Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › IA-02 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, IA-02
Has not served in Congress
13 priorities from joemitchell.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
As your representative, I will fight for you—not corporations. That’s why I don’t take a dime of corporate PAC money. When elected officials are funded by special interests, it’s the public who gets left behind.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · joemitchell.com/issues
Heading as listed on joemitchell.com/issues ↗ (opens joemitchell.com/issues at this heading)
Twelve years in the House and twelve years in the Senate (Twenty-four years total) is more than enough time to pass meaningful legislation. It’s time to get rid of entrenched bureaucrats and bring fresh ideas to Washington. New voices and perspectives are essential to keeping our democracy responsive and effective.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · joemitchell.com/issues
Heading as listed on joemitchell.com/issues ↗ (opens joemitchell.com/issues at this heading)
Members of Congress should be focused on serving their constituents, not profiteering from their insider information on the stock market. I support a full ban on stock and prediction market trading for members of Congress. Iowans deserve leaders they can trust to put Iowa first.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · joemitchell.com/issues
Heading as listed on joemitchell.com/issues ↗ (opens joemitchell.com/issues at this heading)
Americans deserve immigration policies that put them first. By securing our borders, deporting criminal illegal immigrants, and reforming our immigration laws, we can ensure that Americans—not the Third World—have access to the American Dream. I support a temporary ban on H-1B visas and a long-term plan that ensures Americans are prioritized not only on U.S. soil but also in the global labor market.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · joemitchell.com/issues
Heading as listed on joemitchell.com/issues ↗ (opens joemitchell.com/issues at this heading)
We should use every tool our nation has at its disposal including natural gas, oil, nuclear, clean coal, hydro, solar, and wind power to lower costs and strengthen American energy independence. By investing in a diverse energy mix, we can create jobs, reduce reliance on foreign energy sources, and better protect consumers from price volatility and supply disruptions.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · joemitchell.com/issues
Heading as listed on joemitchell.com/issues ↗ (opens joemitchell.com/issues at this heading)
Years of wage stagnation have weakened working-class financial security even as productivity and corporate profits have risen. I will fight to prioritize American workers and keep prices low by keeping jobs in America and strengthening antitrust enforcement.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · joemitchell.com/issues
Heading as listed on joemitchell.com/issues ↗ (opens joemitchell.com/issues at this heading)
We need to lower costs, increase transparency, and expand consumer choice while preserving key protections from the ACA. Prescription drug and insulin prices for Americans should be comparable to those of other developed countries. Reform must also enforce price transparency to drive competition, ensure subsidies go directly to patients to remove hidden costs in the drug supply chain, and expand access to over-the-counter medications.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · joemitchell.com/issues
Heading as listed on joemitchell.com/issues ↗ (opens joemitchell.com/issues at this heading)
The skyrocketing price of homes has made the American Dream unattainable for most Americans. Due to over-regulation and a shortage of affordable homes for sale, the median first time home buyer is now over 40 years of age. De-regulating the homebuilding industry will allow more builders to build more homes at a much lower cost.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · joemitchell.com/issues
Heading as listed on joemitchell.com/issues ↗ (opens joemitchell.com/issues at this heading)
Hardworking Americans and small businesses deserve a tax system that rewards work, not punishes it. I will cut taxes for middle-class families and job creators, simplify the tax code, and help people keep more of what they earn to grow the economy and create good-paying jobs. We must end years of wage stagnation that have hurt working families despite rising productivity and profits. I will prioritize American workers by keeping jobs in America, strengthening antitrust enforcement, and keeping prices low.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · joemitchell.com/issues
Heading as listed on joemitchell.com/issues ↗ (opens joemitchell.com/issues at this heading)
American farmers are the backbone of our economy and food security, and Washington must start treating them that way. Cutting burdensome regulations, expanding access to global markets, and boosting domestic fertilizer production will ensure family farms can thrive for generations.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · joemitchell.com/issues
Heading as listed on joemitchell.com/issues ↗ (opens joemitchell.com/issues at this heading)
