Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (qualified)Lobbyist/registrant PACTrade associationTysons, VirginiaActive
Connected organization: National Automobile Dealers Association
Political fund of National Automobile Dealers Association
The National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) is an American trade organization representing nearly 16,500 franchised new car and truck dealerships, both domestic and foreign. Established in 1917, the organization is based in Tysons Corner, Virginia. As the automotive retail industry's primary trade association, NADA monitors federal legislation and regulation affecting dealerships and publishes forecasts and reports about industry trends. American Truck Dealers, established in 1970, is a division of NADA representing nearly 1,800 heavy- and medium-duty truck dealerships throughout the United States. (Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00040998 · files monthly
“NADA is the voice of franchised new-car and -truck dealers in the U.S., and we passionately and effectively promote franchised dealer interests before Congress, the executive branch and federal agencies, and the federal courts.
Additionally, NADA is the dealer’s best advocate in dealer-manufacturer relations, addressing concerns with manufacturers and distributors.”
National Automobile Dealers Association, the organization this committee is the political fund of, nada.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
2 priorities from the site of National Automobile Dealers Association, the organization this committee is the political fund of, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
NADA is the voice of franchised new-car and -truck dealers in the U.S., and we passionately and effectively promote franchised dealer interests before the Congress, the executive branch and federal agencies, and the federal courts.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nada.org/index.php/nada/about-nada/government-advocacy
ATD is the voice of franchised new medium- and heavy-duty truck dealers in the U.S., and we passionately and effectively promote franchised dealer interests before the Congress, the executive branch and federal agencies, and the federal courts.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nada.org/index.php/nada/about-nada/government-advocacy
Heading as listed on nada.org/index.php/nadapac ↗ (opens nada.org/index.php/nadapac at this heading)
Enacted in 1917 to help pay for World War I, the Federal Excise Tax (FET) on heavy duty trucks is the highest tax Congress has imposed on any product.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nada.org/index.php/nada/about-nada/government-advocacy
The Federal Excise Tax (FET), first enacted in 1917 to help pay for World War I, is a 12% excise tax on the sale of most new heavy-duty trucks that remains to this day.
The tax depresses the sale of heavy-duty trucks–the vast majority of which are manufactured in America, and delays the purchase of safer and more fuel-efficient trucks.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nada.org/index.php/nada/issues/federal-excise-tax
Franchised new-car and -truck dealers are excited and ready to sell smarter, greener vehicles.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nada.org/index.php/nada/about-nada/government-advocacy
New cars and trucks on America’s roads are smarter than ever; from autonomous to electric to hydrogen-powered vehicles, dealers across the country are adapting to the new frontier of more advanced vehicles – all with one goal: To give consumers access to the vehicles they want.
Dealers are essential to mass market adoption of alternative-powered vehicles.
America’s new-car and -truck dealers are committed to selling consumers the vehicles that they want and need.
Franchised dealers adapt to consumer preferences.
The buzz around autonomous vehicles is palpable.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nada.org/index.php/nada/issues/vehicle-technologies
Enhancing the auto retail industry’s workforce.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nada.org/index.php/nada/about-nada/government-advocacy
High-paying, meaningful jobs at car and truck dealerships exist in every community in America.
New-vehicle franchised dealers are directly responsible for more than one million U.S. jobs.
NADA is committed to enhancing the auto retail workforce and recruiting the next generation of dealership employees.
Amplifying female employment inside dealerships.
Mitigating the shortage of technicians with education and scholarships.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · nada.org/index.php/nada/issues/workforce
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 200 | $1,378,500 | $0 | $1,378,500 | 71% |
| Democratic | 94 | $513,000 | $0 | $513,000 | 26% |
| Other or unresolved | 12 | $53,500 | $0 | $53,500 | 2.8% |
| Shown support | 306 | $1,945,000 | $0 | $1,945,000 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 95 | $523K · 16% |
| Republican candidates | 199 | $1.4M · 41% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 13 | $58.5K · 1.8% |
| Democratic party committees | 3 | $255K · 7.7% |
| Republican party committees | 3 | $360K · 11% |
| Other PACs and committees | 112 | $763K · 23% |
| All recipients | 425 | $3.3M |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Texas | 26 | $177.5K |
| Virginia | 13 | $117.5K |
| Georgia | 13 | $115K |
| Ohio | 11 | $105K |
| New York | 16 | $98K |
| Pennsylvania | 16 | $85K |
| Florida | 18 | $77.5K |
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 2,747 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $4.5M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 2 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $357.6K from 2 sources in all.
