Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Loading this candidate’s profile from the FEC filings and campaign records.
Where They Stand is a nonpartisan guide to everyone running for Congress: their money, their own words and how incumbents voted. Find your ballot →
Candidates › MN-06 race › 2025–2026
R Republican nominee for U.S. House, MN-06
Representative since 2015
10 priorities from emmerforcongress.com, in the order they are listed there. Every heading and the text under it is copied exactly, as one passage for each page it is from, and links to that place on the page; hover a source to see which passage it opens.
Tom is focused on fighting the affordability crisis to restore energy independence and provide immediate economic relief to Minnesota families struggling with the high costs of groceries, gas, and electricity. Tom played a critical role in getting President Trump’s working families tax cut signed into law which makes President Trump’s tax cuts permanent for families and businesses, includes policies like no tax on tips and no tax on overtime, and provides new tax relief for seniors.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · emmerforcongress.com/principles-key-issues
Heading as listed on emmerforcongress.com ↗ (opens emmerforcongress.com at this heading)
Tom is a strong supporter of President Trump’s peace through strength policies. Whether here in the United States or our service members abroad, Tom has consistently voted to restore our military strength and give our troops the resources they need to protect our country at home and abroad. Tom is also working to hold blue states and blue cities accountable for their reckless policies that have turned major cities into war zones.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · emmerforcongress.com/principles-key-issues
Tom is, and always has been, dedicated to reducing Washington’s runaway spending. Americans know how to spend their money better than Washington bureaucrats. Tom has taken action to decrease our growing debt and ensure taxpayer dollars are spent responsibly. He will continue looking for ways to cut waste, find more reforms, and advocate for sticking to the “regular order” process of appropriations rather than resort to bloated omnibus bills.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · emmerforcongress.com/principles-key-issues
Tom believes only Americans should vote in American elections. It’s why he’s worked to hold the State of Minnesota and the Walz Administration accountable over numerous reports of non-citizens voting or receiving mail-in ballots. Tom supports commonsense policies in Congress, such as the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act to require a proof of citizenship before registering to vote and to mandate states like Minnesota remove ineligible voters off their voter rolls.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · emmerforcongress.com/principles-key-issues
Heading as listed on emmerforcongress.com ↗ (opens emmerforcongress.com at this heading)
Tom led the charge to pass the strongest border security bill in decades (H.R. 2) that will help stop the flow of fentanyl, gangs, and terrorist threats into Minnesota and our country. Tom successfully worked to pass the Laken Riley Act, which is now law, to ensure illegal aliens who commit crimes in the U.S. are quickly and permanently deported from our country.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · emmerforcongress.com/principles-key-issues
Tom is working to bring education back into the hands of parents, not radical teachers’ unions. Tom is putting the needs of parents and students first by championing school choice policies, empowering local school boards, and working to end the U.S. Department of Education.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · emmerforcongress.com
Heading as listed on emmerforcongress.com ↗ (opens emmerforcongress.com at this heading)
Tom is working to honor and support our men and women in blue by successfully funding mental health programs for local police departments and sheriff’s offices and ensuring local and state law enforcement have the resources to keep us safe.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · emmerforcongress.com
Heading as listed on emmerforcongress.com ↗ (opens emmerforcongress.com at this heading)
Tom is Congress’s leading crypto and financial privacy expert. His landmark education to ban a Chinese Communist Party-style digital surveillance tool, a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC), passed through the House of Representatives in 2024. Tom is working with President Trump to make cryptocurrency and digital assets obtainable for the everyday American while upholding the core values of financial freedom and privacy that we hold dear.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · emmerforcongress.com/principles-key-issues
Tom believes that funding to improve roads, bridges, and highways should be spent on just that – improving roads, bridges, and highways. That’s why he helped secure federal funding for critical road and wastewater projects to ensure Minnesota’s Sixth Congressional District continues to attract investments, business, and families. He has also authored legislation to prioritize funding for interchange and intersection safety.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · emmerforcongress.com/principles-key-issues
Unfortunately, American communities continue to suffer from a severe mental health crisis. Tom is committed to providing mental health resources for our children, law enforcement, and rural communities. In Congress, Tom has led the charge to provide funding and greater access to care for vulnerable populations.
source ↗ (opens the page at this passage) · emmerforcongress.com/principles-key-issues
99% of their votes went with their party’s majority; they broke with it 7 times in the 119th Congress.
House Committee on Financial Services
Matching this candidate against the House and Senate voting records…
The CRS policy areas of Emmer’s 58 substantive sponsored measures, Congresses 117, 118, 119; the figure is how many fall in each. Sponsorship indicates legislative focus, not every policy position. GovInfo source ↗
FEC filings, Jan 1, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 · Official FEC bulk data · committee C00545749
88¢ of every dollar raised has been spent across 9 reports ($9.6M of $10.9M). Cash on hand went from $2.6M on Mar 31, 2025 to $3M on Oct 14, 2026.
| Report | Raised in the period | Spent in the period | Cash on hand at its close |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2025 through Mar 31, 2025 | $1,978,058 | $1,072,440 | $2,594,070 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2025 through Jun 30, 2025 | $1,925,406 | $721,747 | $3,797,728 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2025 through Sep 30, 2025 | $1,510,080 | $570,863 | $4,736,946 |
| YEAR-END 2025 through Dec 31, 2025 | $1,350,383 | $1,142,197 | $4,945,131 |
| APRIL QUARTERLY 2026 through Mar 31, 2026 | $1,545,860 | $1,902,317 | $4,588,674 |
| JULY QUARTERLY 2026 through Jun 30, 2026 | $1,321,794 | $1,374,877 | $4,535,592 |
| PRE-PRIMARY 2026 through Jul 22, 2026 | $154,483 | $194,068 | $4,496,007 |
| OCTOBER QUARTERLY 2026 through Sep 30, 2026 | $955,951 | $1,769,973 | $3,681,986 |
| PRE-GENERAL 2026 through Oct 14, 2026 | $119,532 | $830,273 | $2,971,245 |
Each report’s own period, as filed with the FEC; a report filed again counts once, as its latest copy.
