Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › CA-41 race › 2025–2026
D Democratic nominee for U.S. House, CA-41
Representative since 2003
The same platforms’ other accounts, such as a congressional office’s or an earlier campaign’s.
2 priorities from voteforlinda.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
As a leader in Congress, Linda Sánchez is a tireless advocate lowering costs for California’s working families. She is committed to strengthening our middle class, providing a safe and quality education for our children, and encouraging economic growth and job creation through innovation and manufacturing.
The first woman member of IBEW elected to Congress and a co-founder of the Labor Caucus, Linda is dedicated to fighting for California’s workers. She champions policies to ensure that workers are safe on the job from both workplace accidents and employer intimidation and retaliation. Workers deserve good wages that help them afford to live here, and the certainty of knowing they’ll be able to retire with dignity.
Linda serves as a senior member on the House Committee on Ways and Means where she works on tax, trade, retirement security, and health care issues. She’s passed legislation to prevent health insurance companies from making women pay more for the same insurance that men get, and she’s fighting to pass legislation to make child care more affordable for working families.
As the top Democrat on the Trade Subcommittee, she is committed to level the playing field for American workers and bring jobs back from overseas. She’s fought to end Trump’s illegal tariffs which raised costs for everyone and harmed domestic manufacturing.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · voteforlinda.com/meet-linda
Trump’s administration has been lawless in every way: starting an illegal war that has driven up the cost of gas; instituting illegal tariffs that have driven up the costs of homes, cars and groceries; and gutting health care for millions of working families. Linda has been leading the charge to oppose Trump and protect Californians. She has voted to impeach Trump and been on the front lines opposing his cruel immigration policies.
Trump has turned ICE into his own personal secret police and must be stopped. Linda has refused to fund ICE’s reign of terror over our communities and fought for serious reform: body cameras to keep them accountable, rigorous hiring standards including background checks, preventing them from wearing masks to hide their identities, reinstating the sensitive locations policy to stop ICE from raiding churches and hospitals, and more.
She previously led the House Ethics Committee, where she fought to hold her colleagues accountable – no one is above the law. She supports a congressional stock ban because no member of Congress should be getting rich off of insider trading while Americans struggle to afford groceries.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · voteforlinda.com/meet-linda
99% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 8 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Ways and Means
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Sánchez’s 74 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00384057
$1.00 has been spent for every dollar raised across 9 reports ($1.9M of $1.9M). Cash on hand went from $443.1K on Mar 31, 2025 to $420.8K on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $180,097 | $162,748 | $443,137 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $198,445 | $140,402 | $501,180 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $254,191 | $122,427 | $632,943 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $175,412 | $202,908 | $605,447 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $393,474 | $277,278 | $721,643 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through May 13, 2026 | $123,477 | $186,765 | $658,355 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $277,694 | $520,303 | $415,746 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $282,414 | $235,671 | $462,488 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $12,985 | $54,673 | $420,799 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
70 endorsers listed on Linda T. Sánchez’s own campaign site: 1 party, 50 officials, 11 unions, 8 organizations.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
“I’m honored to have earned the endorsement of the California Democratic Party,” said Congresswoman Sánchez. “This support affirms our work to lower costs for working families, protect health care for all Californians and stand up for our communities. Despite constant threats from the Trump administration targeting our state, we’ll keep fighting for California’s values while working to build a blue wave in November to take back the majority.”
U.S. Senator
U.S. Senator
“Congresswoman Sánchez is a proven leader who has spent her career fighting for the people she represents,” said Senators Padilla and Schiff. “From leading on immigration reform to standing up for a fair tax code that works for everyone, she never backs down from tough fights – she takes them head-on. Congress needs more champions for working families like her.”
Democratic Leader
Democratic Whip
Democratic Caucus Chairman
U.S. Representative
U.S. Representative
U.S. Representative
California Federation of Labor Unions
“Earning the California Federation of Labor’s endorsement means a great deal to me,” said Congresswoman Sánchez. “It affirms my commitment to California’s workers and their families. As the Trump administration continues to target unions and attack collective bargaining rights, I’m proud to stand with my union brothers and sisters and will keep fighting for fair wages, strong worker protections and the dignity every worker deserves.”
Los Angeles/Orange Counties Building and Construction Trades Council
Association of Orange County Deputy Sheriffs
“Earning the endorsement of the Association of Orange County Deputy Sheriffs during Police Week, when we honor the courage and sacrifice of these brave men and women, makes this recognition even more meaningful,” said Congresswoman Sánchez. “Their bravery deserves our deepest respect, and their trust means everything to me. I will always fight to give them the resources and support they need to protect the communities we serve.”
Advanced · 61,651 votes (38%) · 1 of 4 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 636 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.4M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 395 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $316.9K.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The largest of the sources is listed. In all, 1 transfer was filed this cycle, totaling $11.5K.
Total reported receipts $1,898,188
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
33% of the money placed by state came from inside California: $104.4K of $316.9K.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 198 contributions · 33% | $104,361 |
| 64 contributions · 24% | $74,477 |
| 29 contributions · 10% | $31,750 |
| 24 contributions · 8.4% | $26,550 |
| 17 contributions · 7.9% | $25,000 |
| 5 contributions · 2% | $6,250 |
| 6 contributions · 1.9% | $6,000 |
| 6 contributions · 1.7% | $5,250 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 30 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 5 contributions · 4.5% of ranked | $14,000 |
| Written instead of an employer · 43 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $11,280 |
| Written instead of an employer · 26 contributions · 3.4% of ranked | $10,692 |
| 3 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $7,500 |
| 2 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $7,000 |
| 2 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $7,000 |
A further $5,000 came from donors whose answer names no employer (N/A, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($31,782) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $12,718 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $1,659,275
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,058 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
57 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $262,027 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 7 payments · 14% of all spending | $260,569 |
| 9 payments · 14% of all spending | $260,304 |
| 7 payments · 12% of all spending | $225,033 |
| 18 payments · 12% of all spending | $223,263 |
| 20 payments · 7.6% of all spending | $144,152 |
| 17 payments · 4.4% of all spending | $83,750 |
| 1 payment · 3.5% of all spending | $67,500 |
| 72 payments · 3.2% of all spending | $61,652 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 26 contributions · 11% of ranked | $34,600 |
| 34 contributions · 9.8% of ranked | $30,800 |
| 16 contributions · 9.7% of ranked | $30,500 |
| 21 contributions · 5.3% of ranked | $16,845 |
| 12 contributions · 5.2% of ranked | $16,250 |
| 29 contributions · 4.6% of ranked | $14,500 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 43 contributions · 3.6% of ranked | $11,280 |
| 8 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $10,500 |
A further $1,500 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (blank), so it is not ranked. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($31,782) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.