Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this committee’s profile from its FEC filings.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
PACs › PAC (qualified) › 2025–2026
PAC (qualified)Lobbyist/registrant PACTrade associationArlington, VirginiaActive
Connected organization: National Association of Insurance & Financial Advisors
Political fund of National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors
FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026 · FEC bulk filing data · committee C00005249 · files monthly
“NAIFA empowers financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.”
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors, the organization this committee is the political fund of, belong.naifa.org
Quoted from the committee's site, or its sponsor's or funder's where its own says nothing. The statement is filed under topics from a fixed list, chosen by AI models when two of three agree; which side it takes is in its own words.
6 priorities from the site of National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors, the organization this committee is the political fund of, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · belong.naifa.org/mission
NAIFA empowers financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · belong.naifa.org/about-naifa
Heading as listed on belong.naifa.org/mission ↗ (opens belong.naifa.org/mission at this heading)
NAIFA’s advocacy strategy is comprehensive, coordinated, and rooted at the federal, interstate, and state levels.
No other association matches NAIFA’s reach, relationships, or results when it comes to protecting financial professionals and the clients they serve.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · belong.naifa.org/advocate
Heading as listed on belong.naifa.org/advocate ↗ (opens belong.naifa.org/advocate at this heading)
NAIFA is the only association representing the full spectrum of financial service professionals with a seat at every table in Washington.
From risk protection to retirement planning, our advocacy shapes the policies that define our industry’s future.
We engage all three branches of the federal government: legislatively, through direct contact with all 535 members of Congress via our PAC, grassroots network, and Congressional Conference; executively, by influencing regulatory rulemaking; and judicially, by defending our members’ interests through federal litigation when needed.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · belong.naifa.org/advocate
Heading as listed on belong.naifa.org/advocate ↗ (opens belong.naifa.org/advocate at this heading)
NAIFA is actively involved with the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) and the National Council of Insurance Legislators (NCOIL) long before policies become law.
We serve on key working groups and subcommittees, provide expert testimony, and submit detailed comment letters to shape model legislation at its earliest stages.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · belong.naifa.org/advocate
Heading as listed on belong.naifa.org/advocate ↗ (opens belong.naifa.org/advocate at this heading)
NAIFA is the only producers’ association with a consistent presence in all 50 states.
Our state chapters, 50 PACs, and grassroots leaders ensure we have a voice in every statehouse.
From State Legislative Days to regulatory roundtables, NAIFA drives engagement where it matters most.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · belong.naifa.org/advocate
Heading as listed on belong.naifa.org/advocate ↗ (opens belong.naifa.org/advocate at this heading)
Each part reads different filings, so counts and totals can differ.
Direct PAC contributions and independent expenditures explicitly reported as support, by the party of the candidate they went to.
| Party of the candidate | Candidates | Direct | Independent | Amount | Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 107 | $635,300 | $0 | $635,300 | 55% |
| Democratic | 80 | $473,500 | $0 | $473,500 | 41% |
| Other or unresolved | 14 | $42,000 | $0 | $42,000 | 3.6% |
| Shown support | 201 | $1,150,800 | $0 | $1,150,800 | 100% |
Contributions are reported money, not endorsements; a PAC giving to both parties is common.
Every contribution on line 23 of the committee’s own Schedule B, which is the filing its summary totals are built from. That line covers federal candidates, party committees and other political committees alike, so a super PAC funding other super PACs appears here rather than under candidate giving.
| Recipient | Count | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Democratic candidates | 80 | $473.5K · 36% |
| Republican candidates | 106 | $623.8K · 48% |
| Other or unresolved candidates | 18 | $73.5K · 5.7% |
| Democratic party committees | 2 | $60K · 4.6% |
| Republican party committees | 2 | $45K · 3.5% |
| Other PACs and committees | 4 | $22.5K · 1.7% |
| All recipients | 212 | $1.3M |
| State | Candidates | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| California | 17 | $123K |
| New York | 14 | $103.5K |
| Pennsylvania | 8 | $57.5K |
| Texas | 10 | $48K |
| Florida | 9 | $44K |
| New Jersey | 8 | $43K |
| Virginia | 8 | $42.5K |
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 6,825 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $812.3K. FEC contributor lists are public records and cannot be used for commercial solicitation.
Each as the committee named it on this line.
The largest of the committees is listed. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total this committee reports.
