Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
Hybrid PAC (nonqualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: Pro-Choice Majority 2024
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00863472 · files monthly
Notices dated after Oct 14, 2026 are added; earlier ones are already in the regular reports.
“History is clear, more women in Congress means policies that better uplift women and families. EDW Action Fund is dedicated to protecting women’s reproductive healthcare, addressing pay disparities, and the cost of child care, long-term care and education, by electing more Democratic women to Congress.”
EDW Action Fund, on its own site, edwactionfund.com
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
12 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
We’re dedicated to electing more Democratic women to Congress because it means:
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · edwactionfund.com
Heading as listed on edwactionfund.com ↗ (opens edwactionfund.com at this heading)
EDW Action Fund is committed to electing more Democratic women to Congress because representation matters.
History has shown that when more women serve in elected office, policies are more likely to reflect the needs of women, families, and communities.
From protecting reproductive freedom and expanding access to affordable health care to lowering costs, improving education, and investing in clean energy, Democratic women in Congress are leading the fight for policies that strengthen everyday lives.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · edwactionfund.com/about
Heading as listed on edwactionfund.com/about ↗ (opens edwactionfund.com/about at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Other PACs and committees | 2 | $923K · 100% |
| All recipients | 2 | $923K |
No recipient here is matched to a candidate with a state on record.
Bars drawn to $876K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 6 payments | $2.4M |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to PRO-CHOICE WOMEN · 9 payments | $1.6M |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 3 payments | $560K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · 2 payments |
The 15 largest sources are listed. Each as the committee named it on this line, $9.4M from 26 sources in all, with its largest individual donors, whose gifts it files here too. Individuals' gifts on this line are not itemized in the data the site holds, so the list need not add up to the row.
Total reported receipts $9,742,502
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3 contributions · 51% | $151,500 |
| 6 contributions · 31% | $91,500 |
| 1 contribution · 8.3% | $25,000 |
| 3 contributions · 3.8% | $11,500 |
| 1 contribution · 3.3% | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.3% | $10,000 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
Total reported disbursements $9,354,629
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $2,216,337 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
Total itemized disbursements $923,000
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 4 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3 payments · 9.4% of all spending | $876,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.5% of all spending | $47,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
$9.4M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $2.5M, June 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
EDW Action Fund is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (nonqualified). Its FEC record names Pro-Choice Majority 2024 as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
EDW Action Fund is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| $200K |
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 5 payments | $132K |
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION - COPE · 1 payment | $75K |
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to PRO-CHOICE MAJORITY 2024 · 2 payments | $55K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION · 2 payments | $45K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
$5.1M from 9 committees, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · 3 payments | $876K |
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to PRO-CHOICE MAJORITY 2024 · 1 payment | $47K |
$923K across 2 recipient committees, or 9.9% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 contribution · 50% of ranked | $150,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 6 contributions · 14% of ranked | $43,000 |
| 1 contribution · 8.3% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 1 contribution · 8.3% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 1 contribution · 8.3% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.3% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.3% of ranked | $10,000 |
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1 contribution · 50% of ranked | $150,000 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 6 contributions · 14% of ranked | $43,000 |
| 1 contribution · 8.3% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 1 contribution · 8.3% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 1 contribution · 8.3% of ranked | $25,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.3% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 2 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $10,000 |
| 1 contribution · 3.3% of ranked | $10,000 |
Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.