Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › NC-01 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, NC-01
Representative since 2023
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
6 priorities from votedondavis.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Families across eastern North Carolina are feeling the squeeze from higher grocery, gas, healthcare, and housing costs. Don Davis is fighting to lower prescription drug prices, make housing more affordable, and protect working families from price increases that hit their wallets the hardest. Don believes that if you work hard, you should be able to afford a good life and get ahead.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · votedondavis.com/delivering-new-page
Strong communities are built on good-paying jobs and economic opportunity. Don is working to create jobs in eastern North Carolina, help small businesses grow, attract new investment to rural communities, and expand workforce training. He believes your future shouldn't be determined by your zip code, whether you live in a rural community or in a big city.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · votedondavis.com/delivering-new-page
Don Davis has spent more than two decades in education because he believes every student deserves the opportunity to succeed. In Congress, he's fighting to strengthen our schools, expand early childhood education, make college and workforce training more affordable, and invest in the next generation of North Carolina's leaders. For Don, education is the key to stronger families, stronger communities, and a stronger economy.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · votedondavis.com/delivering-new-page
Don Davis has helped secure millions in infrastructure investments for eastern North Carolina because strong communities depend on strong infrastructure. He's working to support rural hospitals, strengthen family farms, and expand reliable high-speed internet so families, students, and businesses can succeed in every corner of our region. From our coastal communities to our inland farms, Don delivers for eastern North Carolina.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · votedondavis.com/delivering-new-page
Don wore the uniform and understands the commitment required to serve our country. In Congress, he's fighting to improve veterans' healthcare, reduce delays in benefits, support military families, and strengthen VA services. He believes that honoring our veterans means more than words, it means keeping our promises to those who have served our great nation.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · votedondavis.com/delivering-new-page
Don believes results matter more than partisan politics. That's why he works with independents, Republicans, and Democrats, who are willing to put eastern North Carolina first. His focus is on common-sense solutions that strengthen communities, grow the economy, and deliver real results for local families. Don believes public service is about serving the people, not scoring political points.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · votedondavis.com/delivering-new-page
78% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 142 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Agriculture
House Committee on Armed Services
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Davis’ 57 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00795211
90¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($5.3M of $5.8M). Cash on hand went from $528.4K on Mar 31, 2025 to $825.8K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $327,828 | $70,227 | $528,443 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $689,333 | $105,379 | $1,112,397 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $556,512 | $112,219 | $1,556,690 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $516,477 | $139,614 | $1,933,553 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Feb 11, 2026 | $114,535 | $91,913 | $1,956,175 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $1,027,400 | $103,504 | $2,880,071 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $1,055,300 | $365,005 | $3,570,366 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $1,285,193 | $2,827,848 | $2,027,710 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $232,904 | $1,434,797 | $825,818 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Endorsements we could not read
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Latest poll · Neighborhood Research Corporation, Oct 6, 2026 · too few nonpartisan polls for a lead
A poll is a snapshot, not a forecast.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 2,199 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.9M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 910 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.8M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 9 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 19 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $562.6K.
Total reported receipts $5,805,482
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
8.8% of the money placed by state came from inside North Carolina: $162.8K of $1.9M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 400 contributions · 26% | $474,709 |
| 186 contributions · 15% | $270,393 |
| 213 contributions · 11% | $202,760 |
| 544 contributions · 8.8% | $162,843 |
| 78 contributions · 5.2% | $96,045 |
| 56 contributions · 4.7% | $87,331 |
| 71 contributions · 4.6% | $84,603 |
| 137 contributions · 4% | $73,460 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 45 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1,141 contributions · 49% of ranked | $782,292 |
| Written instead of an employer · 241 contributions · 13% of ranked | $205,712 |
| 2 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $14,000 |
| 3 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 3 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $10,500 |
| 3 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $8,500 |
| 3 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $7,500 |
A further $17,342 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($573,801) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $45,363 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $2,241,035
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,528 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
13 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $6,971 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3 payments · 17% of all spending | $892,448 |
| 3 payments · 5.9% of all spending | $310,000 |
| 40 payments · 5.3% of all spending | $277,933 |
| 4 payments · 1.2% of all spending | $65,200 |
| 97 payments · 0.9% of all spending | $45,764 |
| 17 payments · 0.9% of all spending | $45,413 |
| 8 payments · 0.9% of all spending | $45,000 |
| 8 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $43,643 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 971 contributions · 34% of ranked | $610,186 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 170 contributions · 9.5% of ranked | $172,106 |
| 64 contributions · 5.8% of ranked | $105,300 |
| 100 contributions · 4.3% of ranked | $78,462 |
| 56 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $56,384 |
| 30 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $45,344 |
| 20 contributions · 2.2% of ranked | $39,750 |
| 20 contributions · 2% of ranked | $35,750 |
A further $17,342 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($573,801) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.