Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
Hybrid PAC (qualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: Jewish Democracy Project
Democratic Majority for Israel Super PAC (Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile)
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00710848 · files monthly
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
“DMFI PAC works to elect pro-Israel Democrats up and down the ballot and defeat those few anti-Israel Democratic candidates in federal election primaries.
In the 2024 general election cycle, 80% of DMFI PAC-endorsed candidates won their general election races. Overall, our ads were seen or heard by nearly 40 million voters in targeted states and districts. DMFI PAC and its affiliates raised and spent more than $11 million for pro-Israel Democrats up and down the ballot. DMFI PAC and its allied groups spent 65% of its IE dollars supporting candidates of color and 46% supporting women.”
Dmfi PAC, on its own site, dmfipac.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
1 priority from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
The Democratic Party has had a long, proud history of supporting the U.S.-Israel relationship that has endured for more than 75 years, grounded in our shared values and common interests.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dmfipac.org/who
Democrats have a long history of staunch support for Israel.
President Truman was the first world leader to recognize the State of Israel, marking the beginning of a strong alliance between the U.S. and Israel that has endured for over 70 years.
On Israel’s 10th anniversary in 1958, then-Senator John F. Kennedy celebrated Israel’s successes of the previous decade and praised the nation’s “inner strength and harmony.”
President Clinton worked tirelessly to bring peace.
I had a deal they turned down…”
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · dmfipac.org/who/democrats-on-israel
Heading as listed on dmfipac.org/who ↗ (opens dmfipac.org/who at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 79 | $192K · 100% |
| All recipients | 79 | $192K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Florida | 11 | $34K |
| California | 12 | $29K |
| New York | 12 | $25.5K |
| Texas | 6 | $12K |
| Washington | 4 | $11K |
| Michigan | 4 | $10.5K |
| North Carolina | 3 | $10K |
| Arizona | 2 | $7.5K |
The largest 8 of 21 states.
The 12 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $1.6M from 2 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $7,481,100
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3 contributions · 64% | $3,500,000 |
| 4 contributions · 14% | $760,000 |
| 134 contributions · 13% | $692,355 |
| 90 contributions · 6% | $329,065 |
| 9 contributions · 1.9% | $103,700 |
| 44 contributions · 0.4% |
Total reported disbursements $7,776,455
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $3,659,734 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$7.8M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $2.7M, May 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending. The line stops at the latest report, through Oct 14, 2026, at the dashed rule; elections after it are marked where they fall.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Democratic Majority for Israel Super PAC Linked public record: LittleSis organization profile.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Dmfi PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $5K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 1 payment | $16K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to MOSKOWITZ VICTORY FUND · 4 payments | $7.5K |
| House campaign committee · 3 payments | $7.5K |
| House campaign committee · 4 payments | $7K |
| House campaign committee · 3 payments | $6K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to DEMOCRATIC FUTURE LEADERSHIP FUND · 3 payments | $6K |
| Senate campaign committee · 2 payments | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to CHRIS PAPPAS VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $5K |
| Senate campaign committee · 2 payments | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NEW POLITICS NEXT MISSION FUND · 2 payments | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to BLUE TO THE FUTURE 2024 · 2 payments | $5K |
$208K across 71 recipient committees, or 2.7% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown. A further $37.8K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| $20,123 |
| 6 contributions · 0.3% | $18,020 |
| 16 contributions · 0.3% | $17,600 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 40 contributions · 65% of ranked | $3,566,625 |
| Written instead of an employer · 124 contributions · 19% of ranked | $1,044,539 |
| 1 contribution · 2.7% of ranked | $150,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.7% of ranked | $150,000 |
| 3 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $125,000 |
| 1 contribution · 1.8% of ranked | $100,000 |
| 2 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $86,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.9% of ranked | $50,000 |
A further $7,000 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($49,442) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 9 contributions · 64% of ranked | $3,500,600 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 113 contributions · 17% of ranked | $934,233 |
| 5 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $211,000 |
| 3 contributions · 3.7% of ranked | $205,000 |
| 1 contribution · 2.7% of ranked | $150,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 11 contributions · 2% of ranked | $110,306 |
| 1 contribution · 1.8% of ranked | $100,000 |
| 4 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $50,000 |
A further $7,000 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($49,442) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $317,784
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 265 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 17 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $54,000 |
| 8 payments · 0.4% of all spending | $33,723 |
| 1 payment · 0.2% of all spending | $16,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.2% of all spending | $15,671 |
| 110 payments · 0.1% of all spending | $9,005 |
| 4 payments · <0.1% of all spending | $7,500 |
| 3 payments · <0.1% of all spending | $7,500 |
| 4 payments · <0.1% of all spending | $7,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.