Our K–12 education system should develop the fundamentals of reading, writing, math, and critical thinking while empowering parents to decide what’s best for their children’s education. Colleges and universities must be held accountable for how they spend taxpayer dollars, with a greater focus on affordability, workforce readiness, and measurable outcomes. Public institutions should prioritize access for in-state students, ensuring Iowa families benefit first, while federal funding should be tied to transparency, cost control, and real return on investment for students.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · joemitchell.com/issues
Heading as listed on joemitchell.com ↗ (opens joemitchell.com at this heading)
I believe there are two genders—male and female. Women and girls deserve a level playing field in sports, free from biological males, with policies that protect fairness, safety, and equal opportunity so female athletes can succeed on their merits. I oppose sex-change surgeries for minors, will fight to ban the use of federal tax dollars for these procedures, and will work to keep biological men out of women’s bathrooms.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · joemitchell.com/issues
Heading as listed on joemitchell.com/issues ↗ (opens joemitchell.com/issues at this heading)
FEC filings, Jul 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00918979
81¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 7 reports ($2.4M of $2.9M). Cash on hand went from $405.9K on Sep 30, 2025 to $545.5K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $407,555 | $1,672 | $405,883 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $301,508 | $130,914 | $576,477 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $627,083 | $324,823 | $878,738 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026 | $224,678 | $225,750 | $877,666 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $377,769 | $359,871 | $895,564 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $745,215 | $771,961 | $868,818 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $232,261 | $555,546 | $545,534 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
No endorsements page
Advanced · 24,643 votes (61%) · 1 of 2 · Full results ↗
Won · 112,230 votes (49%) · 1 of 4 · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Latest poll · Emerson College, Oct 14, 2026 · too few nonpartisan polls for a lead
A poll is a snapshot, not a forecast.
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 2,892 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.1M.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 175 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $512.4K. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
Each loan as the campaign’s report through Oct 14, 2026 lists it, with what is still owed. A loan from an earlier cycle can appear here, and one repaid in full drops off the report, so the list need not add up to the row.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 2 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 3 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $34.9K.
Total reported receipts $2,916,069
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
25% of the money placed by state came from inside Iowa: $285.4K of $1.1M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 172 contributions · 25% | $285,435 |
| 350 contributions · 22% | $244,391 |
| 521 contributions · 11% | $127,983 |
| 534 contributions · 5.7% | $64,353 |
| 112 contributions · 3.7% | $42,273 |
| 141 contributions · 3.4% | $38,972 |
| 28 contributions · 3.2% | $36,754 |
| 32 contributions · 2.5% | $28,231 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 42 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 2,342 contributions · 34% of ranked | $369,200 |
| Written instead of an employer · 100 contributions · 6.6% of ranked | $71,704 |
| Written instead of an employer · 18 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $38,829 |
| 2 contributions · 1.1% of ranked | $12,000 |
| 2 contributions · 0.9% of ranked | $9,582 |
| 2 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $7,066 |
| 1 contribution · 0.6% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 1 contribution · 0.6% of ranked | $7,000 |
A further $36,054 came from donors whose answer names no employer (blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($546,607) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $125,132 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $1,479,482
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 841 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
23 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $23,270 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3 payments · 21% of all spending | $494,582 |
| 5 payments · 6.7% of all spending | $159,962 |
| 4 payments · 3.8% of all spending | $89,936 |
| 8 payments · 3.3% of all spending | $77,561 |
| 1 payment · 3.2% of all spending | $75,000 |
| 18 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $59,239 |
| 13 payments · 2.1% of all spending | $48,699 |
| 45 payments · 1.5% of all spending | $36,544 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 2,342 contributions · 34% of ranked | $369,200 |
| 41 contributions · 11% of ranked | $121,972 |
| 37 contributions · 7.7% of ranked | $84,841 |
| 26 contributions · 6.8% of ranked | $74,225 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 18 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $38,829 |
| 12 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $25,724 |
| 20 contributions · 2% of ranked | $22,187 |
| 19 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $20,152 |
A further $36,054 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($546,607) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.