Ammar Campa-Najjar (D) for Congress, California's 48th, 2026

Skip to content

Where They Stand

Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →

Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.

Who donated: where they live, their employers and jobs

Where the donors live $4,771 placed by state

Loading the map

Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.

under $191
$191+
$763+
$1.7K+
$3.1K+
none
Outlined: California, home state

Home state and away

California 100%CA 100%

100% of the money placed by state came from inside California: $4.8K of $4.8K.

Top states

Top donor states
Name		Amount
California home1 contribution · 100%		$4,771

By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 1 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.

Donors’ employers as filed

Donors’ employers
Employer as filed		Amount
US Navy1 contribution · 100% of ranked		$4,771

Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.

Donors’ occupations as filed

Donors’ occupations
Occupation as filed		Amount
Officer1 contribution · 100% of ranked		$4,771

Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.

Outside spending $12,845,472 across this race

Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.

DAmmar Campa-Najjarthis candidate5 groupsSupporting $735.2KOpposing $2.5MTotal $3.2M

Dmfi PAC Opposes5 records, latest May 21, 2026$2,000,000
Votevets Supports4 records, latest Apr 30, 2026$443,774
Health Care Saves Lives Opposes7 records, latest May 28, 2026$322,894
Serving CA Supports34 records, latest May 28, 2026$291,388
Crush Maga PAC Opposes2 records, latest May 15, 2026$160,675

RJim Desmond11 groupsSupporting $285KOpposing $5.5MTotal $5.8M

HMP Opposes33 records, latest Oct 22, 2026$4,292,669
Health Care Saves Lives Opposes11 records, latest Oct 23, 2026$800,944
48TH Accountability Project Opposes35 records, latest Jul 22, 2026$338,278
NO Going Back PAC Inc. Supports4 records, latest Oct 6, 2026$134,303
Civic Renewal Fund Inc. Supports6 records, latest Oct 23, 2026$79,452

DMarni Von Wilpert21 groupsSupporting $2.5MOpposing $1.1MTotal $3.6M

DBrandon Riker4 groupsSupporting $236.9KOpposing $0Total $236.9K

Upset the Setup Supports6 records, latest May 28, 2026$198,346
Blue Majority Project Supports6 records, latest Feb 9, 2026$34,960
Democratic Future PAC Supports2 records, latest Apr 20, 2026$2,600
Blue Democracy Network Supports1 record, latest Apr 20, 2026$1,013

Brandon Riker’s profile →

What these totals do and do not cover

Support and oppose are each group’s own labels, not a judgment made here.
$9,626,743 of the race total was filed about other candidates, so it would not show on Campa-Najjar’s own record.
Independent expenditures (Schedule E) only. Electioneering communications and corporate or union member communications file separately; they are counted for Campa-Najjarunder “Other outside spending” in the full finance detail, but not for the rest of the field, so every other row is a floor.

Largest vendors

Largest vendors
Name		Amount
River City Business Services24 payments · 100% of all spending		$4,832

The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.