $14,000 |
A further $24,082 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($333,587) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $42,081 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $3,433,476
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,451 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
38 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $155,478 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4 payments · 30% of all spending | $1,901,140 |
| 19 payments · 5.7% of all spending | $366,109 |
| 9 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $176,323 |
| 12 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $153,423 |
| 15 payments · 2% of all spending | $130,293 |
| 16 payments · 1.9% of all spending | $122,384 |
| 8 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $80,895 |
| 26 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $71,810 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 2,205 contributions · 25% of ranked | $301,745 |
| 52 contributions · 7.8% of ranked | $92,641 |
| 42 contributions · 4.2% of ranked | $50,203 |
| 42 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $44,700 |
| 15 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $40,541 |
| 19 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $37,201 |
| 14 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $36,537 |
| 21 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $31,452 |
A further $24,082 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($333,587) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.