Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › Hybrid PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00879221 · files monthly
“Crush MAGA is dedicated to fighting against Trump’s presidency and defeating any MAGA Republicans who uphold his dangerous rhetoric.
As an affiliate organization of Save Democracy PAC, we know exactly how important it is to fight back against Trumpism in both the White House and the halls of Congress. That’s why we’re laser-focused on making sure Democrats in key races have what they need to win against MAGA Republicans.”
Crush Maga PAC, on its own site, crushmaga.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
2 priorities from the committee’s own site, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Crush MAGA is dedicated to fighting against Trump’s presidency and defeating any MAGA Republicans who uphold his dangerous rhetoric.
As an affiliate organization of Save Democracy PAC, we know exactly how important it is to fight back against Trumpism in both the White House and the halls of Congress.
That’s why we’re laser-focused on making sure Democrats in key races have what they need to win against MAGA Republicans.
See some of our favorite ads from previous elections here:
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · crushmaga.org
Heading as listed on crushmaga.org ↗ (opens crushmaga.org at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
Spending against candidates is drawn on its own bar and left out of the support totals.
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 3 | $12.5K · 14% |
| Other party committees | 2 | $40K · 44% |
| Other PACs and committees | 3 | $38K · 42% |
| All recipients | 8 | $90.5K |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| North Carolina | 1 | $5K |
| New York | 1 | $5K |
| Arizona | 1 | $2.5K |
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (nonqualified) · Connected to SD PAC · 4 payments |
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 35,693 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $660.5K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Total reported receipts $3,708,215
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 6,261 contributions · 17% | $114,513 |
| 2,800 contributions · 9.1% | $59,968 |
Total reported disbursements $3,702,890
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
These are the payments the committee itemized to vendors, staff and other committees. Its $1,969,188 in independent expenditures is filed separately, against the candidate each was about, so it is counted in the split above and listed by candidate below, not here.
$3.7M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $1.3M, July 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period. Numbered lines mark the elections that drew the most independent spending. Each expenditure counts toward the next election on its seat after the day it was made, and a seat is named when it drew at least a tenth of that spending.
No lobbying disclosures matched
Crush Maga PAC is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a Hybrid PAC (qualified). Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
Crush Maga PAC is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
Bars drawn to $28K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
| $1.3M |
$1.3M from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Hybrid PAC (qualified) · 3 payments | $28K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $25K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $15K |
| PAC (qualified) · 1 payment | $5K |
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to ELECT DIVERSE DEMOCRATS PAC · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to DAN GOLDMAN NEW YORK VICTORY · 1 payment | $5K |
| House campaign committee · 1 payment | $2.5K |
$90.5K across 8 recipient committees, or 2.4% of everything this committee reports spending.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| 1,477 contributions · 6.4% |
| $42,157 |
| 1,457 contributions · 6.3% | $41,719 |
| 2,288 contributions · 5.2% | $34,380 |
| 2,087 contributions · 5% | $33,352 |
| 1,186 contributions · 4.3% | $28,623 |
| 1,197 contributions · 3.1% | $20,672 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 31,077 contributions · 89% of ranked | $550,558 |
| Written instead of an employer · 729 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $16,230 |
| 1 contribution · 0.3% of ranked | $2,000 |
| 128 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $1,578 |
| 18 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $1,575 |
| 34 contributions · 0.2% of ranked | $1,152 |
| 35 contributions · 0.2% of ranked | $1,075 |
| 2 contributions · 0.2% of ranked | $1,000 |
A further $42,766 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,800,076) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 30,391 contributions · 87% of ranked | $537,674 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 668 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $11,880 |
| 98 contributions · 0.6% of ranked | $3,815 |
| 85 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $2,693 |
| 32 contributions · 0.4% of ranked | $2,280 |
| 45 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $2,005 |
| 1 contribution · 0.3% of ranked | $2,000 |
| 29 contributions · 0.3% of ranked | $1,764 |
A further $42,346 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($1,800,076) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Total itemized disbursements $1,600,250
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 296 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
1 payment was reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $5,832 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 77 payments · 20% of all spending | $733,108 |
| 1 payment · 12% of all spending | $452,000 |
| 28 payments · 4.8% of all spending | $179,018 |
| 112 payments · 2.5% of all spending | $93,095 |
| 20 payments · 1% of all spending | $36,129 |
| 3 payments · 0.8% of all spending | $28,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $25,000 |
| 2 payments · 0.4% of all spending | $15,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.