Money moved in from the candidate’s other authorized committees, such as a joint fundraising committee. It was raised once and is reported again here on arrival. The 4 largest sources by total given are listed. In all, 40 transfers were filed this cycle, totaling $4.9M.
1 endorser listed on Tom Emmer’s own campaign site.
This is the campaign's claim, checked by an editor against its page; the endorsers have not confirmed it to us. Each name opens the campaign’s page with that name highlighted.
Advanced · 53,088 votes (81%) · 1 of 3 · Full results ↗
Election not held yet · Full results ↗
Every contest for this seat that named this candidate, most recent last; a result is shown once the race is called. Election dates and results from civicAPI (civicapi.org). civicAPI aggregates results from Secretaries of State and equivalent election bodies, and makes its own race calls. civicapi.org ↗
Official FEC filing record for the current cycle. The priorities they publish are quoted from their own site, in their order.
Statements are quoted from these pages exactly. Headings, order and wording are the campaign’s; the record marking is ours.
The 12 largest committees by total given are listed. In all, 866 committee contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $2.5M. Counted from the givers' own filings, which can run above the total the campaign itself reports.
A donor who gave several times appears once. The 12 largest donors by total given are listed. In all, 42,701 itemized contributions were filed this cycle, totaling $1.9M.
Total reported receipts $10,861,547
Every dollar the committee reported receiving this cycle, split by the source the FEC filing attributes it to. Open a source marked + to see who gave. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
Loading the map
Tap or hover over a state, or focus the map and use the arrow keys, to read its total. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom.
12% of the money placed by state came from inside Minnesota: $224.9K of $1.9M.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 4,228 contributions · 13% | $254,095 |
| 5,193 contributions · 12% | $235,148 |
| 979 contributions · 12% | $224,907 |
| 1,300 contributions · 11% | $205,859 |
| 5,132 contributions · 6.3% | $122,863 |
| 1,903 contributions · 6% | $116,046 |
| 509 contributions · 3.4% | $65,318 |
| 904 contributions · 2.6% | $50,037 |
By the state each donor wrote on the filing, across 53 states and territories. Donors who have given $200 or less this cycle are not itemized, so they cannot be placed on a map. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total.
| Employer as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an employer · 1,150 contributions · 12% of ranked | $104,861 |
| Written instead of an employer · 416 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $41,846 |
| 8 contributions · 3% of ranked | $25,500 |
| 8 contributions · 2.9% of ranked | $24,632 |
| Written instead of an employer · 18 contributions · 2% of ranked | $17,100 |
| 25 contributions · 1.9% of ranked | $16,350 |
| 4 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $12,000 |
| 4 contributions · 1.4% of ranked | $11,500 |
A further $910,668 came from donors whose answer names no employer (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 employer spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($791,683) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.
Money groups spent on their own, not through a campaign. Each ad is filed against the candidate it names, so money attacking an opponent shows on the opponent’s row. Open a candidate to see who spent it.
The campaign also refunded $17,281 in contributions, which the categories below do not include.
Total itemized disbursements $7,786,930
Every itemized payment the committee reported this cycle, sorted by what it said each one was for. The categories are ours; the wording they are matched against is the committee’s own. Open a category to read the filed descriptions and who was paid. FEC filings through Oct 14, 2026.
All 1,751 itemized payments filed this cycle. Spending below the itemization threshold is not filed line by line.
60 payments were reported as a lump sum, such as a card or payroll bill, with the detail filed underneath as memo entries. Those entries, $607,269 in all, are counted under the payee and purpose they name rather than under the processor that was paid. The total is the same either way.
| Name | Amount |
|---|---|
| 3 payments · 18% of all spending | $1,750,000 |
| 20 payments · 12% of all spending | $1,175,856 |
| 20 payments · 10% of all spending | $955,867 |
| 180 payments · 8.6% of all spending | $823,998 |
| 13 payments · 2.9% of all spending | $273,022 |
| 12 payments · 2.7% of all spending | $256,063 |
| 8 payments · 2.7% of all spending | $255,222 |
| 1 payment · 2.6% of all spending | $250,000 |
The people, firms and committees paid the most, across every kind of payment. Each share is of everything the committee reported spending this cycle, not only the itemized payments above. A payee that is itself a committee links to its own profile.
| Occupation as filed | Amount |
|---|---|
| Written instead of an occupation · 37,122 contributions · 44% of ranked | $793,310 |
| 194 contributions · 4.9% of ranked | $87,326 |
| 102 contributions · 3.3% of ranked | $58,134 |
| 176 contributions · 2.8% of ranked | $50,767 |
| 19 contributions · 2.6% of ranked | $46,882 |
| 60 contributions · 2.4% of ranked | $43,530 |
| Written instead of an occupation · 419 contributions · 2.3% of ranked | $41,924 |
| 92 contributions · 2% of ranked | $34,907 |
A further $120,511 came from donors whose answer names no occupation (None, blank), so it is not ranked. Ranked from the largest 200 of 201 occupation spellings filed; each share is of the money in those. Itemized gifts over $200, grouped by the words donors filed: not an industry classification, and a gift from an employee is not a gift from the employer. The FEC’s grouping also counts joint-fundraising memo lines, so these rows can add up to more than the itemized total. Gifts of $200 or less ($791,683) are not itemized, so no employer or occupation is filed for them.