Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) › 2025–2026
Hybrid PAC (nonqualified)Washington, District of ColumbiaActive
Connected organization: Stop Kings
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00898379 · files monthly
“We are dedicated to electing Democrats, protecting our democracy, and holding Donald Trump and his MAGA Republicans accountable —”
The NO Kings PAC, on its own site, no-kings.io
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
12 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
We are dedicated to electing Democrats, protecting our democracy, and holding Donald Trump and his MAGA Republicans accountable —
because no one, not even the president, is above the law.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · no-kings.io
Heading as listed on no-kings.io ↗ (opens no-kings.io at this heading)
What it does: Reasserts that no president or former president is immune from criminal prosecution for actions taken in office.
Why it matters: SCOTUS’s Trump ruling creates a class of “American royalty.” We say: No kings. No exceptions.
Our Action: Demand passage of the No Kings Act and codify prosecutorial accountability for all federal officials.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · no-kings.io/platform
Heading as listed on no-kings.io/platform ↗ (opens no-kings.io/platform at this heading) · “I. End Presidential Immunity for Crimes” on no-kings.io/platform ↗ (opens no-kings.io/platform at this heading)
Require disclosure of foreign financial ties (emoluments)
Rein in abuse of emergency powers and IG firings
Our Action: Build public pressure for PODA as the comprehensive fix to the legal black holes Trump exploited.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · no-kings.io/platform
Heading as listed on no-kings.io/platform ↗ (opens no-kings.io/platform at this heading) · “II. Codify the Illegality of Trump-Era Abuses” on no-kings.io/platform ↗ (opens no-kings.io/platform at this heading)
What they do: ↗ (opens no-kings.io/platform at this heading)
Make it a felony to intimidate election officials or interfere with vote counting
Require campaigns to report foreign offers of election help (Trump-Helsinki, Don Jr. Trump Tower meeting)
Our Action: Demand legal safeguards against election interference — whether from a foreign dictator or an American president.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · no-kings.io/platform
Heading as listed on no-kings.io/platform ↗ (opens no-kings.io/platform at this heading) · “Platform” on no-kings.io/platform ↗ (opens no-kings.io/platform at this heading)
Ends unlimited emergency declarations without congressional approval
Our Action: Demand real-time accountability when a president invokes “emergency” powers to redirect funds, suspend laws, or launch military action.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · no-kings.io/platform
Heading as listed on no-kings.io/platform ↗ (opens no-kings.io/platform at this heading) · “Flagship Demands:” on no-kings.io/platform ↗ (opens no-kings.io/platform at this heading)
Prevents a president from firing special counsels investigating them without cause
Allows for judicial review and possible reinstatement
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · no-kings.io/platform
Heading as listed on no-kings.io/platform ↗ (opens no-kings.io/platform at this heading) · “Flagship Demands:” on no-kings.io/platform ↗ (opens no-kings.io/platform at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
No contributions itemized
Nothing loaded
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
No committee-to-committee receipts were itemized this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Super PAC (independent expenditure-only) · Connected to THE NO KINGS PAC · 2 payments | $260K |
$260K across 1 recipient committee, or 7.1% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
Each as the committee named it on this line.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 11 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 20,781 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $497.2K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $4,080,248
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4,579 contributions · 22% | $109,930 |
| 1,473 contributions · 6.9% | $34,293 |
Total reported disbursements $3,638,381
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $594,109 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$3.6M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.5M, Jul 1 – Dec 31, 2025.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
The NO Kings PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (nonqualified). Its FEC record names Stop Kings as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
The NO Kings PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| 1,162 contributions · 6.6% |
| $32,865 |
| 1,110 contributions · 4.8% | $23,840 |
| 954 contributions · 4.8% | $23,627 |
| 572 contributions · 3.4% | $17,046 |
| 734 contributions · 3.2% | $15,906 |
| 521 contributions · 2.7% | $13,599 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 18,575 contributions · 86% of ranked | $413,023 |
| Written instead of an employer · 521 contributions · 4.4% of ranked | $20,912 |
| 57 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $3,245 |
| 28 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $1,729 |
| 4 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $1,450 |
| 32 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $1,425 |
| 4 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $1,200 |
| 12 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $1,200 |
A further $17,550 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,714,506) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 18,060 contributions · 83% of ranked | $397,571 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 446 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $12,571 |
| 74 contributions · 0.7% of ranked | $3,574 |
| 71 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $3,012 |
| 49 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $2,870 |
| 10 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $2,450 |
| 7 contributions · 0.5% of ranked | $2,185 |
| 48 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $2,093 |
A further $17,515 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($2,714,506) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $2,400,669
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 225 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 56 payments · 46% of all spending | $1,676,100 |
| 2 payments · 7.1% of all spending | $260,000 |
| 90 payments · 3.5% of all spending | $125,887 |
| 8 payments · 3.2% of all spending | $116,016 |
| 25 payments · 2.3% of all spending | $82,618 |
| 18 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $65,331 |
| 16 payments · 1.6% of all spending | $58,500 |
| 4 payments · 0.3% of all spending | $10,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.