Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › NY-02 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, NY-02
Representative since 2021
5 priorities from garbarinoforny.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Long Island families and small businesses deserve an economy that rewards hard work, encourages investment, and creates opportunity.
As a third-generation small business owner, I understand the challenges facing employers, entrepreneurs, and working families. That’s why I have fought to lower taxes, reduce unnecessary regulations, and create an environment where businesses can grow and create jobs.
I helped secure an increase in the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction from $10,000 to $40,000 and fought to preserve the Pass-Through Entity Tax (PTET) deduction, providing meaningful tax relief for Long Island families and small businesses.
As Vice Chairman of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets, I helped advance the INVEST Act to expand access to capital for small businesses and the bipartisan 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act to increase housing supply and improve affordability.
I will continue fighting to strengthen Long Island’s economy, support small businesses, create good-paying jobs, and expand opportunities for New York families.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · garbarinoforny.com/issues/economy-jobs
Heading as listed on garbarinoforny.com/issues ↗ (opens garbarinoforny.com/issues at this heading)
Long Island is home to more than 800,000 veterans, and I believe we have a solemn obligation to ensure they receive the care, benefits, and support they have earned.
Supporting our veterans has been one of my top priorities since taking office. I established my Veterans Advisory Council to ensure Long Island veterans have a direct voice in my work, and I have championed legislation to improve health care, expand earned benefits, strengthen mental health services, and support Veteran Service Organizations through my VSO Support Act.
I was proud to support bipartisan legislation including the PAWS for Veterans Therapy Act and the Dr. Lorna Breen Health Care Provider Protection Act, while also helping secure permanent funding for the World Trade Center Health Program and fighting to protect access to care at the Northport VA Medical Center.
Our veterans fulfilled their promise to America. I will always fight to fulfill our promise to them.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · garbarinoforny.com/issues/supporting-our-veterans
Heading as listed on garbarinoforny.com/issues ↗ (opens garbarinoforny.com/issues at this heading)
Keeping Long Island families safe has always been one of my top priorities. I believe we must stand with the brave men and women in law enforcement, give them the tools they need to do their jobs, and ensure our communities remain safe.
I have consistently opposed efforts to defund the police and have fought to strengthen law enforcement at every level. I introduced the POLICE Act, which makes assaulting a law enforcement officer, firefighter, or other first responder a deportable offense. The bill passed the House and sends a clear message that attacks on those who protect our communities will not be tolerated.
As Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, I helped secure $140 million in federal funding for counterterrorism and emergency preparedness across New York, including $1.8 million for Nassau and Suffolk Counties. I continue working with local law enforcement and first responders to ensure they have the resources needed to combat crime, respond to emerging threats, and keep Long Island families safe.
I will always Back the Blue, support our first responders, and fight for policies that strengthen public safety and uphold the rule of law.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · garbarinoforny.com/issues/standing-with-law-enforcement
Heading as listed on garbarinoforny.com/issues ↗ (opens garbarinoforny.com/issues at this heading)
Securing our nation’s borders is essential to protecting our communities, combating transnational crime, and safeguarding our national security. I believe the federal government has a responsibility to enforce our immigration laws, stop the flow of fentanyl and other deadly drugs, and provide our law enforcement officers and Border Patrol agents with the resources they need to keep America safe.
As Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, I have made border security and combating transnational criminal organizations top priorities. I have worked to strengthen oversight of the Department of Homeland Security, secure our borders, and ensure our immigration system prioritizes public safety and national security.
I have visited the southern border, met directly with Border Patrol agents, and seen firsthand the challenges they face every day. Those conversations have reinforced my commitment to securing the border, stopping human trafficking, disrupting drug cartels, and preventing violent gangs from bringing crime into communities like Long Island.
I introduced the POLICE Act (H.R. 2494), which makes assaulting a law enforcement officer, firefighter, or other first responder a deportable offense. The legislation passed the House of Representatives and reinforces the principle that anyone who attacks the men and women who protect our communities should face serious consequences.
I have also advanced legislation to combat transnational criminal organizations, including the Tren de Aragua Border Security Threat Assessment Act, requiring the Department of Homeland Security to develop a comprehensive strategy to address the growing threat posed by violent criminal organizations operating across our borders.
