Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › UT-03 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, UT-03
Representative since 2023
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
9 priorities from celesteforutah.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Congresswoman Maloy is working to lower costs and make life more affordable. She knows what it means to work for a paycheck and make ends meet. It has been one of her top priorities to slow inflation and make sure your paycheck stretches as far as possible.
Celeste recently passed legislation that delivered the largest tax cut in American history. This legislation increased take-home pay by $10,000 per year for the average family, eliminated taxes on tips and overtime, and cut taxes for 88 percent of seniors on Social Security.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · celesteforutah.com/issues
Heading as listed on celesteforutah.com/issues ↗ (opens celesteforutah.com/issues at this heading)
Celeste Maloy is committed to securing America’s border. She voted to fully fund President Trump’s border wall and provide funding and technology to our Border Patrol agents so they can stop the flow of drugs and human trafficking across our southern border.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · celesteforutah.com/issues
Heading as listed on celesteforutah.com/issues ↗ (opens celesteforutah.com/issues at this heading)
Celeste is a woman of faith and holds religious freedom near and dear to her heart. She knows that Utahns do, too. She will always fight for Utahn’s right to worship and practice their faith as they see fit.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · celesteforutah.com/issues
Heading as listed on celesteforutah.com/issues ↗ (opens celesteforutah.com/issues at this heading)
Utahns need financial stability. Runaway government spending fuels inflation and weakens our economy. Congresswoman Maloy has made fiscal responsibility a top priority. She has voted to reduce bureaucracy and eliminate wasteful spending, saving taxpayers $9 billion each year. On the House Appropriations Committee, she remains vigilant in eliminating wasteful spending.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · celesteforutah.com/issues
Heading as listed on celesteforutah.com/issues ↗ (opens celesteforutah.com/issues at this heading)
Celeste knows the 2nd Amendment is clear – the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. She will fight the gun grabbers in Washington DC and defend our constitutional rights.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · celesteforutah.com/issues
Heading as listed on celesteforutah.com/issues ↗ (opens celesteforutah.com/issues at this heading)
Celeste believes all human life is sacred and will stand up for the unborn and our pro-life values in Congress.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · celesteforutah.com/issues
Heading as listed on celesteforutah.com/issues ↗ (opens celesteforutah.com/issues at this heading)
Celeste has voted to undo burdensome regulations that have stifled domestic energy production and driven up costs. She voted to bolster U.S. energy production and affordability by expanding and protecting American refining capacity. She will continue fighting for American energy independence and affordability.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · celesteforutah.com/issues
Heading as listed on celesteforutah.com/issues ↗ (opens celesteforutah.com/issues at this heading)
Utahns should have more control over the resources they depend on to make a living. Celeste knows Federal bureaucrats in Washington DC don’t understand how to manage our lands and resources better than we do. In Congress, she has been fighting to make sure Utahns have more control over the land and resources they depend on to make a living because she knows no one cares more about protecting and preserving our lands and natural resources than the farmers and ranchers who live and work on them.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · celesteforutah.com/issues
Heading as listed on celesteforutah.com/issues ↗ (opens celesteforutah.com/issues at this heading)
Celeste is a strong supporter of our military and national defense. On the House Appropriations Committee, she has worked to pass funding that benefits our military and Hill Air Force Base while ensuring these dollars are spent responsibly. She will continue fighting to keep America strong and our service members properly equipped.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · celesteforutah.com/issues
Heading as listed on celesteforutah.com/issues ↗ (opens celesteforutah.com/issues at this heading)
96% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 24 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Appropriations
House Committee on Natural Resources
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Maloy’s 40 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00842765
85¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($1.4M of $1.7M). Cash on hand went from $189.7K on Mar 31, 2025 to $359.6K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $135,585 | $52,884 | $189,722 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $122,515 | $89,723 | $222,514 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $94,650 | $115,508 | $201,657 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $213,020 | $55,579 | $359,098 |
| PRE-CONVENTION 2026 through Apr 5, 2026 | $303,467 | $200,688 | $461,877 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jun 3, 2026 | $308,125 | $515,329 | $254,673 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $276,499 | $208,793 | $322,379 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $136,042 | $144,036 | $314,385 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $62,792 | $17,616 | $359,561 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
No endorsements page
Advanced · 66,582 votes (66%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Latest poll · Lighthouse Research, Sep 15, 2026 · too few nonpartisan polls for a lead
A poll is a snapshot, not a forecast.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 359 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $779.1K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 451 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $690.4K.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 2 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 14 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $53.3K.
Total reported receipts $1,652,695
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
43% of the money placed by state came from inside Utah: $296.9K of $686.6K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 217 contributions · 43% | $296,930 |
| 48 contributions · 17% | $114,925 |
| 61 contributions · 8.5% | $58,500 |
| 38 contributions · 8.1% | $55,500 |
| 10 contributions · 3.1% | $21,000 |
| 6 contributions · 2.3% | $15,750 |
| 7 contributions · 2% | $13,500 |
| 12 contributions · 1.8% | $12,500 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 30 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 21 contributions · 5.9% of ranked | $36,000 |
| 10 contributions · 5.8% of ranked | $35,000 |
| 9 contributions · 5.2% of ranked | $31,500 |
| 6 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $12,500 |
| 3 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 5 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $10,250 |
| 4 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 6 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $8,500 |
A further $74,350 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($8,130) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $805 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $1,250,062
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 708 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
28 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $36,729 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 48 payments · 20% of all spending | $279,621 |
| 14 payments · 16% of all spending | $220,289 |
| 5 payments · 12% of all spending | $167,460 |
| 9 payments · 4.8% of all spending | $67,755 |
| 18 payments · 4.7% of all spending | $65,737 |
| 19 payments · 4.1% of all spending | $57,000 |
| 19 payments · 2.7% of all spending | $38,440 |
| 14 payments · 2% of all spending | $27,596 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 47 contributions · 12% of ranked | $85,025 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 47 contributions · 9.1% of ranked | $62,600 |
| 23 contributions · 8% of ranked | $55,000 |
| 52 contributions · 8% of ranked | $54,850 |
| 30 contributions · 7.5% of ranked | $51,300 |
| 34 contributions · 5.1% of ranked | $35,330 |
| 13 contributions · 2.7% of ranked | $18,800 |
| 5 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $15,000 |
A further $3,750 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($8,130) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.