Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (qualified)Lobbyist/registrant PACCorporation without capital stockNew York, New YorkActive
Connected organization: New York Life Insurance Co.
Political fund of New York Life Insurance Company
New York Life Insurance Company (NYLIC), most commonly known as New York Life, is the second-largest life insurance company and the largest mutual life insurance company in the United States, and is ranked #69 on the 2025 Fortune 500 list of the largest U.S. corporations by total revenue. In 2025, NYLIC achieved the best possible ratings by the four independent rating companies (Standard & Poor's, AM Best, Moody's and Fitch Ratings). Other New York Life affiliates provide an array of securities products and services, as well as institutional and retail mutual funds. (Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00158881 · files monthly
“Our mission is to provide financial security and peace of mind through trusted products and services. Guided by our long-term perspective and core values—humanity, integrity, and financial strength—we’re committed to supporting the wellbeing of the people, markets, and environments where we live and work.”
New York Life Insurance Company, the organization this committee is the political fund of, newyorklife.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
1 priority from the site of New York Life Insurance Company, the organization this committee is the political fund of, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
New York Life has long supported programs related to environmental sustainability in the workplace.
Addressing environmental challenges through the measures listed below along with other best practices allows the Company to drive sustainable growth into the future, find operational efficiencies and build resiliency for our business, other stakeholders and our policy owners.
In that regard, we aspire to:
- Reduce our Environmental Impact: Reduce the direct and indirect impact of our operations on the environment by pursuing improvements in energy consumption, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, water consumption, waste production, and natural resource use. This includes:
- Implementing initiatives to reduce New York Life’s Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions and achieving our operational emissions reduction target of 30% reduction by 2030, from a 2019 baseline;
- Conserving energy consumption through effective energy management initiatives;
- Decreasing dependency on natural resources by reducing consumption of energy, plastics, paper, water, and other materials;
- Prioritizing healthy and efficient office spaces;
- Reducing the amount of waste produced, increasing the amount of reuse and recycling, and encouraging employees to repurpose resources, where possible; and
- Replacing corporate business travel with the use of collaboration tools, where possible.
- Sustainable Procurement: Engage third-party service providers on the management of their material sustainability risks, giving us visibility into the risks and opportunities across our supply chain. To facilitate these engagements and access verified data, we leverage a third party to assess supplier practices and inform our third-party risk management. This ongoing engagement supports business continuity and reinforces New York Life's commitment to a reliable, well-managed supply chain.
- Performance Measurement: Drive continuous improvement in the environmental performance of our facilities by measuring and monitoring key performance indicators, including energy consumption; electricity use; water consumption; waste diversion; renewable energy; and Scope 1, 2, and 3 GHG emissions.
- Learning and Development: Provide learning and engagement opportunities for all employees to enhance awareness on sustainability issues and ways to reduce environmental impact at the office, at home, and in the community.
- Stakeholder Engagement: Engage customers, employees, agents, institutional investors, and the communities we serve on New York Life’s corporate responsibility priorities through annual corporate responsibility reports, press releases, and other communications.
- Review New York Life’s sustainability priorities on an annual basis to ensure that they remain current and appropriate for our business.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · newyorklife.com/about/privacy/environmental-sustainability-policy-statement
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 88 | $619,500 | $0 | $619,500 | 47% |
| Republican | 83 | $617,000 | $0 | $617,000 | 47% |
| Other or unresolved | 19 | $70,500 | $0 | $70,500 | 5.4% |
| Shown support | 190 | $1,307,000 | $0 | $1,307,000 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 88 | $619.5K · 27% |
| Republican candidates | 81 | $600K · 26% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 21 | $87.5K · 3.8% |
| Other party committees | 4 | $330K · 14% |
| Other PACs and committees | 94 | $691.5K · 30% |
| All recipients | 288 | $2.3M |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 22 | $160.5K |
| New York | 18 | $138.5K |
| Pennsylvania | 10 | $75K |
| Florida | 10 | $65.5K |
| New Jersey | 7 | $55K |
| Texas | 9 | $55K |
| Illinois | 6 | $47.5K |
| Michigan | 5 | $47.5K |
The largest 8 of 48 states.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 14,356 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.4M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Total reported receipts $2,062,753
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,950 contributions · 13% | $193,688 |
| 1,581 contributions · 11% | $160,665 |
Total reported disbursements $2,525,244
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Total itemized disbursements $2,347,545
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 668 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name |
|---|
$2.5M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $341K, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Besides giving through its PAC, New York Life Insurance Company pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
The organization’s own reports give its total lobbying costs, including any firms it hired; each firm reports what this client paid it.
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $354.8K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings. $17K is honorary, presidential-library and event money disclosed only here.
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY”, found by searching “NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Oct 27, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
New York Life Insurance Company (NYLIC), most commonly known as New York Life, is the second-largest life insurance company and the largest mutual life insurance company in the United States, and is ranked #69 on the 2025 Fortune 500 list of the largest U.S. corporations by total revenue. In 2025, NYLIC achieved the best possible ratings by the four independent rating companies (Standard & Poor's, AM Best, Moody's and Fitch Ratings). Other New York Life affiliates provide an array of securities products and services, as well as institutional and retail mutual funds. Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
New York Life Insurance Co. PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $135K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 5 payments | $135K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 5 payments | $135K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to COLE COMBINED COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $30K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to TEAM HILL · 4 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to ELECT DIVERSE DEMOCRATS PAC · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to INVESTMENT COMPANY INSTITUTE · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL ADVISORS · 2 payments | $10K |
$2.3M across 292 recipient committees, or 92% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown. A further $3.5K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| 1,115 contributions · 8% |
| $114,634 |
| 849 contributions · 7.8% | $112,297 |
| 924 contributions · 5.9% | $85,452 |
| 568 contributions · 5.4% | $77,333 |
| 579 contributions · 4.6% | $66,823 |
| 561 contributions · 3.5% | $50,909 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 14,351 contributions · 100% of ranked | $1,436,693 |
A further $2,503 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($539,713) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 11,221 contributions · 76% of ranked | $1,098,910 |
| 967 contributions · 10% of ranked | $146,967 |
| 219 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $30,913 |
| 448 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $18,866 |
| 218 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $18,110 |
| 333 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $17,299 |
| 63 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $17,279 |
| 65 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $13,130 |
A further $2,503 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($539,713) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Amount |
|---|
| 5 payments · 5.3% of all spending | $135,000 |
| 5 payments · 5.3% of all spending | $135,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $19,045 |
| 4 payments · 0.4% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.4% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.4% of all spending | $10,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.