Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › Michigan U.S. Senate race › 2025–2026
DemocraticU.S. SenateMichigan
Representative since 2019
No campaign site or public profiles are attached to this record yet.
Haley M. Stevens’ words are not shown
96% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 25 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Education and Workforce
House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology
House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Stevens’ 108 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Apr 22, 2025 to Sep 30, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00903039
99¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 7 reports ($13.2M of $13.3M). Cash on hand went from $2M on Jun 30, 2025 to $152.3K on Sep 30, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $2,816,630 | $860,152 | $1,956,478 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $1,903,445 | $1,242,123 | $2,617,801 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $2,119,597 | $1,671,104 | $3,066,294 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $2,030,799 | $1,708,175 | $3,388,918 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $2,093,302 | $2,063,418 | $3,418,802 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 15, 2026 | $920,859 | $1,546,367 | $2,793,294 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $1,419,529 | $4,060,485 | $152,338 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Not read yet
Lost · 728,041 votes (47%) · 2 of 3 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Election November 3, 2026 · 38 polls of this matchup
Abdul El-Sayed leads Mike Rogers by 2.9 points · average gap, 5 latest nonpartisan polls
Each dot is a poll. The line is the median of the 5 latest nonpartisan polls. How polls are read
Abdul El-Sayed won by 0.9 points. The 4 final polls had a median of Abdul El-Sayed +2.3, overstating Abdul El-Sayed's margin by 1.4 points.
| Poll | Abdul El-Sayed | Mike Rogers | Lead | vs. result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| InsiderAdvantageended Oct 22 | 47.2% | 46% | Abdul El-Sayed +1.2 | +0.3 |
| Glengariff Group, Inc.ended Oct 22 | 51.4% | 45.1% | Abdul El-Sayed +6.3 | +5.4 |
| Michigan State University Institute for Public Policy and Social Research/YouGovended Oct 19 | 48% | 45.5% | Abdul El-Sayed +2.5 | +1.6 |
| Marist Universityended Oct 18 | 50% | 48% | Abdul El-Sayed +2 | +1.1 |
| Median of the final polls | Abdul El-Sayed +2.3 | +1.4 | ||
| Result | 47.5% | 46.6% | Abdul El-Sayed +0.9 |
November 3, 2026 · Result (unofficial) · Each pollster's last poll ending in the 21 days before the vote, read for the two leading finishers; the median leaves out polls a side paid for
Pairings that are not the race on the ballot: candidates who lost a primary or withdrew, or a party's unnamed nominee. They are not charted.
Primary August 4, 2026 · 17 polls
Abdul El-Sayed leads Haley Stevens by 10.8 points · average gap, 4 latest nonpartisan polls · 1 far-off poll left out
Poll data from The New York Times, licensed CC BY 4.0 · Updated October 28, 2026 · 27 polls paid for by a party or campaign are left out
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
No campaign pages quoted
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 17,134 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $7.2M.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 3 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 11 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $1.7M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 278 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $929.8K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Total reported receipts $13,304,162
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
23% of the money placed by state came from inside Michigan: $1.6M of $7.2M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 6,088 contributions · 23% | $1,636,696 |
| 1,199 contributions · 16% | $1,114,832 |
| 2,280 contributions · 15% | $1,090,734 |
| 1,310 contributions · 9.4% | $672,070 |
| 471 contributions · 4.6% | $332,775 |
| 484 contributions · 4.3% | $311,096 |
| 658 contributions · 4.2% | $300,864 |
| 322 contributions · 3.4% | $247,243 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 48 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 11,687 contributions · 54% of ranked | $2,467,247 |
| Written instead of an employer · 1,112 contributions · 15% of ranked | $666,471 |
| Written instead of an employer · 35 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $62,050 |
| 12 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $38,000 |
| 16 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $19,355 |
| 6 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $18,500 |
| 6 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $17,000 |
| 11 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $16,600 |
A further $86,985 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,591,312) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $1,656,804 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $7,461,334
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Sep 30, 2026.
All 2,795 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
96 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $1,704,915 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 98 payments · 19% of all spending | $2,528,733 |
| 37 payments · 9.3% of all spending | $1,220,837 |
| 6 payments · 2.8% of all spending | $364,350 |
| 15 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $312,500 |
| 18 payments · 2.1% of all spending | $281,504 |
| 1 payment · 2% of all spending | $260,750 |
| 16 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $174,948 |
| 163 payments · 1.3% of all spending | $171,795 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
Each dot is a poll. The line is the median of the 5 latest nonpartisan polls. How polls are read
Abdul El-Sayed won by 1 point. The 3 final polls had a median of Abdul El-Sayed +14, overstating Abdul El-Sayed's margin by 13 points.
| Poll | Abdul El-Sayed | Haley Stevens | Lead | vs. result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mitchell Research & Communicationsended Jul 29 | 52% | 38% | Abdul El-Sayed +14 | +13 |
| Tavern Researchended Jul 27 | 46% | 36% | Abdul El-Sayed +10 | +9 |
| Emerson Collegeended Jul 27 | 57.1% | 40.8% | Abdul El-Sayed +16.3 | +15.3 |
| Median of the final polls | Abdul El-Sayed +14 | +13 | ||
| Result | 48.5% | 47.5% | Abdul El-Sayed +1 |
August 4, 2026 · Result (unofficial, 99% reporting) · Each pollster's last poll ending in the 21 days before the vote, read for the two leading finishers; the median leaves out polls a side paid for
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 10,501 contributions · 24% of ranked | $1,578,682 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 1,224 contributions · 14% of ranked | $947,870 |
| 797 contributions · 10% of ranked | $694,977 |
| 218 contributions · 4.4% of ranked | $294,084 |
| 230 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $237,221 |
| 167 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $235,920 |
| 102 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $169,860 |
| 266 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $168,336 |
A further $54,468 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,591,312) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.