Total reported receipts $1,386,079
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 679 contributions · 11% | $91,238 |
| 585 contributions · 11% | $88,880 |
Total reported disbursements $1,531,732
Every dollar this committee reported spending this cycle, split by the lines it reports against. Open a line to see who was actually paid on it. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Total itemized disbursements $1,314,902
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 462 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
$1.5M spent from Jan 2025 to Oct 2026. Most in one report: $198K, September 2026.
The running total of what the committee’s FEC reports say it spent, independent expenditures included, with a point at the end of each report. The line is straight between reports because a report gives one total for its whole period.
No lobbying disclosures matched
National Association of Insurance & Financial Advisors Political Action Comm is registered with the Federal Election Commission as a PAC (qualified). It is a lobbyist/registrant PAC. Its FEC record names National Association of Insurance & Financial Advisors as an affiliate. Official FEC summary: Federal Election Commission committee record.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the committee’s or its sponsor’s; the record marking is ours.
National Association of Insurance & Financial Advisors Political Action Comm is matched to organization records using the FEC committee identity, structured identifiers, and corroborated organization data.
| Massachusetts | 5 | $40K |
|---|
The largest 8 of 48 states.
Bars drawn to $30K, the largest gift total here. 2025–2026 filings.
Candidate contribution rows come from candidate committee Schedule A filings, the same rows the party chart above counts.
Money moving between this committee and other committees, matched on FEC committee ID rather than the name each filing was typed under. Both sides exclude memo entries. The figures here count each committee once, from the itemized transfers read for this section, so they will not match the payment counts under Who this PAC gave to.
Committees that reported giving to this one on their own Schedule A filings, grouped by the giver’s committee ID.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| PAC (qualified) · Connected to NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY · 2 payments | $10K |
$10K from 1 committee, counting every itemized receipt this cycle.
Disbursements this committee itemized to another committee: candidate contributions, party transfers and payments alike, not contributions only.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to YOUNG VICTORY COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $30K |
| Party committee (qualified) · Connected to COLE COMBINED COMMITTEE · 1 payment | $15K |
| 1 payment | $15K |
| Senate campaign committee · 1 payment | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to SEEC VICTORY FUND · 4 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to EMMER VICTORY COMMITTEE · 2 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · 4 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to TEAM HILL · 3 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to GARBARINO VICTORY FUND · 3 payments | $10K |
| House campaign committee · Connected to SMITH VICTORY · 3 payments | $10K |
$1.3M across 215 recipient committees, or 85% of everything this committee reports spending. The largest 12 are shown.
Built from FEC Schedule A and Schedule B filings for the selected cycle. A committee only appears here if the money was itemized under its FEC committee ID.
| 651 contributions · 11% | $88,804 |
| 452 contributions · 8% | $65,381 |
| 394 contributions · 6.2% | $50,135 |
| 134 contributions · 3.6% | $29,600 |
| 214 contributions · 3.2% | $26,052 |
| 267 contributions · 3% | $24,372 |
By the state each contributor wrote on the filing. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line together, so one committee or organization transfer can account for a whole state. Contributors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized and cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 234 contributions · 6.2% of ranked | $38,847 |
| 174 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $20,618 |
| 244 contributions · 3.1% of ranked | $19,318 |
| 102 contributions · 2.5% of ranked | $15,863 |
| 152 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $14,640 |
| 27 contributions · 1.8% of ranked | $11,667 |
| 32 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $10,742 |
| 67 contributions · 1.7% of ranked | $10,689 |
Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($447,938) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| 1,188 contributions · 14% of ranked | $111,912 |
| 932 contributions · 14% of ranked | $111,905 |
| 455 contributions · 8.8% of ranked | $71,077 |
| 473 contributions · 6.8% of ranked | $55,133 |
| 72 contributions · 3.5% of ranked | $28,320 |
| 153 contributions · 3% of ranked | $24,562 |
| 220 contributions · 2.1% of ranked | $17,269 |
| 115 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $15,699 |
Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized receipts grouped by the words contributors filed. The FEC aggregates every Schedule A line here, so committee and organization money sits alongside individuals; this is not an industry classification. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($447,938) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 2 payments · 2% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 2 payments · 2% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 2 payments · 2% of all spending | $30,000 |
| 3 payments · 1.8% of all spending | $27,602 |
| 1 payment · 1% of all spending | $15,000 |
| 1 payment · 1% of all spending | $15,000 |
| 1 payment · 0.7% of all spending | $10,000 |
| 4 payments · 0.7% of all spending | $10,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.