Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (qualified)Lobbyist/registrant PACTrade associationWashington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: America's Credit Unions
Political fund of America's Credit Unions
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00007880 · files monthly
“Our mission is to advocate for and advance an environment where credit unions thrive. In collaboration with our league partners, we will always fight for policies that allow you to better serve your members and communities. Check out our work on issues with Congress and regulatory agencies.”
America's Credit Unions, the organization this committee is the political fund of, americascreditunions.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
7 priorities from the site of America's Credit Unions, the organization this committee is the political fund of, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
With — and for you — we will advocate for and advance an environment where credit unions thrive.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · americascreditunions.org
Heading as listed on americascreditunions.org ↗ (opens americascreditunions.org at this heading) · “Helping to achieve the American dream” on americascreditunions.org ↗ (opens americascreditunions.org at this heading)
We are relentless champions for credit unions at the federal level and work hand-in-hand with our League partners to advance our shared state and local needs.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · americascreditunions.org
We will defend credit unions from attacks to advance communities, improve the financial future for all people, and keep local economies strong.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · americascreditunions.org/advocacy
Heading as listed on americascreditunions.org ↗ (opens americascreditunions.org at this heading)
We are dedicated to ensuring the needs of more than 140 million people nationwide are met, and that credit unions are empowered to serve their members and communities effectively.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · americascreditunions.org
We are relentless in our efforts to ensure credit unions can equip their 146 million members with the resources and tools needed to secure their financial future.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · americascreditunions.org/advocacy
Heading as listed on americascreditunions.org ↗ (opens americascreditunions.org at this heading)
We are boldly addressing a rapidly evolving financial landscape to create a better environment for credit unions nationwide, safeguarding their crucial role in the financial system.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · americascreditunions.org
We fiercely advocate for a legislative and regulatory environment where credit unions can deliver greater affordability and access to consumers.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · americascreditunions.org/advocacy
Heading as listed on americascreditunions.org ↗ (opens americascreditunions.org at this heading)
Heading as listed on americascreditunions.org ↗ (opens americascreditunions.org at this heading)
Talking points, research, and trackers for a collective look at our top priorities.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · americascreditunions.org/advocacy/issues/resource-library
America’s Credit Unions provides forward-thinking advocacy to secure policy wins that allow credit unions to thrive.
Issues ↗ (opens americascreditunions.org/advocacy at this heading)
Our mission is to advocate for and advance an environment where credit unions thrive.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · americascreditunions.org/advocacy
America’s Credit Unions is the unified voice of the credit union movement.
We are relentless champions for our member credit unions and work hand-in-hand with Leagues, credit unions, and industry partners to advance our shared federal, state, and local needs.
We do not waver in our commitment to advocate for a better future, for every credit union, large and small.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · americascreditunions.org/advocacy
Strong leadership and strategic communication.
These qualities and resources are why America’s Credit Unions and the Leagues are ranked among the most influential trade associations in Washington, D.C.
Together, with a unified voice, we are boldly addressing challenges and working to advance policies that empower every credit union — large and small, rural and urban — across the country.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · americascreditunions.org/about-us/leagues
Heading as listed on americascreditunions.org/about-us/leagues ↗ (opens americascreditunions.org/about-us/leagues at this heading) · “Leagues” on americascreditunions.org/about-us/leagues ↗ (opens americascreditunions.org/about-us/leagues at this heading)
America’s Credit Unions is a national trade association that gives a unified voice to credit unions across the country.
In partnership with Leagues and system partners, we advocate for policies that help credit unions succeed.
Together, we empower credit unions to better serve their members, helping people reach their financial goals and strengthening the communities they call home.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · americascreditunions.org/about-us
We take our responsibility to shape the financial fabric of our country seriously because the impact of credit unions can be felt at every kitchen table across America.
America’s Credit Unions will be relentless in our mission to advocate for and advance an environment where credit unions thrive.
We will ensure that people everywhere have an opportunity to trust and partner with credit unions so they can afford and achieve their best financial lives.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · americascreditunions.org/about-us
Credit unions deliver what Washington says it wants: Competition. Affordability. Opportunity.
For nearly 120 years, credit unions have helped Americans achieve the American dream.
Founded in the early 1900s to provide an alternative to predatory lenders, credit unions were built on a simple principle: financial services should serve people, not profit.