The largest of the committees is listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $5,176,634
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 148 contributions · 6.4% | $291,375 |
| 189 contributions · 6% | $273,500 |
Total reported disbursements $5,836,251
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
$5.8M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $602.2K, June 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
Published by the Commission against this committee’s own FEC ID. An audit is a periodic examination that reports findings; an administrative fine is a penalty for filing a specific report late or not at all. They are separate instruments and are not combined into a score here.
1978 cycleReport released Jan 27, 1981
Source: the Commission’s audit-case and administrative-fine records, joined on this committee’s FEC ID, imported Oct 26, 2026. Enforcement matters (MURs) are published only against respondent names, with no committee identifier, so they are not shown here rather than being matched by name.
Besides giving through its PAC, National Automobile Dealers Association pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
The organization’s own reports give its total lobbying costs, including any firms it hired; each firm reports what this client paid it.
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $13.5K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ASSOCIATION”, found by searching “NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ASSOCIATION”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Oct 27, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
The National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) is an American trade organization representing nearly 16,500 franchised new car and truck dealerships, both domestic and foreign. Established in 1917, the organization is based in Tysons Corner, Virginia. As the automotive retail industry's primary trade association, NADA monitors federal legislation and regulation affecting dealerships and publishes forecasts and reports about industry trends. American Truck Dealers, established in 1970, is a division of NADA representing nearly 1,800 heavy- and medium-duty truck dealerships throughout the United States. Linked public record: Wikipedia organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
National Automobile Dealers Association PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| California |
|---|
| 18 |
| $72.5K |
The largest 8 of 45 states.
Bars drawn to $135K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE INC. · 1 payment | $5K |
$5K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to COLE COMBINED COMMITTEE · 3 payments | $135K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 4 payments | $120K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 4 payments | $120K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 4 payments | $120K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEFEND OUR MAJORITY · 3 payments | $105K |
| 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to DEMOCRATIC GRASSROOTS VICTORY FUND · 1 payment | $15K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to ASHLEY HINSON VICTORY COMMITTEE · 3 payments | $15K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to TEAM MOORE JOINT FUNDRAISING COMMITTEE · 4 payments | $15K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to WALKINSHAW VICTORY FUND · 8 payments | $15K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to TEAM CELESTE · 4 payments | $15K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to CLAY FULLER VICTORY FUND · 3 payments | $15K |
$3.3M across 449 recipient committees, or 57% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown. A further $5K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| 146 contributions · 5.9% |
| $268,625 |
| 124 contributions · 5.8% | $261,750 |
| 132 contributions · 5.5% | $248,000 |
| 131 contributions · 4% | $181,375 |
| 62 contributions · 3.7% | $167,925 |
| 133 contributions · 3.5% | $160,825 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 29 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $21,250 |
| 17 contributions · 1.2% of ranked | $18,750 |
| 6 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $17,500 |
| 6 contributions · 1% of ranked | $15,000 |
| 10 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $14,375 |
| 7 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $13,000 |
| 5 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $12,500 |
| 5 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $12,500 |
A further $16,375 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($10,070) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 768 contributions · 28% of ranked | $1,248,055 |
| 509 contributions · 21% of ranked | $962,720 |
| 320 contributions · 12% of ranked | $542,225 |
| 258 contributions · 7.2% of ranked | $326,650 |
| 156 contributions · 7.2% of ranked | $324,000 |
| 97 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $167,475 |
| 83 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $139,475 |
| 15 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $39,500 |
A further $10,625 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($10,070) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $5,350,319
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 861 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 13 payments · 32% of all spending | $1,850,000 |
| 3 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $135,000 |
| 20 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $133,940 |
| 4 payments · 2.1% of all spending | $120,000 |
| 4 payments · 2.1% of all spending | $120,000 |
| 4 payments · 2.1% of all spending | $120,000 |
| 3 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $105,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $47,494 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.