Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00365536 · files monthly
“BOLD PAC is the campaign arm of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus (CHC) and is dedicated to increasing diversity in the House and Senate by getting more Latinos and Latinas elected. In 2022, BOLD PAC elected the largest Democratic CHC in history, bringing nine new Latinos to the House, including four in seats that were picked up by House Democrats. This was the result of over $6 Million in direct investments for Latino candidates, the largest sum in the organization’s history. Additionally, BOLD PAC played an integral role in protecting the Democratic majority in the Senate by helping re-elect Senator Catherine Cortez Masto, the first and only Latina in the Senate.”
CHC Bold PAC, on its own site, boldpac.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
No published list of positions
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 56 | $315,000 | $1,027,336 | $1,342,336 | 81% |
| Other or unresolved | 2 | $5,000 | $300,046 | $305,046 | 19% |
| Shown support | 58 | $320,000 | $1,327,382 | $1,647,382 | 100% |
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 90 | $409.5K · 28% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 2 | $6K · 0.4% |
| Other party committees | 1 | $7.6K · 0.5% |
| Other PACs and committees | 7 | $1M · 71% |
| All recipients | 100 | $1.5M |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 29 | $160K |
| Texas | 9 | $43.5K |
| New Jersey | 5 | $35K |
| Florida | 7 | $28K |
| New Mexico | 4 | $25K |
| Arizona | 4 | $22K |
| Oregon | 2 | $12K |
| Nebraska | 1 | $10K |
The largest 8 of 26 states.
The 8 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 82,434 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $2.1M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Each as the committee named it on this line.
Total reported receipts $12,786,104
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 15,892 contributions · 19% | $402,101 |
| 64 contributions · 7.5% | $157,383 |
Total reported disbursements $12,864,015
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $4,034,673 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$12.9M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $2.9M, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending. The line stops at the latest report, through Oct 14, 2026, at the dashed rule; elections after it are marked where they fall.
No lobbying disclosures matched
CHC Bold PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). Its FEC record names Elect Diverse Democrats PAC as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
CHC Bold PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $700K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to CHC BOLD PAC · 1 payment | $1M |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to CHC BOLD PAC · 2 payments | $900K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to CHC BOLD PAC · 1 payment | $400K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to CHC BOLD PAC · 1 payment | $300K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to INT'L UNION OF BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION (ABA) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION · 2 payments | $10K |
$5.1M from 337 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to DEMOCRATS 2024 · 4 payments | $700K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $315K |
| House campaign committee · 3 payments | $15K |
| House campaign committee · 3 payments | $15K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to SEEC VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to JFW CHALLENGERS · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments |
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| 6,590 contributions · 7% | $147,333 |
| 558 contributions · 5.2% | $109,272 |
| 4,726 contributions · 5% | $104,470 |
| 2,397 contributions · 3.8% | $80,730 |
| 3,243 contributions · 3.7% | $77,259 |
| 3,766 contributions · 3.6% | $75,819 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 2,832 contributions · 14% of ranked | $78,928 |
| 6 contributions · 5.2% of ranked | $30,000 |
| 24 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 3 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $10,400 |
| 2 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 5 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $10,000 |
A further $1,428,613 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,456,487) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 64,494 contributions · 64% of ranked | $1,253,246 |
| 475 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $71,183 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 2,165 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $63,763 |
| 30 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $63,660 |
| 122 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $24,825 |
| 110 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $22,248 |
| 17 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $22,159 |
| 521 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $22,113 |
A further $110,446 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($4,456,487) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
Total itemized disbursements $8,574,628
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 2,107 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
136 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $934,994 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 71 payments · 19% of all spending | $2,492,502 |
| 196 payments · 6% of all spending | $767,898 |
| 4 payments · 5.4% of all spending | $700,000 |
| 24 payments · 3% of all spending | $382,090 |
| 21 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $340,701 |
| 1 payment · 2.4% of all spending | $315,000 |
| 20 payments · 2.2% of all spending | $277,884 |
| 112 payments · 1.9% of all spending | $249,428 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to LICCARDO VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to CALIFORNIA HOUSE MAJORITY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NEW POLITICS NEXT MISSION FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 2 payments | $10K |
$1.5M across 88 recipient committees, or 11% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.