Today, that mission remains as important as ever.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · americascreditunions.org/advocacy/making-financial-opportunity-more-accessible
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 193 | $1,053,500 | $500,000 | $1,553,500 | 53% |
| Democratic | 193 | $992,500 | $300,000 | $1,292,500 | 44% |
| Other or unresolved | 29 | $99,000 | $0 | $99,000 | 3.4% |
| Shown support | 415 | $2,145,000 | $800,000 | $2,945,000 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 196 | $1M · 32% |
| Republican candidates | 194 | $1.1M · 34% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 31 | $111.5K · 3.6% |
| Democratic party committees | 2 | $120K · 3.9% |
| Republican party committees | 2 | $120K · 3.9% |
| Other PACs and committees | 115 | $703K · 23% |
| All recipients | 540 | $3.1M |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 50 | $276K |
| Texas | 43 | $178K |
| Florida | 23 | $108K |
| Illinois | 21 | $104.5K |
| Georgia | 16 | $94K |
| New York | 21 | $80.5K |
| Michigan | 11 | $76.5K |
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 20,659 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.6M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 3 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $66.2K from 3 sources in all.
Total reported receipts $4,892,852
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2,199 contributions · 15% | $239,495 |
| 1,604 contributions · 6.7% | $106,835 |
Total reported disbursements $5,520,723
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $1,997,905 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$5.5M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1M, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending.
Besides giving through its PAC, Credit Union National Association. Inc. DBA America's Credit Unions pays lobbyists to press Congress and federal agencies. Each quarter it, or a firm it hires, files a public report under the Lobbying Disclosure Act saying which topics it worked on, what it spent, and whom it contacted. This is what those reports say.
Each report files its work under official topics. The bar shows how often each topic came up across the reports; open one to read what was filed under it. Naming a bill says the organization lobbied on it, not which side it took.
The organization’s own reports give its total lobbying costs, including any firms it hired; each firm reports what this client paid it.
Reported twice a year by the lobbying filer. $75.5K is political giving that also appears in FEC filings.
Matched by name: these reports are filed for “CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. INC. DBA AMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS”, found by searching “AMERICA CREDIT UNIONS”. Lobbying and FEC records share no ID, so an organization that lobbies under another name is missed. Source: LDA.gov, accessed Oct 27, 2026. Senate Office of Public Records cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from LDA.gov.
America's Credit Unions PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Its FEC record names America's Credit Unions as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
America's Credit Unions PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| Pennsylvania |
|---|
| 12 |
| $59K |
The largest 8 of 51 states.
Bars drawn to $60K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to OHIO CREDIT UNION LEAGUE · 5 payments | $220K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to LEAGUE OF SOUTHEASTERN CREDIT UNIONS · 3 payments | $185K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to CAROLINAS CREDIT UNION LEAGUE · 2 payments | $100K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to INDIANA CREDIT UNION LEAGUE · 4 payments | $73K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to KENTUCKY CREDIT UNION LEAGUE INC. · 1 payment | $26.1K |
$604.1K from 5 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $60K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $60K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to COLE COMBINED COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $60K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $60K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BLUE WAVE CALIFORNIA VICTORY FUND · 8 payments | $15K |
| House campaign committee · 3 payments | $12.5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to 2025 SENATORS CLASSIC COMMITTEE · 7 payments | $12.5K |
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| 1,527 contributions · 6% |
| $95,357 |
| 1,782 contributions · 5.4% | $86,011 |
| 1,350 contributions · 5.3% | $83,556 |
| 1,187 contributions · 4.7% | $73,990 |
| 524 contributions · 4.5% | $71,553 |
| 1,059 contributions · 4.2% | $67,217 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 535 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $49,113 |
| 377 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $43,670 |
| 496 contributions · 3% of ranked | $40,047 |
| 339 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $27,847 |
| 56 contributions · 2% of ranked | $26,520 |
| 175 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $24,294 |
| 449 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $22,993 |
| 346 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $22,342 |
Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,765,140) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3,018 contributions · 34% of ranked | $457,653 |
| 1,050 contributions · 10% of ranked | $138,823 |
| 520 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $50,847 |
| 179 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $43,143 |
| 334 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $31,881 |
| 220 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $19,611 |
| 320 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $18,754 |
| 291 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $18,113 |
A further $3,150 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,765,140) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $3,694,527
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,182 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 payments · 9.1% of all spending | $500,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $60,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $60,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $60,000 |
| 2 payments · 1.1% of all spending | $60,000 |
| 19 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $17,228 |
| 41 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $16,003 |
| 19 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $15,970 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| House campaign committee · 5 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BLUE TO THE FUTURE 2024 · 5 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to MIKE KENNEDY VICTORY FUND · 3 payments | $10K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
$3.1M across 548 recipient committees, or 56% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown. A further $5K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.