Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00685297 · files monthly
“Elect Democratic Women was formed in 2018 by Democratic members of Congress with the purpose of electing more pro-choice Democratic women to Congress and higher office, based on the understanding that democracy is best served by a diverse Congress that reflects the people they represent.”
Elect Democratic Women, on its own site, electdemocraticwomen.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
2 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Elect Democratic Women is focused on electing more Democratic women to Congress and higher office.
Elect Democratic Women was formed by Democratic Congresswomen who understand that Congress cannot and will not address the urgent needs facing women and their families by a Congress where less than one in five representatives are women.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · electdemocraticwomen.org
Heading as listed on electdemocraticwomen.org ↗ (opens electdemocraticwomen.org at this heading)
Elect Democratic Women was formed in 2018 by Democratic members of Congress with the purpose of electing more pro-choice Democratic women to Congress and higher office, based on the understanding that democracy is best served by a diverse Congress that reflects the people they represent.
It is the only member-led political action committee dedicated to increasing the number of women in Congress.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · electdemocraticwomen.org/about
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 169 | $724.5K · 27% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 5 | $10.5K · 0.4% |
| Democratic party committees | 1 | $5K · 0.2% |
| Other party committees | 1 | $210K · 7.8% |
| Other PACs and committees | 18 | $1.8M · 65% |
| All recipients | 194 | $2.7M |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 19 | $86K |
| Florida | 12 | $48.5K |
| Illinois | 13 | $44.5K |
| Texas | 7 | $43.5K |
| Michigan | 9 | $43K |
| Pennsylvania | 9 | $39.5K |
| Oregon | 9 | $38.5K |
| Ohio | 6 | $30K |
The largest 8 of 34 states.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 55,085 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.6M. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
The 10 largest committees by total given are listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
The 4 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $102.2K from 4 sources in all.
Total reported receipts $8,070,880
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 10,825 contributions · 19% | $297,477 |
| 2,137 contributions · 7.2% | $111,112 |
Total reported disbursements $8,553,387
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $1,859,135 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$8.6M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.1M, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Elect Democratic Women is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). Its FEC record names Pro-Choice Women as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Elect Democratic Women is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
LittleSis data is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Bars drawn to $1.6M, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to ELECT DEMOCRATIC WOMEN · 5 payments | $800K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to ELECT DEMOCRATIC WOMEN · 3 payments | $465K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to DELTA AIRLINES · 2 payments | $10K |
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICA'S CREDIT UNIONS · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to TRANSPORT WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO · 2 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE (AAJ) · 3 payments | $10K |
| PAC (qualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
$2.1M from 130 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle. The largest 12 are shown.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to PRO-CHOICE MAJORITY 2024 · 9 payments | $1.6M |
| Party committee (qualified) · 10 payments | $210K |
| PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to ELECT DEMOCRATIC WOMEN · 2 payments | $115K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 1 payment | $75K |
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 2 payments | $10K |
| Senate campaign committee · Connected to FISH FAMILY FREEDOM FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 10 payments | $10K |
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| 2,272 contributions · 5.8% |
| $89,409 |
| 3,597 contributions · 5.6% | $86,832 |
| 3,167 contributions · 5.5% | $84,583 |
| 286 contributions · 5.4% | $84,463 |
| 2,241 contributions · 4.6% | $71,025 |
| 2,936 contributions · 4.3% | $66,147 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 47,528 contributions · 72% of ranked | $1,032,090 |
| Written instead of an employer · 2,436 contributions · 6.8% of ranked | $97,970 |
| 2 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 7 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $8,000 |
| 4 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $7,500 |
| 3 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $6,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $6,000 |
| 3 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $6,000 |
A further $71,966 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($3,841,846) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 45,292 contributions · 67% of ranked | $983,548 |
| 463 contributions · 3.8% of ranked | $55,350 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 2,236 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $48,542 |
| 18 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $33,476 |
| 130 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $28,384 |
| 29 contributions · 1.6% of ranked | $23,691 |
| 11 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $13,850 |
| 15 contributions · 0.8% of ranked | $11,939 |
A further $71,966 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($3,841,846) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
Total itemized disbursements $6,503,841
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,546 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
73 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $383,547 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 84 payments · 21% of all spending | $1,804,856 |
| 9 payments · 19% of all spending | $1,645,000 |
| 184 payments · 3.8% of all spending | $326,720 |
| 38 payments · 3.7% of all spending | $315,481 |
| 28 payments · 2.6% of all spending | $221,990 |
| 112 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $210,624 |
| 23 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $210,577 |
| 10 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $210,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| House campaign committee · Connected to LEELA GRAY VICTORY FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to DEMOCRATIC FUTURE LEADERSHIP FUND · 7 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to NEW POLITICS NEXT MISSION FUND · 3 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to THE DEMOCRATIC BENCH FUND · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 3 payments | $10K |
$2.8M across 149 recipient committees, or 33% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown. A further $2.5K was filed as memo entries, which FEC reports separately to avoid counting it twice.