Keeping Long Island safe means securing America’s borders. I will continue fighting to strengthen border security, support our law enforcement officers, stop the flow of fentanyl, and ensure dangerous criminals are kept out of our communities.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · garbarinoforny.com/issues/border-security
Heading as listed on garbarinoforny.com/issues ↗ (opens garbarinoforny.com/issues at this heading)
Long Island’s economy and quality of life depend on affordable, reliable energy and a healthy environment. I believe we can strengthen America’s energy security while protecting the natural resources that make Long Island such a special place to call home.
I support an all-of-the-above energy strategy that expands American energy production, strengthens our electric grid, and reduces our reliance on foreign adversaries. As Co-Chair of the bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus and a member of the Conservative Climate Caucus, I have worked to advance practical, market-driven solutions that encourage innovation, strengthen our economy, and protect our environment.
I also fought to preserve key clean energy tax incentives for technologies like nuclear power, hydropower, geothermal energy, and energy storage, helping ensure America remains competitive while maintaining a reliable energy supply.
Protecting Long Island’s environment remains one of my top priorities. I have secured millions of dollars for sewer infrastructure, coastal resiliency, flood mitigation, and water quality projects that protect the Great South Bay and communities throughout Nassau and Suffolk Counties.
I believe we can grow our economy, strengthen our energy independence, and preserve Long Island’s natural resources for future generations.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · garbarinoforny.com/issues/energy-environment
Heading as listed on garbarinoforny.com/issues ↗ (opens garbarinoforny.com/issues at this heading)
95% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 35 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Financial Services
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Garbarino’s 99 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00729954
72¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($2.9M of $4.1M). Cash on hand went from $1.8M on Mar 31, 2025 to $2.7M on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $391,395 | $174,265 | $1,762,736 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $451,521 | $175,160 | $2,039,097 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $430,429 | $487,512 | $1,982,014 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $633,944 | $259,496 | $2,356,462 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $581,364 | $231,414 | $2,706,412 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jun 3, 2026 | $316,842 | $201,293 | $2,821,960 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $707,522 | $70,568 | $3,458,915 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $474,816 | $615,663 | $3,318,068 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $69,836 | $700,973 | $2,686,930 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Not read yet
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 1,008 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $2.2M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 2 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 8 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $430.5K.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 572 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $482K.
Total reported receipts $4,057,667
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
39% of the money placed by state came from inside New York: $189.5K of $482K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 141 contributions · 39% | $189,497 |
| 40 contributions · 6.9% | $33,475 |
| 48 contributions · 6% | $28,700 |
| 31 contributions · 5% | $24,000 |
| 23 contributions · 3.7% | $18,070 |
| 46 contributions · 3.7% | $18,047 |
| 30 contributions · 3.7% | $18,000 |
| 12 contributions · 3.3% | $16,000 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 47 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 59 contributions · 7.6% of ranked | $31,077 |
| Written instead of an employer · 27 contributions · 6.7% of ranked | $27,520 |
| 6 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $13,632 |
| 13 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $11,500 |
| 3 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 4 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 4 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 3 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $8,875 |
A further $1,500 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($5,878) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
Total itemized disbursements $1,953,001
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 716 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
47 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $194,090 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 payment · 14% of all spending | $403,000 |
| 8 payments · 10% of all spending | $300,057 |
| 1 payment · 8.6% of all spending | $250,000 |
| 4 payments · 8.3% of all spending | $243,099 |
| 16 payments · 5.5% of all spending | $160,075 |
| 13 payments · 3.9% of all spending | $114,265 |
| 12 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $47,500 |
| 5 payments · 1.4% of all spending | $39,529 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 129 contributions · 14% of ranked | $65,500 |
| 26 contributions · 8.7% of ranked | $41,750 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 59 contributions · 6.5% of ranked | $31,077 |
| 18 contributions · 4.1% of ranked | $19,875 |
| 8 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $15,875 |
| 28 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $13,000 |
| 5 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $12,500 |
| 8 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $10,750 |
A further $1,500 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($5,878) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.