Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › IA-03 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, IA-03
Representative since 2023
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
8 priorities from zachnunn.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
As a father of six, Zach is familiar with the struggles too many Iowa families face. He is fighting to make it easier for parents to work, raise families, and pay the bills. His first bill that passed the House of Representatives expanded parental leave for military parents, ensuring those who serve our country have time with new children. He’s also led the charge to simplify adoption, expand child care options, and support working parents.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · zachnunn.com/issues
Heading as listed on zachnunn.com/issues ↗ (opens zachnunn.com/issues at this heading)
Zach put his life on the line to protect our First and Second Amendment Rights – he’s a firm believer in the right to free speech and the right to bear arms. Right now, our country is under attack from the radical efforts of the far left and Big Tech who are muzzling our constitutional rights. In Washington, he’s putting a stop to any DC politicians who try to tell us how to act or how to defend our families.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · zachnunn.com/issues
Heading as listed on zachnunn.com/issues ↗ (opens zachnunn.com/issues at this heading)
Out-of-control government spending has caused inflation to skyrocket, impacting every Iowa family’s ability to balance their checkbook. In Congress, he passed legislation to rein in government bureaucracy and the liberal wish lists impeding our economy. We must stop the tax-and-spend policies that have driven us to record cost levels and help get Americans back to work
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · zachnunn.com/issues
Heading as listed on zachnunn.com/issues ↗ (opens zachnunn.com/issues at this heading)
Iowa is a special place and we need to keep it that way. As your voice in Washington, Zach is fighting to keep our families and neighborhoods safe by supporting our heroes in law enforcement and first responders who serve our communities. As your representative, he helped pass the most comprehensive border security solution – ensuring that we’re combatting the flow of illegal drugs, human trafficking, and exploitation coming across our Southern Border.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · zachnunn.com/issues
Heading as listed on zachnunn.com/issues ↗ (opens zachnunn.com/issues at this heading)
As a faith-oriented man, Zach will always stand with Iowa’s most vulnerable – that means protecting our seniors, our disabled, and our unborn. He is a recognized pro-life leader, committed to fighting for the unborn. Zach continues to advocate for Iowa’s next generations in Washington, while Democrats continue to allow abortion on demand. As a father of six, two of which he adopted last year, Zach is fighting in Congress to simplify the adoption process and ensure every child finds their forever home.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · zachnunn.com/issues
Heading as listed on zachnunn.com/issues ↗ (opens zachnunn.com/issues at this heading)
America is the greatest nation in the world and we must continue protecting our citizens from all enemies foreign and domestic – both at home and abroad. As a 20 year combat veteran, Zach knows the importance of a strong military when it comes to defending our country, protecting democracy, and promoting peace. In Washington, he supported policies that not only adequately fund our military but prioritize our veterans, active military, military families, and mental health.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · zachnunn.com/issues
Heading as listed on zachnunn.com/issues ↗ (opens zachnunn.com/issues at this heading)
The hands, hearts, and hard work of Iowa farmers feed and fuel our country. Zach fights in DC for a Farm Bill to ensure Iowa’s farmers and rural communities have support they need to continue to drive Iowa’s economy. Also a tireless advocate for Iowa’s biofuels and ethanol producers, he pushed for strong support for renewable fuels that help make America more energy independent. He’ll continue to be a voice at the table for Iowa’s rural communities, ensuring their voice drives decisions – not Washington bureaucrats.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · zachnunn.com/issues
Heading as listed on zachnunn.com/issues ↗ (opens zachnunn.com/issues at this heading)
As Iowans, we live in tight-knit communities and will always lend a helping hand to our neighbors during natural disasters and tough times. We are selfless, hard-working, and honest people living right in the Heartland of America – and Zach is working every day to bring more of these values to Washington.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · zachnunn.com/issues
Heading as listed on zachnunn.com/issues ↗ (opens zachnunn.com/issues at this heading)
96% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 25 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Agriculture
House Committee on Financial Services
House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Nunn’s 107 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00784389
91¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($5.6M of $6.1M). Cash on hand went from $687.8K on Mar 31, 2025 to $620.8K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $751,491 | $116,511 | $687,813 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $803,352 | $191,568 | $1,299,598 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $524,657 | $213,845 | $1,610,410 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $535,480 | $163,920 | $1,981,970 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $1,267,750 | $209,587 | $3,040,134 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026 | $264,209 | $143,837 | $3,160,505 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $722,310 | $314,446 | $3,568,369 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $1,099,704 | $3,248,618 | $1,419,455 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $154,788 | $953,484 | $620,759 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
2 endorsers listed on Zachary Nunn’s own campaign site.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
“The U.S. Chamber is proud to endorse Congressman Zach Nunn for reelection in Iowa’s Third Congressional District. He has been a strong advocate for pro-growth policies that strengthen the economy, support job creation, and help businesses of all sizes succeed,” said Tom Wickham, Vice President and Managing Director of the U.S. Chamber’s Government Affairs team. “We are pleased to support his campaign and look forward to building on our partnership in the next Congress.”
Advanced · 48,302 votes (99%) · 1 of 1 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Latest poll · Public Policy Polling, Sep 18, 2025 · too few nonpartisan polls for a lead
A poll is a snapshot, not a forecast.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 8 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 53 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $2.1M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 963 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $2.1M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 6,264 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $871.3K.
Total reported receipts $6,123,740
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
15% of the money placed by state came from inside Iowa: $130.1K of $871.3K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 310 contributions · 15% | $130,066 |
| 808 contributions · 13% | $114,114 |
| 280 contributions · 8.7% | $75,473 |
| 652 contributions · 8.5% | $73,818 |
| 820 contributions · 8.4% | $72,925 |
| 143 contributions · 7.9% | $68,432 |
| 34 contributions · 4.3% | $37,550 |
| 483 contributions · 3.4% | $29,209 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 51 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 4,957 contributions · 19% of ranked | $143,427 |
| Written instead of an employer · 314 contributions · 9.2% of ranked | $68,358 |
| 5 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $21,000 |
| 5 contributions · 2% of ranked | $14,500 |
| 3 contributions · 1.5% of ranked | $11,500 |
| Written instead of an employer · 15 contributions · 1.3% of ranked | $9,508 |
| 4 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $8,500 |
| 7 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $7,900 |
A further $98,534 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($172,796) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $5,884 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $2,305,288
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 2,151 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
36 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $237,182 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3 payments · 16% of all spending | $876,524 |
| 17 payments · 4.4% of all spending | $244,994 |
| 17 payments · 4% of all spending | $224,020 |
| 31 payments · 2.7% of all spending | $151,779 |
| 12 payments · 2.4% of all spending | $130,817 |
| 19 payments · 2% of all spending | $108,960 |
| 5 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $101,725 |
| 1 payment · 1.8% of all spending | $100,100 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 4,957 contributions · 19% of ranked | $143,427 |
| 192 contributions · 14% of ranked | $105,840 |
| 34 contributions · 3.9% of ranked | $30,250 |
| 11 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $28,000 |
| 13 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $27,701 |
| 6 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $25,500 |
| 44 contributions · 3.2% of ranked | $24,325 |
| 31 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $21,332 |
A further $99,609 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($172,796) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.