Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › TX-28 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, TX-28
Has not served in Congress
7 priorities from tanoforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
South Texas lives the reality of the border every single day — this isn’t a talking point, it’s our home.
Tano Tijerina believes we must secure the border, enforce the law, and restore order to a broken system. That means stopping illegal crossings, supporting law enforcement, and ensuring immigration happens legally and responsibly.
At the same time, Tano understands that immigration reform must be practical and bipartisan. Many South Texas families came here the right way — and they deserve a system that respects that process.
Washington has failed on this issue for decades. Tano will bring real-world experience and fight for solutions that actually work.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tanoforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on tanoforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens tanoforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Tano believes government should work for the people not the other way around.
As Webb County Judge, he lowered property taxes five times in ten years while still delivering results. He knows how to manage taxpayer dollars responsibly and get more done with less.
In Congress, Tano will fight to: ↗ (opens tanoforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
- Lower taxes for working families and small businesses
- Cut burdensome federal regulations
- Stop wasteful spending and bring fiscal responsibility back to Washington
It’s simple, families should keep more of what they earn.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tanoforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on tanoforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens tanoforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
For too long, Washington has been focused on politics instead of people.
Tano believes leadership means representing everyone — not just one party. As County Judge, he worked for Republicans, Democrats, and independents alike, and he’ll bring that same mindset to Congress.
This campaign is about South Texas not political games.
Tano will always put the people of TX-28 first.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tanoforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on tanoforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens tanoforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Washington is broken because it’s out of touch.
Tano believes we need to bring Texas values to D.C: accountability, hard work, faith, and common sense.
That means: ↗ (opens tanoforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
- Less bureaucracy, more action
- More accountability, less politics
- Leadership that delivers results — not excuses
Tano isn’t going to Washington to become part of the system — he’s going to fix it.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tanoforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on tanoforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens tanoforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Tano supports innovation and believes America should lead the world in emerging technologies like cryptocurrency.
He will fight for: ↗ (opens tanoforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
- Clear, fair regulations that encourage growth
- Protecting financial freedom and privacy
- Keeping innovation in the United States — not pushing it overseas
Crypto represents opportunity — and South Texas should be part of that future.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tanoforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on tanoforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens tanoforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
South Texas has the potential to become a major hub for innovation and job creation.
Laredo is one of the top three inland ports in America; a critical gateway for trade and commerce. With the right leadership, we can build on that strength and turn South Texas into a center for technology, logistics, and economic growth.
But innovation should never come at the cost of our water, our land, or our rural way of life. As the technology boom brings a wave of data centers across Texas, Tano knows these projects can drain scarce water, consume massive amounts of power, and swallow up the land our rural communities depend on.
Real leadership means getting all the facts first and putting South Texas families ahead of outside interests. As Webb County Judge, Tano has stood up to protect our land and water, insisting that any project prove it will strengthen our communities, not strain them. He will bring that same fight to Congress: we can lead in technology and still refuse to trade away the water, land, and affordable power our children will inherit.
Tano will fight to: ↗ (opens tanoforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
- Attract new industries and high-paying jobs that put South Texans first
- Invest in infrastructure and workforce development so our people fill these jobs
- Position South Texas as a leader in AI, tech, and logistics
- Protect our water, land, and rural communities from data centers and developments that take more than they give
- Stand with ratepayers so families and small businesses aren't stuck paying for big tech's power demands
- Demand transparency and the full facts before any project moves forward
The future is being built now and South Texas should lead it, on our terms.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tanoforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on tanoforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens tanoforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
Tano believes in an America First foreign policy rooted in strength, security, and common sense.
That means: ↗ (opens tanoforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
- Standing with our allies, including Israel
- Confronting hostile regimes that threaten American security
- Securing our borders and protecting critical infrastructure, including our ports
Peace is achieved through strength — and weakness invites danger.
Tano will support policies that keep America safe while protecting our interests at home and abroad.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · tanoforcongress.com/issues
Heading as listed on tanoforcongress.com/issues ↗ (opens tanoforcongress.com/issues at this heading)
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00929174
93¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 6 reports ($1.6M of $1.7M). Cash on hand went from $116.9K on Dec 31, 2025 to $113.1K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $212,082 | $95,167 | $116,915 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Feb 11, 2026 | $91,002 | $139,386 | $68,532 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $509,427 | $4,304 | $573,654 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $462,660 | $271,149 | $765,166 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $378,917 | $932,875 | $211,207 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $83,609 | $181,766 | $113,050 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 5 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 14 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $452.4K.
6 endorsers listed on Tano Tijerina’s own campaign site.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
President
U.S. Senator
Speaker of the House
Majority Leader
Majority Whip
Governor
Advanced · 12,514 votes (74%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Latest poll · Barbara Jordan Public Policy Research and Survey Center, Aug 22, 2026 · too few nonpartisan polls for a lead
A poll is a snapshot, not a forecast.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 4,026 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $461.8K.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 98 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $266.8K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $1,862,407
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
83% of the money placed by state came from inside Texas: $383.7K of $461.8K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 954 contributions · 83% | $383,652 |
| 341 contributions · 3% | $13,639 |
| 81 contributions · 1.7% | $8,006 |
| 552 contributions · 1.4% | $6,473 |
| 193 contributions · 1.3% | $6,213 |
| 134 contributions · 0.9% | $4,348 |
| 254 contributions · 0.9% | $4,254 |
| 122 contributions · 0.9% | $4,184 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 42 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 3,528 contributions · 29% of ranked | $101,085 |
| Written instead of an employer · 105 contributions · 12% of ranked | $42,785 |
| 3 contributions · 4.1% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 2 contributions · 4.1% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.5% of ranked | $5,205 |
| 1 contribution · 1.5% of ranked | $5,205 |
A further $117,567 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($191,344) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Total itemized disbursements $691,772
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 351 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
2 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $3,796 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 15 payments · 6.8% of all spending | $118,857 |
| 10 payments · 6.5% of all spending | $114,201 |
| 2 payments · 3.2% of all spending | $56,270 |
| 4 payments · 2.9% of all spending | $50,714 |
| 7 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $44,500 |
| 4 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $44,474 |
| 1 payment · 2.5% of all spending | $44,005 |
| 1 payment · 2.4% of all spending | $41,765 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 3,528 contributions · 29% of ranked | $101,085 |
| 4 contributions · 5.6% of ranked | $19,082 |
| 7 contributions · 5% of ranked | $17,041 |
| 7 contributions · 4.6% of ranked | $15,705 |
| 3 contributions · 4.1% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 6 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $12,213 |
| 32 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $11,391 |
| 8 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $9,064 |
A further $118,188 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($191,344) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.